Top 101 cities with largest percentage of males in occupations: Occupational and physical therapist assistants and aides (population 50,000+)

Males (%) distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 50,000+)

Top 101 cities with largest percentage of males in occupations: Occupational and physical therapist assistants and aides (population 50,000+)

RankCityMales (%)
1.
Coconino, AZ (housing) (pop. 81,338)0.1%
2.
Shelby, MI (housing) (pop. 68,294)0.1%
3.
Southeast Hidalgo, TX (housing) (pop. 124,914)0.1%
4.
Clark, NV (housing) (pop. 65,029)0.1%
5.
Carol City, FL (housing) (pop. 64,569)0.1%
6.
Enumclaw Plateau, WA (housing) (pop. 57,513)0.1%
7.
Boca Ciega, FL (housing) (pop. 68,887)0.1%
8.
Union, NJ (housing) (pop. 54,050)0.1%
9.
Wheaton-Glenmont, MD (housing) (pop. 61,910)0.1%
10.
Ewa, HI (housing) (pop. 279,683)0.1%
11.
Southwest San Gabriel Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 326,450)0.1%
12.
Columbus, GA (housing) (pop. 185,888)0.1%
13.
North Antelope Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 153,969)0.1%
14.
Sunshine Parkway, FL (housing) (pop. 153,186)0.1%
15.
Northwest Dade, FL (housing) (pop. 113,920)0.0%
16.
North Cleveland, OK (housing) (pop. 102,211)0.0%
17.
Tanner-Williams, AL (housing) (pop. 60,211)0.0%
18.
North Davis, UT (housing) (pop. 179,550)0.0%
19.
Fayette, KY (housing) (pop. 286,518)0.0%
20.
South Davis, UT (housing) (pop. 106,781)0.0%
21.
East Kern, CA (housing) (pop. 82,330)0.0%
22.
East San Gabriel Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 952,352)0.0%
23.
Loomis Basin-Folsom Lake, CA (housing) (pop. 89,014)0.0%
24.
Mather, CA (housing) (pop. 108,400)0.0%
25.
Kendall-Perrine, FL (housing) (pop. 169,007)0.0%
26.
South Westside, FL (housing) (pop. 99,883)0.0%
27.
Somerset West-Rock Creek, OR (housing) (pop. 62,062)0.0%
28.
Clarkstown, NY (housing) (pop. 84,187)0.0%
29.
Staten Island, NY (housing) (pop. 481,026)0.0%
30.
Trabuco, CA (housing) (pop. 193,712)0.0%
31.
Central Contra Costa, CA (housing) (pop. 486,883)0.0%
32.
Honolulu, HI (housing) (pop. 374,701)0.0%
33.
Kendale Lakes-Lindgren Acres, FL (housing) (pop. 341,815)0.0%
34.
North Coast, CA (housing) (pop. 376,527)0.0%
35.
Southwest Orange, FL (housing) (pop. 125,117)0.0%
36.
Bronx, NY (housing) (pop. 1,383,871)0.0%
37.
South Antelope Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 171,490)0.0%
38.
Metropolitan Government, TN (housing) (pop. 620,916)0.0%
39.
East Seattle, WA (housing) (pop. 512,735)0.0%
40.
Koolaupoko, HI (housing) (pop. 121,180)0.0%
41.
Ventura, CA (housing) (pop. 110,873)0.0%
42.
Perris Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 190,588)0.0%
43.
Newhall, CA (housing) (pop. 192,980)0.0%
44.
Queens, NY (housing) (pop. 2,277,251)0.0%
45.
Brooklyn, NY (housing) (pop. 2,538,705)0.0%
46.
Louisville, KY (housing) (pop. 262,764)0.0%
47.
South Coast, CA (housing) (pop. 298,389)0.0%
48.
Upper San Gabriel Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 327,431)0.0%
49.
Central Coast, CA (housing) (pop. 238,434)0.0%
50.
Southeast Montgomery, TX (housing) (pop. 288,750)0.0%
51.
Northwest Harris, TX (housing) (pop. 464,301)0.0%
52.
Northeast Tarrant, TX (housing) (pop. 472,730)0.0%
53.
West Contra Costa, CA (housing) (pop. 250,207)0.0%
54.
Manhattan, NY (housing) (pop. 1,621,897)0.0%
55.
Iowa City, IA (housing) (pop. 71,591)0.0%
56.
Bowie, MD (housing) (pop. 56,759)0.0%
57.
Lynn, MA (housing) (pop. 91,589)0.0%
58.
Weymouth, MA (housing) (pop. 54,393)0.0%
59.
St. Clair Shores, MI (housing) (pop. 60,070)0.0%
60.
Warren, MI (housing) (pop. 134,873)0.0%
61.
Westland, MI (housing) (pop. 82,578)0.0%
62.
Billings, MT (housing) (pop. 109,059)0.0%
63.
Missoula, MT (housing) (pop. 69,122)0.0%
64.
Reno, NV (housing) (pop. 233,294)0.0%
65.
Camden, NJ (housing) (pop. 76,903)0.0%
66.
Trenton, NJ (housing) (pop. 84,349)0.0%
67.
Santa Fe, NM (housing) (pop. 69,976)0.0%
68.
Albany, NY (housing) (pop. 98,424)0.0%
69.
New Rochelle, NY (housing) (pop. 79,446)0.0%
70.
Rochester, NY (housing) (pop. 210,358)0.0%
71.
Union, NY (housing) (pop. 56,346)0.0%
72.
Bismarck, ND (housing) (pop. 67,034)0.0%
73.
Albany, OR (housing) (pop. 51,583)0.0%
74.
Springfield, OR (housing) (pop. 60,177)0.0%
75.
Pawtucket, RI (housing) (pop. 71,172)0.0%
76.
Providence, RI (housing) (pop. 177,994)0.0%
77.
Franklin, TN (housing) (pop. 68,886)0.0%
78.
Cedar Park, TX (housing) (pop. 61,238)0.0%
79.
DeSoto, TX (housing) (pop. 51,483)0.0%
80.
Frisco, TX (housing) (pop. 136,791)0.0%
81.
Sugar Land, TX (housing) (pop. 83,860)0.0%
82.
Layton, UT (housing) (pop. 70,790)0.0%
83.
Millcreek, UT (housing) (pop. 62,139)0.0%
84.
West Valley City, UT (housing) (pop. 133,579)0.0%
85.
Renton, WA (housing) (pop. 97,003)0.0%
86.
Seattle, WA (housing) (pop. 652,405)0.0%
87.
Oshkosh, WI (housing) (pop. 66,778)0.0%
88.
Jonesboro, AR (housing) (pop. 71,551)0.0%
89.
Bellflower, CA (housing) (pop. 77,593)0.0%
90.
El Monte, CA (housing) (pop. 115,708)0.0%
91.
Encinitas, CA (housing) (pop. 61,588)0.0%
92.
Florence-Graham, CA (housing) (pop. 63,387)0.0%
93.
Fresno, CA (housing) (pop. 509,924)0.0%
94.
Hawthorne, CA (housing) (pop. 86,199)0.0%
95.
Lake Elsinore, CA (housing) (pop. 57,525)0.0%
96.
Napa, CA (housing) (pop. 79,068)0.0%
97.
Palmdale, CA (housing) (pop. 157,161)0.0%
98.
San Jose, CA (housing) (pop. 998,537)0.0%
99.
Santa Maria, CA (housing) (pop. 102,216)0.0%
100.
Ross Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 59,297)0.0%
101.
Boulder, CO (housing) (pop. 103,166)0.0%
Also check out our website just for ranking top lists with best, worst, and most of everything: ShareRanks.com.
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.