U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
Aaronsburg, Pennsylvania, Forum City-Data
U.S. Cities - Top Lists

Top 101 cities with the largest household incomes disparities (population 50,000+)


1.  College Station, TX (housing, pop. 67,890): 244% (std. dev. / median)
2.  Miami Beach, FL (housing, pop. 87,933): 230% (std. dev. / median)
3.  Miami, FL (housing, pop. 362,470): 209% (std. dev. / median)
4.  Monroe, LA (housing, pop. 53,107): 202% (std. dev. / median)
5.  Atlanta, GA (housing, pop. 416,474): 197% (std. dev. / median)
6.  New Orleans, LA (housing, pop. 484,674): 188% (std. dev. / median)
7.  Bloomington, IN (housing, pop. 69,291): 184% (std. dev. / median)
8.  Charleston, WV (housing, pop. 53,421): 183% (std. dev. / median)
9.  Athens, GA (housing, pop. 76,500): 183% (std. dev. / median)
10.  Providence, RI (housing, pop. 173,618): 183% (std. dev. / median)
11.  Huntington, WV (housing, pop. 51,475): 181% (std. dev. / median)
12.  Tuscaloosa, AL (housing, pop. 77,906): 179% (std. dev. / median)
13.  Manhattan, NY (housing, pop. 1,537,195): 178% (std. dev. / median)
14.  Columbia, SC (housing, pop. 116,278): 175% (std. dev. / median)
15.  Baton Rouge, LA (housing, pop. 227,818): 171% (std. dev. / median)
16.  Fort Lauderdale, FL (housing, pop. 152,397): 171% (std. dev. / median)
17.  Athens-Clarke County, GA (housing, pop. 100,266): 170% (std. dev. / median)
18.  Greenville, NC (housing, pop. 60,476): 170% (std. dev. / median)
19.  Los Angeles, CA (housing, pop. 3,694,820): 167% (std. dev. / median)
20.  Greenville, SC (housing, pop. 56,002): 167% (std. dev. / median)
21.  Johnson City, TN (housing, pop. 55,469): 167% (std. dev. / median)
22.  Galveston, TX (housing, pop. 57,247): 167% (std. dev. / median)
23.  Jackson, MS (housing, pop. 184,256): 167% (std. dev. / median)
24.  Washington, DC (housing, pop. 572,059): 166% (std. dev. / median)
25.  Daytona Beach, FL (housing, pop. 64,112): 166% (std. dev. / median)
26.  Tampa, FL (housing, pop. 303,447): 165% (std. dev. / median)
27.  Gainesville, FL (housing, pop. 95,447): 165% (std. dev. / median)
28.  Pittsburgh, PA (housing, pop. 334,563): 164% (std. dev. / median)
29.  Cincinnati, OH (housing, pop. 331,285): 163% (std. dev. / median)
30.  Richmond, VA (housing, pop. 197,790): 162% (std. dev. / median)
31.  Waco, TX (housing, pop. 113,726): 162% (std. dev. / median)
32.  Wilmington, NC (housing, pop. 75,838): 160% (std. dev. / median)
33.  Berkeley, CA (housing, pop. 102,743): 160% (std. dev. / median)
34.  Tyler, TX (housing, pop. 83,650): 159% (std. dev. / median)
35.  Sarasota, FL (housing, pop. 52,715): 159% (std. dev. / median)
36.  Macon, GA (housing, pop. 97,255): 159% (std. dev. / median)
37.  Charleston, SC (housing, pop. 96,650): 158% (std. dev. / median)
38.  New York, NY (housing, pop. 8,008,278): 158% (std. dev. / median)
39.  Syracuse, NY (housing, pop. 147,306): 158% (std. dev. / median)
40.  Dallas, TX (housing, pop. 1,188,580): 158% (std. dev. / median)
41.  Augusta, GA (housing, pop. 138,000): 157% (std. dev. / median)
42.  Savannah, GA (housing, pop. 131,510): 157% (std. dev. / median)
43.  Hartford, CT (housing, pop. 121,578): 156% (std. dev. / median)
44.  Lake Charles, LA (housing, pop. 71,757): 156% (std. dev. / median)
45.  Shreveport, LA (housing, pop. 200,145): 156% (std. dev. / median)
46.  Knoxville, TN (housing, pop. 173,890): 156% (std. dev. / median)
47.  West Palm Beach, FL (housing, pop. 82,103): 156% (std. dev. / median)
48.  Tallahassee, FL (housing, pop. 150,624): 155% (std. dev. / median)
49.  Buffalo, NY (housing, pop. 292,648): 155% (std. dev. / median)
50.  Fort Smith, AR (housing, pop. 80,268): 154% (std. dev. / median)
51.  Albany, GA (housing, pop. 76,939): 154% (std. dev. / median)
52.  Santa Monica, CA (housing, pop. 84,084): 154% (std. dev. / median)
53.  Pine Bluff, AR (housing, pop. 55,085): 154% (std. dev. / median)
54.  West Dougherty, GA (housing, pop. 59,680): 153% (std. dev. / median)
55.  Brooklyn, NY (housing, pop. 2,465,326): 153% (std. dev. / median)
56.  Mobile, AL (housing, pop. 198,915): 152% (std. dev. / median)
57.  New Haven, CT (housing, pop. 123,626): 152% (std. dev. / median)
58.  Beaumont, TX (housing, pop. 113,866): 151% (std. dev. / median)
59.  Pasadena, CA (housing, pop. 133,936): 151% (std. dev. / median)
60.  Louisville, KY (housing, pop. 256,231): 151% (std. dev. / median)
61.  North Miami, FL (housing, pop. 59,880): 151% (std. dev. / median)
62.  Brownsville, TX (housing, pop. 139,722): 151% (std. dev. / median)
63.  Bronx, NY (housing, pop. 1,332,650): 150% (std. dev. / median)
64.  Winston-Salem, NC (housing, pop. 185,776): 150% (std. dev. / median)
65.  Houston, TX (housing, pop. 1,953,631): 150% (std. dev. / median)
66.  Little Rock, AR (housing, pop. 183,133): 149% (std. dev. / median)
67.  Chattanooga, TN (housing, pop. 155,554): 149% (std. dev. / median)
68.  Pompano Beach, FL (housing, pop. 78,191): 148% (std. dev. / median)
69.  Newark, NJ (housing, pop. 273,546): 148% (std. dev. / median)
70.  Baltimore, MD (housing, pop. 651,154): 148% (std. dev. / median)
71.  Boca Raton, FL (housing, pop. 74,764): 148% (std. dev. / median)
72.  Lafayette, LA (housing, pop. 110,257): 148% (std. dev. / median)
73.  McAllen, TX (housing, pop. 106,414): 148% (std. dev. / median)
74.  Port Arthur, TX (housing, pop. 57,755): 148% (std. dev. / median)
75.  Iowa City, IA (housing, pop. 62,220): 148% (std. dev. / median)
76.  Fayetteville, AR (housing, pop. 58,047): 148% (std. dev. / median)
77.  Birmingham, AL (housing, pop. 242,820): 148% (std. dev. / median)
78.  Tulsa, OK (housing, pop. 393,049): 147% (std. dev. / median)
79.  Memphis, TN (housing, pop. 650,100): 146% (std. dev. / median)
80.  Dothan, AL (housing, pop. 57,737): 146% (std. dev. / median)
81.  Yakima, WA (housing, pop. 71,845): 146% (std. dev. / median)
82.  Chico, CA (housing, pop. 59,954): 146% (std. dev. / median)
83.  Utica, NY (housing, pop. 60,651): 146% (std. dev. / median)
84.  Oakland, CA (housing, pop. 399,484): 146% (std. dev. / median)
85.  Flint, MI (housing, pop. 124,943): 146% (std. dev. / median)
86.  Wilmington, DE (housing, pop. 72,664): 145% (std. dev. / median)
87.  Lubbock, TX (housing, pop. 199,564): 145% (std. dev. / median)
88.  Jackson, TN (housing, pop. 59,643): 145% (std. dev. / median)
89.  Gary, IN (housing, pop. 102,746): 145% (std. dev. / median)
90.  Odessa, TX (housing, pop. 90,943): 144% (std. dev. / median)
91.  New Rochelle, NY (housing, pop. 72,182): 144% (std. dev. / median)
92.  Springfield, MO (housing, pop. 151,580): 144% (std. dev. / median)
93.  Laredo, TX (housing, pop. 176,576): 144% (std. dev. / median)
94.  Glendale, CA (housing, pop. 194,973): 144% (std. dev. / median)
95.  Harlingen, TX (housing, pop. 57,564): 144% (std. dev. / median)
96.  Delray Beach, FL (housing, pop. 60,020): 144% (std. dev. / median)
97.  Pensacola, FL (housing, pop. 56,255): 144% (std. dev. / median)
98.  Southeast Hidalgo, TX (housing, pop. 102,051): 143% (std. dev. / median)
99.  Cambridge, MA (housing, pop. 101,355): 143% (std. dev. / median)
100.  Rocky Mount, NC (housing, pop. 55,893): 143% (std. dev. / median)
101.  Champaign, IL (housing, pop. 67,518): 143% (std. dev. / median)



Back to: Top 101 Lists, All U.S. Cities