Top 101 cities that people commute from (largest negative percentage daily daytime population change due to commuting) (population 50,000+)

Change distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 50,000+)

Top 101 cities that people commute from (largest negative percentage daily daytime population change due to commuting) (population 50,000+)

RankCityChange
1.
Sammamish, WA (housing) (pop. 50,169)-38.0%
2.
Dale City, VA (housing) (pop. 65,969)-37.5%
3.
Spring Valley, NV (housing) (pop. 178,395)-36.8%
4.
Chino Hills, CA (housing) (pop. 76,572)-36.7%
5.
Missouri City, TX (housing) (pop. 70,185)-36.0%
6.
Atascocita, TX (housing) (pop. 65,844)-35.9%
7.
South Hill, WA (housing) (pop. 52,431)-35.8%
8.
Levittown, PA (housing) (pop. 52,983)-35.7%
9.
The Hammocks, FL (housing) (pop. 51,003)-35.3%
10.
Poinciana, FL (housing) (pop. 53,193)-35.3%
11.
Centreville, VA (housing) (pop. 71,135)-35.1%
12.
Highlands Ranch, CO (housing) (pop. 96,713)-34.0%
13.
Rowlett, TX (housing) (pop. 58,043)-33.9%
14.
Kendale Lakes, FL (housing) (pop. 56,148)-33.9%
15.
Deltona, FL (housing) (pop. 86,290)-33.8%
16.
Daly City, CA (housing) (pop. 104,739)-33.4%
17.
Spring, TX (housing) (pop. 54,298)-32.9%
18.
Tamiami, FL (housing) (pop. 55,271)-32.7%
19.
Levittown, NY (housing) (pop. 51,881)-32.6%
20.
Bowie, MD (housing) (pop. 56,759)-32.3%
21.
South Whittier, CA (housing) (pop. 57,156)-32.3%
22.
Flower Mound, TX (housing) (pop. 68,609)-31.9%
23.
Pine Hills, FL (housing) (pop. 60,076)-31.5%
24.
Wheaton-Glenmont, MD (housing) (pop. 61,910)-31.2%
25.
Euless, TX (housing) (pop. 53,224)-31.1%
26.
Apple Valley, MN (housing) (pop. 50,201)-30.8%
27.
Sunrise Manor, NV (housing) (pop. 189,372)-30.5%
28.
Cedar Park, TX (housing) (pop. 61,238)-29.8%
29.
Castro Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 61,388)-29.5%
30.
Gilbert, AZ (housing) (pop. 229,972)-29.3%
31.
Hacienda Heights, CA (housing) (pop. 54,038)-29.1%
32.
Somerville, MA (housing) (pop. 78,804)-28.5%
33.
Avondale, AZ (housing) (pop. 78,822)-28.5%
34.
Carol City, FL (housing) (pop. 64,569)-28.4%
35.
Lakeville, MN (housing) (pop. 58,562)-28.3%
36.
Lakewood, OH (housing) (pop. 51,143)-28.0%
37.
Coconut Creek, FL (housing) (pop. 56,792)-27.8%
38.
Peoria, AZ (housing) (pop. 162,592)-27.6%
39.
Germantown, MD (housing) (pop. 86,395)-27.5%
40.
North Port, FL (housing) (pop. 59,212)-27.5%
41.
West Bloomfield Township, MI (housing) (pop. 65,149)-27.2%
42.
Pflugerville, TX (housing) (pop. 53,752)-27.0%
43.
Citrus Heights, CA (housing) (pop. 85,285)-26.9%
44.
Frisco, TX (housing) (pop. 136,791)-26.9%
45.
League City, TX (housing) (pop. 90,983)-26.8%
46.
Lehigh Acres, FL (housing) (pop. 86,784)-26.7%
47.
Henderson, NV (housing) (pop. 270,811)-26.6%
48.
Highland, CA (housing) (pop. 54,291)-26.4%
49.
Bellevue, NE (housing) (pop. 53,663)-26.2%
50.
Berwyn, IL (housing) (pop. 56,758)-26.2%
51.
Arvada, CO (housing) (pop. 111,707)-26.0%
52.
Elk Grove, CA (housing) (pop. 161,007)-25.9%
53.
Thornton, CO (housing) (pop. 127,359)-25.9%
54.
Revere, MA (housing) (pop. 53,756)-25.8%
55.
Laguna Niguel, CA (housing) (pop. 64,652)-25.7%
56.
Miramar, FL (housing) (pop. 130,288)-25.6%
57.
Yorba Linda, CA (housing) (pop. 67,032)-25.6%
58.
Irvington, NJ (housing) (pop. 58,920)-25.3%
59.
Antioch, CA (housing) (pop. 107,100)-25.2%
60.
Canton, MI (housing) (pop. 73,490)-25.1%
61.
Catalina Foothills, AZ (housing) (pop. 50,796)-25.1%
62.
Aliso Viejo, CA (housing) (pop. 50,175)-24.9%
63.
Wellington, FL (housing) (pop. 60,202)-24.8%
64.
Shawnee, KS (housing) (pop. 64,323)-24.6%
65.
Dearborn Heights, MI (housing) (pop. 56,620)-24.4%
66.
Blue Springs, MO (housing) (pop. 53,294)-24.3%
67.
North Richland Hills, TX (housing) (pop. 67,317)-24.2%
68.
Lakewood, CA (housing) (pop. 81,121)-24.2%
69.
South Jordan, UT (housing) (pop. 59,366)-24.2%
70.
Yucaipa, CA (housing) (pop. 52,536)-24.1%
71.
West Jordan, UT (housing) (pop. 110,077)-23.9%
72.
DeSoto, TX (housing) (pop. 51,483)-23.8%
73.
Santee, CA (housing) (pop. 56,105)-23.8%
74.
Carmichael, CA (housing) (pop. 61,762)-23.6%
75.
Hoboken, NJ (housing) (pop. 52,575)-23.6%
76.
Westland, MI (housing) (pop. 82,578)-22.9%
77.
Moore, OK (housing) (pop. 58,414)-22.8%
78.
Port St. Lucie, FL (housing) (pop. 171,016)-22.6%
79.
Lauderhill, FL (housing) (pop. 69,813)-22.6%
80.
Hendersonville, TN (housing) (pop. 54,068)-22.5%
81.
Port Orange, FL (housing) (pop. 57,203)-22.5%
82.
Westminster, CO (housing) (pop. 110,945)-22.4%
83.
Allen, TX (housing) (pop. 92,020)-22.3%
84.
Taylorsville, UT (housing) (pop. 60,519)-22.1%
85.
Irondequoit, NY (housing) (pop. 51,692)-22.0%
86.
Moreno Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 201,175)-21.9%
87.
Rocklin, CA (housing) (pop. 59,738)-21.7%
88.
Plainfield, NJ (housing) (pop. 50,588)-21.7%
89.
Diamond Bar, CA (housing) (pop. 56,449)-21.7%
90.
Pembroke Pines, FL (housing) (pop. 162,329)-21.5%
91.
Pearland, TX (housing) (pop. 100,065)-21.4%
92.
Maple Grove, MN (housing) (pop. 65,415)-21.2%
93.
Cape Coral, FL (housing) (pop. 165,831)-21.2%
94.
West New York, NJ (housing) (pop. 52,122)-21.2%
95.
Brentwood, NY (housing) (pop. 60,664)-21.2%
96.
Brookline, MA (housing) (pop. 58,732)-21.1%
97.
Casas Adobes, AZ (housing) (pop. 66,795)-21.1%
98.
Florissant, MO (housing) (pop. 52,363)-21.0%
99.
Riverview, FL (housing) (pop. 71,050)-20.8%
100.
Oak Park, IL (housing) (pop. 52,066)-20.5%
101.
Brooklyn Park, MN (housing) (pop. 78,373)-20.5%
Also check out our website just for ranking top lists with best, worst, and most of everything: ShareRanks.com.
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.