U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
Aaronsburg, Pennsylvania, Forum City-Data
U.S. Cities - Top Lists

Top 101 cities with the smallest household incomes disparities (population 50,000+)


1.  Dale City, VA (housing, pop. 55,971): 65% (std. dev. / median)
2.  Bowie, MD (housing, pop. 50,269): 66% (std. dev. / median)
3.  Burke, VA (housing, pop. 57,737): 68% (std. dev. / median)
4.  St. Peters, MO (housing, pop. 51,381): 69% (std. dev. / median)
5.  West Jordan, UT (housing, pop. 68,336): 70% (std. dev. / median)
6.  Bolingbrook, IL (housing, pop. 56,321): 71% (std. dev. / median)
7.  Elk Grove, CA (housing, pop. 59,984): 72% (std. dev. / median)
8.  Levittown, PA (housing, pop. 53,966): 72% (std. dev. / median)
9.  Flower Mound, TX (housing, pop. 50,702): 73% (std. dev. / median)
10.  Germantown, MD (housing, pop. 55,419): 73% (std. dev. / median)
11.  Maple Grove, MN (housing, pop. 50,365): 74% (std. dev. / median)
12.  Highlands Ranch, CO (housing, pop. 70,931): 74% (std. dev. / median)
13.  West Valley City, UT (housing, pop. 108,896): 74% (std. dev. / median)
14.  Coon Rapids, MN (housing, pop. 61,607): 74% (std. dev. / median)
15.  Gilbert, AZ (housing, pop. 109,697): 75% (std. dev. / median)
16.  Chino Hills, CA (housing, pop. 66,787): 75% (std. dev. / median)
17.  Canton, MI (housing, pop. 76,366): 75% (std. dev. / median)
18.  Levittown, NY (housing, pop. 53,067): 75% (std. dev. / median)
19.  Tracy, CA (housing, pop. 56,929): 75% (std. dev. / median)
20.  Thornton, CO (housing, pop. 82,384): 76% (std. dev. / median)
21.  Ewa, HI (housing, pop. 272,328): 77% (std. dev. / median)
22.  Sterling Heights, MI (housing, pop. 124,471): 78% (std. dev. / median)
23.  Graham-Thrift, WA (housing, pop. 56,970): 78% (std. dev. / median)
24.  Santee, CA (housing, pop. 52,975): 78% (std. dev. / median)
25.  Central Pasco, FL (housing, pop. 52,899): 78% (std. dev. / median)
26.  Brooklyn Park, MN (housing, pop. 67,388): 78% (std. dev. / median)
27.  Florissant, MO (housing, pop. 50,497): 79% (std. dev. / median)
28.  Lakewood, CA (housing, pop. 79,345): 79% (std. dev. / median)
29.  Redford, MI (housing, pop. 51,622): 79% (std. dev. / median)
30.  East Contra Costa, CA (housing, pop. 73,778): 80% (std. dev. / median)
31.  Tahoma-Maple Valley, WA (housing, pop. 52,781): 80% (std. dev. / median)
32.  Missouri City, TX (housing, pop. 52,913): 80% (std. dev. / median)
33.  Cerritos, CA (housing, pop. 51,488): 80% (std. dev. / median)
34.  Mentor, OH (housing, pop. 50,278): 81% (std. dev. / median)
35.  Union City, CA (housing, pop. 66,869): 81% (std. dev. / median)
36.  Fountain Valley, CA (housing, pop. 54,978): 81% (std. dev. / median)
37.  Clay, NY (housing, pop. 58,805): 81% (std. dev. / median)
38.  Brentwood, NY (housing, pop. 53,917): 81% (std. dev. / median)
39.  Westland, MI (housing, pop. 86,602): 81% (std. dev. / median)
40.  Corona, CA (housing, pop. 124,966): 82% (std. dev. / median)
41.  North Davis, UT (housing, pop. 149,866): 82% (std. dev. / median)
42.  East Canadian, OK (housing, pop. 61,645): 82% (std. dev. / median)
43.  Olathe, KS (housing, pop. 92,962): 82% (std. dev. / median)
44.  Brandon, FL (housing, pop. 77,895): 82% (std. dev. / median)
45.  Port St. Lucie, FL (housing, pop. 88,769): 83% (std. dev. / median)
46.  Milpitas, CA (housing, pop. 62,698): 83% (std. dev. / median)
47.  Lewisville, TX (housing, pop. 77,737): 83% (std. dev. / median)
48.  Naperville, IL (housing, pop. 128,358): 83% (std. dev. / median)
49.  Simi Valley, CA (housing, pop. 111,351): 83% (std. dev. / median)
50.  Temecula, CA (housing, pop. 57,716): 83% (std. dev. / median)
51.  Antioch, CA (housing, pop. 90,532): 83% (std. dev. / median)
52.  Mesquite, TX (housing, pop. 124,523): 83% (std. dev. / median)
53.  Vacaville, CA (housing, pop. 88,625): 83% (std. dev. / median)
54.  Broken Arrow, OK (housing, pop. 74,859): 84% (std. dev. / median)
55.  Chino, CA (housing, pop. 67,168): 84% (std. dev. / median)
56.  Livermore, CA (housing, pop. 73,345): 84% (std. dev. / median)
57.  Livonia, MI (housing, pop. 100,545): 84% (std. dev. / median)
58.  Southeast Harris, TX (housing, pop. 82,015): 84% (std. dev. / median)
59.  Eagan, MN (housing, pop. 63,557): 84% (std. dev. / median)
60.  Rio Rancho, NM (housing, pop. 51,765): 84% (std. dev. / median)
61.  Chandler, AZ (housing, pop. 176,581): 84% (std. dev. / median)
62.  Enumclaw Plateau, WA (housing, pop. 53,853): 84% (std. dev. / median)
63.  Arvada, CO (housing, pop. 102,153): 84% (std. dev. / median)
64.  Cary, NC (housing, pop. 94,536): 84% (std. dev. / median)
65.  South San Francisco, CA (housing, pop. 60,552): 84% (std. dev. / median)
66.  Sandy, UT (housing, pop. 88,418): 84% (std. dev. / median)
67.  Folsom, CA (housing, pop. 51,884): 85% (std. dev. / median)
68.  Hillsboro, OR (housing, pop. 70,186): 85% (std. dev. / median)
69.  South Whittier, CA (housing, pop. 55,193): 85% (std. dev. / median)
70.  Moreno Valley, CA (housing, pop. 142,381): 85% (std. dev. / median)
71.  Deer Valley, AZ (housing, pop. 148,777): 85% (std. dev. / median)
72.  Parma, OH (housing, pop. 85,655): 85% (std. dev. / median)
73.  Ellicott City, MD (housing, pop. 56,397): 85% (std. dev. / median)
74.  Taylorsville, UT (housing, pop. 57,439): 85% (std. dev. / median)
75.  Cupertino, CA (housing, pop. 50,546): 86% (std. dev. / median)
76.  Round Rock, TX (housing, pop. 61,136): 86% (std. dev. / median)
77.  Yorba Linda, CA (housing, pop. 58,918): 86% (std. dev. / median)
78.  Waukesha, WI (housing, pop. 64,825): 86% (std. dev. / median)
79.  Westminster, CO (housing, pop. 100,940): 86% (std. dev. / median)
80.  Norwalk, CA (housing, pop. 103,298): 86% (std. dev. / median)
81.  North Cleveland, OK (housing, pop. 90,295): 86% (std. dev. / median)
82.  West Adams, CO (housing, pop. 259,628): 86% (std. dev. / median)
83.  Pittsburg, CA (housing, pop. 56,769): 86% (std. dev. / median)
84.  Taunton, MA (housing, pop. 55,976): 86% (std. dev. / median)
85.  Layton, UT (housing, pop. 58,474): 86% (std. dev. / median)
86.  Fontana, CA (housing, pop. 128,929): 86% (std. dev. / median)
87.  Elgin, IL (housing, pop. 94,487): 87% (std. dev. / median)
88.  Deltona, FL (housing, pop. 69,543): 87% (std. dev. / median)
89.  Milford, CT (housing, pop. 50,594): 87% (std. dev. / median)
90.  El Toro, CA (housing, pop. 172,825): 87% (std. dev. / median)
91.  St. Clair Shores, MI (housing, pop. 63,096): 87% (std. dev. / median)
92.  Schaumburg, IL (housing, pop. 75,386): 87% (std. dev. / median)
93.  Mission Viejo, CA (housing, pop. 93,102): 87% (std. dev. / median)
94.  Pleasanton, CA (housing, pop. 63,654): 87% (std. dev. / median)
95.  Columbia, MD (housing, pop. 88,254): 88% (std. dev. / median)
96.  Chesapeake, VA (housing, pop. 199,184): 88% (std. dev. / median)
97.  Clarkstown, NY (housing, pop. 82,082): 88% (std. dev. / median)
98.  Fremont, CA (housing, pop. 203,413): 88% (std. dev. / median)
99.  Lee's Summit, MO (housing, pop. 70,700): 88% (std. dev. / median)
100.  Dearborn Heights, MI (housing, pop. 58,264): 88% (std. dev. / median)
101.  Rancho Cucamonga, CA (housing, pop. 127,743): 88% (std. dev. / median)



Back to: Top 101 Lists, All U.S. Cities