Top 101 cities with the largest percentage of people in job corps and vocational training facilities (population 1,000+)

People (%) distibution for all U.S. cities

Top 101 cities with the largest percentage of people in job corps and vocational training facilities (population 1,000+)

RankCityPeople (%)
1.
Breckinridge Center, KY (housing) (pop. 2,080)63.6%
2.
Fort Devens, MA (housing) (pop. 1,075)26.0%
3.
Limestone, ME (housing) (pop. 1,075)22.8%
4.
Sula-Edwards, MT (housing) (pop. 1,557)16.2%
5.
Delaware, NY (housing) (pop. 2,670)13.8%
6.
Pine Knot, KY (housing) (pop. 1,621)13.0%
7.
Curlew, WA (housing) (pop. 1,623)11.5%
8.
Vergennes, VT (housing) (pop. 2,588)11.1%
9.
Samish, WA (housing) (pop. 4,456)7.9%
10.
Holston Valley, TN (housing) (pop. 3,158)6.7%
11.
Bamberg, SC (housing) (pop. 3,512)5.8%
12.
Park Hill, OK (housing) (pop. 3,909)5.3%
13.
Moses Lake North, WA (housing) (pop. 4,418)4.8%
14.
South Weber, UT (housing) (pop. 6,525)4.6%
15.
Mountain City, NV (housing) (pop. 1,498)4.2%
16.
South Yakima, WA (housing) (pop. 4,512)4.1%
17.
Northwest Comanche, OK (housing) (pop. 5,111)4.1%
18.
Palmer, AK (housing) (pop. 6,461)4.1%
19.
Crystal Springs, MS (housing) (pop. 4,985)4.0%
20.
Guthrie, OK (housing) (pop. 10,908)3.9%
21.
Clearfield, UT (housing) (pop. 30,467)3.9%
22.
Denison, IA (housing) (pop. 8,457)3.8%
23.
South Cherokee, OK (housing) (pop. 6,023)3.7%
24.
Shelby, NY (housing) (pop. 5,319)3.6%
25.
Excelsior Springs, MO (housing) (pop. 11,418)3.3%
26.
Southwest Chaves, NM (housing) (pop. 6,240)3.0%
27.
Corbett, OR (housing) (pop. 3,951)2.9%
28.
Weston, CO (housing) (pop. 1,617)2.6%
29.
North Umpqua, OR (housing) (pop. 5,381)2.6%
30.
Talmage, CA (housing) (pop. 1,130)2.3%
31.
Imperial Beach, CA (housing) (pop. 27,063)2.3%
32.
East Dougherty, GA (housing) (pop. 36,163)2.2%
33.
Marion, VA (housing) (pop. 5,905)2.2%
34.
Grafton, MA (housing) (pop. 17,765)2.0%
35.
Pomfret, NY (housing) (pop. 14,965)1.9%
36.
North Valleys, NV (housing) (pop. 40,467)1.6%
37.
Anaconda, MT (housing) (pop. 7,626)1.4%
38.
Muscoy, CA (housing) (pop. 10,644)1.4%
39.
Goodland, KS (housing) (pop. 4,557)1.3%
40.
Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, MT (housing) (pop. 9,329)1.2%
41.
Westbrook Center, CT (housing) (pop. 2,413)1.2%
42.
McKinney, TX (housing) (pop. 148,559)1.2%
43.
Albany, GA (housing) (pop. 76,185)1.1%
44.
Sands Point, NY (housing) (pop. 2,717)0.8%
45.
North Davis, UT (housing) (pop. 179,550)0.8%
46.
Bangor, ME (housing) (pop. 32,673)0.8%
47.
Chicopee, MA (housing) (pop. 55,717)0.8%
48.
Gadsden, AL (housing) (pop. 36,542)0.7%
49.
Kotzebue, AK (housing) (pop. 3,272)0.7%
50.
West Yellowstone, MT (housing) (pop. 1,321)0.7%
51.
San Marcos, TX (housing) (pop. 54,076)0.6%
52.
Fortuna, CA (housing) (pop. 11,788)0.6%
53.
Edison, NJ (housing) (pop. 101,207)0.6%
54.
Minot, ND (housing) (pop. 46,321)0.5%
55.
Nampa, ID (housing) (pop. 86,518)0.5%
56.
Harrisonville, KY (housing) (pop. 5,157)0.4%
57.
Westbrook, CT (housing) (pop. 6,938)0.4%
58.
Roswell, NM (housing) (pop. 48,611)0.4%
59.
Valley, GA (housing) (pop. 8,306)0.3%
60.
Ottawa, KS (housing) (pop. 12,482)0.3%
61.
Reno, NV (housing) (pop. 233,294)0.3%
62.
Roslyn, NY (housing) (pop. 2,791)0.3%
63.
Carol City, FL (housing) (pop. 64,569)0.3%
64.
Gulfport, MS (housing) (pop. 71,012)0.3%
65.
Hamden, CT (housing) (pop. 60,960)0.3%
66.
Joliet, IL (housing) (pop. 147,806)0.3%
67.
Steubenville, OH (housing) (pop. 18,355)0.3%
68.
Talladega, AL (housing) (pop. 15,846)0.3%
69.
Flint, MI (housing) (pop. 99,763)0.2%
70.
North Charleston, SC (housing) (pop. 104,054)0.2%
71.
Sturgis, SD (housing) (pop. 6,883)0.2%
72.
Pittsford, VT (housing) (pop. 2,991)0.2%
73.
Sitka, AK (housing) (pop. 9,020)0.2%
74.
Koolaupoko, HI (housing) (pop. 121,180)0.2%
75.
East Cameron, TX (housing) (pop. 20,879)0.2%
76.
Canon City, CO (housing) (pop. 16,318)0.2%
77.
Shorewood Hills, WI (housing) (pop. 1,799)0.2%
78.
Dayton, OH (housing) (pop. 143,355)0.2%
79.
Northwest Dade, FL (housing) (pop. 113,920)0.2%
80.
Atlanta, GA (housing) (pop. 447,841)0.1%
81.
Porterville, CA (housing) (pop. 55,174)0.1%
82.
St. Louis, MO (housing) (pop. 318,416)0.1%
83.
Shreveport, LA (housing) (pop. 200,327)0.1%
84.
Montgomery, AL (housing) (pop. 201,332)0.1%
85.
Grand Rapids, MI (housing) (pop. 192,294)0.1%
86.
Pittsburgh, PA (housing) (pop. 305,841)0.1%
87.
Oreland, PA (housing) (pop. 5,678)0.1%
88.
Laredo, TX (housing) (pop. 248,142)0.1%
89.
St. Paul, MN (housing) (pop. 294,873)0.1%
90.
Glenside, PA (housing) (pop. 8,384)0.1%
91.
San Juan, WA (housing) (pop. 7,447)0.1%
92.
Ardmore, PA (housing) (pop. 12,455)0.1%
93.
Upper Skagit, WA (housing) (pop. 5,068)0.1%
94.
Washington, DC (housing) (pop. 646,449)0.1%
95.
Tulsa, OK (housing) (pop. 398,121)0.1%
96.
Spencer, IA (housing) (pop. 11,150)0.1%
97.
Sacramento, CA (housing) (pop. 479,686)0.1%
98.
Vallejo, CA (housing) (pop. 118,837)0.1%
99.
Hudson, MA (housing) (pop. 14,907)0.1%
100.
Banning, CA (housing) (pop. 30,506)0.1%
101.
North El Dorado, CA (housing) (pop. 31,656)0.1%
Also check out our website just for ranking top lists with best, worst, and most of everything: ShareRanks.com.
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.