Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Again. I don't see a huge difference between England, Germany, Finland and Sweden.
''FaceResearch.org, a site run by two psychologists at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland, features software that can average together faces from thousands of photos. These images purportedly show the average face of women from 40 different nationalities.''
There are not much because Its a blend of different women, heck there are not even that much difference between southern and northern europeans in those morphs.
You can see in that link what I mean:
From these images we can confirm much of what's already known about Caucasoids:
1) Swedes and Dutch are more Nordic than Germans, who have a strong Alpine component; and Britons are distinguished from all by the Mediterranean elements in their population.
2) Likewise, Spaniards and Portuguese are more Mediterranean than Italians and Greeks, who both have Alpine and Dinaric elements in their make-up.
3) Eastern Slavs (Ukrainians) show the Baltic/Uralic "Slavic look" more prominently than western Slavs (Poles/Czechs) and southern Slavs (Serbians/Croatians), who resemble their non-Slavic neighbors.
4) Despite much crossbreeding with the spread of Islam, three Middle Eastern Mediterranean types are well-defined: Irano-Afghan of Iran, Orientalid Arabian, and Berberid Tunisian of North Africa.
5) The average Caucasoid looks, well, average — he could fit in just about anywhere; and the four constituent composites have distinctive looks that sharply delineate their respective regions.
They are mostly in cities such as liverpool and MAnchester, however It doesnt explain why those types are still common among south-west english and welsh people.
Noel Gallagher wont stand out anywhere in the UK, same for john lennon, whether his type is a bit more or less common in the UK than Ireland Its another thing.
Liverpool has a large Celtic immigrant population of Irish and Welsh ancestry, I thought you knew Great Britain. Many combine usually pale complexions and all shades of brown hair with blue,green,gray or hazel eyes. Today, because populations have moved more, people like Gallagher won't stand out as much as they would have 300 years ago. You most likely wouldn't know that there are differences between British people as well. Ignorance is not good for you. [/quote]
Liverpool has a large Celtic immigrant population of Irish and Welsh ancestry, I thought you knew Great Britain. Many combine usually pale complexions and all shades of brown hair with blue,green,gray or hazel eyes. Today, because populations have moved more, people like Gallagher won't stand out as much as they would have 300 years ago. You most likely wouldn't know that there are differences between British people as well. Ignorance is not good for you.
[/quote]
Well there are differences but dont tell me there are no native scots/english (who arent direct descendants of Irish people) who can look like the gallagher brothers. How many people has england? 53 million? what about Ireland? 6.4 million?
Dont tell me that much tinier population is responsible for the huge amount of brits who look similar to noel gallagher.
They are mostly in cities such as liverpool and MAnchester, however It doesnt explain why those types are still common among south-west english and welsh people.
Noel Gallagher wont stand out anywhere in the UK, same for john lennon, whether his type is a bit more or less common in the UK than Ireland Its another thing.
Noel is of full Irish ancestry but John is of Welsh and Irish ancestry. George is also of Welsh and Irish ancestry. Paul is of English, Irish and Scottish ancestry. Ringo is all English.
Well there are differences but dont tell me there are no native scots/english (who arent direct descendants of Irish people) who can look like the gallagher brothers. How many people has england? 53 million? what about Ireland? 6.4 million?
Dont tell me that much tinier population is responsible for the huge amount of brits who look similar to noel gallagher.[/quote]
There is also quite a bit of English, Welsh and Scottish ancestry all over Ireland. Also Northern Ireland has a huge ancestry from Scotland and Northern England.
Well there are differences but dont tell me there are no native scots/english (who arent direct descendants of Irish people) who can look like the gallagher brothers. How many people has england? 53 million? what about Ireland? 6.4 million?
Dont tell me that much tinier population is responsible for the huge amount of brits who look similar to noel gallagher.[/quote]
I agree with you on this one Traveller. The Irish if anything would have increased the amount of blue eyes in Britain. Areas like Cornwall and Wales are on a whole darker than Ireland. Noel Gallagher isn't that dark anyway
Well there are differences but dont tell me there are no native scots/english (who arent direct descendants of Irish people) who can look like the gallagher brothers. How many people has england? 53 million? what about Ireland? 6.4 million?
Dont tell me that much tinier population is responsible for the huge amount of brits who look similar to noel gallagher.
I agree with you on this one Traveller. The Irish if anything would have increased the amount of blue eyes in Britain. Areas like Cornwall and Wales are on a whole darker than Ireland. Noel Gallagher isn't that dark anyway [/quote]
Is not about coloring, I quoted him back to discuss the facial features we link or relate to ancient british peoples, facial structure, not hair/eye/skin color or whatever.
There are not much because Its a blend of different women, heck there are not even that much difference between southern and northern europeans in those morphs.
You can see in that link what I mean:
From these images we can confirm much of what's already known about Caucasoids:
1) Swedes and Dutch are more Nordic than Germans, who have a strong Alpine component; and Britons are distinguished from all by the Mediterranean elements in their population.
2) Likewise, Spaniards and Portuguese are more Mediterranean than Italians and Greeks, who both have Alpine and Dinaric elements in their make-up.
3) Eastern Slavs (Ukrainians) show the Baltic/Uralic "Slavic look" more prominently than western Slavs (Poles/Czechs) and southern Slavs (Serbians/Croatians), who resemble their non-Slavic neighbors.
4) Despite much crossbreeding with the spread of Islam, three Middle Eastern Mediterranean types are well-defined: Irano-Afghan of Iran, Orientalid Arabian, and Berberid Tunisian of North Africa.
5) The average Caucasoid looks, well, average — he could fit in just about anywhere; and the four constituent composites have distinctive looks that sharply delineate their respective regions.
I knew you had a problem from the beginning. Your agenda has now been exposed by others. The British have a higher Northern European than Germans and are less Mediterranean than Germans. The National Geographic Genographic Project which is much more credible than the worthless morphs you got from that bias or racialist site. You're the one who read too much of Gobineau's writing. The fat American knows much more than you ever will, learn something.
DANISH
This reference population is based on samples collected from people living in Denmark. The dominant 53% Northern European component likely reflects the earliest settlers in Europe, hunter-gatherers who arrived there more than 35,000 years ago. The 30% Mediterranean and 16% Southwest Asian percentages arrived later, with the spread of agriculture from the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East over the past 10,000 years. As these early farmers moved into Europe, they spread their genetic patterns as well. Today, northern European populations retain the links to both earliest Europeans and these later migrants from the Middle East.
Now you know why I said that the Danes were more Nordic, obviously the Northern European is higher than that of Britain.
BRITISH (UNITED KINGDOM)
This reference population is based on samples collected from populations in the United Kingdom. The dominant 50% northern European component likely reflects the earliest settlers in Europe, hunter-gatherers who arrived there more than 35,000 years ago. The 33% Mediterranean and 17% Southwest Asian percentages arrived later, with the spread of agriculture from the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East, over the past 10,000 years. As these early farmers moved into Europe, they spread their genetic patterns as well. Today, northern European populations retain their links to both the earliest Europeans and these later migrants from the Middle East.
Brits are basically Northern Europeans not what you imagined.
GERMAN
This reference population is based on samples collected from people native to Germany. The dominant 46% Northern European component likely reflects the earliest settlers in Europe, hunter-gatherers who arrived there more than 35,000 years ago. The 36% Mediterranean and 17% Southwest Asian percentages probably arrived later, with the spread of agriculture from the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East over the past 10,000 years. As these early farmers moved into Europe, they spread their genetic patterns as well. Today, northern and central European populations retain links to both the earliest Europeans and these later migrants from the Middle East.
Germans are not more Northern European than the Brits, too bad.
I agree with you on this one Traveller. The Irish if anything would have increased the amount of blue eyes in Britain. Areas like Cornwall and Wales are on a whole darker than Ireland. Noel Gallagher isn't that dark anyway
Is not about coloring, we were discussing the facial features we link or relate to ancient british peoples, facial structure, not hair/eye/skin color or whatever.[/quote]
People have all different features. They are not from a mould. There are some stereotypical looking people but a lot of people look nondescript. You wouldn't know where they were from if they didn't have an accent.
If you are so interested you really should get off the internet and really visit these countries.
I knew you had a problem from the beginning. Your agenda has now been exposed by others. The British have a higher Northern European than Germans and are less Mediterranean than Germans. The National Geographic Genographic Project which is much more credible than the worthless morphs you got from that bias or racialist site. You're the one who read too much of Gobineau's writing. The fat American knows much more than you ever will, learn something.
DANISH
This reference population is based on samples collected from people living in Denmark. The dominant 53% Northern European component likely reflects the earliest settlers in Europe, hunter-gatherers who arrived there more than 35,000 years ago. The 30% Mediterranean and 16% Southwest Asian percentages arrived later, with the spread of agriculture from the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East over the past 10,000 years. As these early farmers moved into Europe, they spread their genetic patterns as well. Today, northern European populations retain the links to both earliest Europeans and these later migrants from the Middle East.
Now you know why I said that the Danes were more Nordic, obviously the Northern European is higher than that of Britain.
BRITISH (UNITED KINGDOM)
This reference population is based on samples collected from populations in the United Kingdom. The dominant 50% northern European component likely reflects the earliest settlers in Europe, hunter-gatherers who arrived there more than 35,000 years ago. The 33% Mediterranean and 17% Southwest Asian percentages arrived later, with the spread of agriculture from the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East, over the past 10,000 years. As these early farmers moved into Europe, they spread their genetic patterns as well. Today, northern European populations retain their links to both the earliest Europeans and these later migrants from the Middle East.
Brits are basically Northern Europeans not what you imagined.
GERMAN
This reference population is based on samples collected from people native to Germany. The dominant 46% Northern European component likely reflects the earliest settlers in Europe, hunter-gatherers who arrived there more than 35,000 years ago. The 36% Mediterranean and 17% Southwest Asian percentages probably arrived later, with the spread of agriculture from the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East over the past 10,000 years. As these early farmers moved into Europe, they spread their genetic patterns as well. Today, northern and central European populations retain links to both the earliest Europeans and these later migrants from the Middle East.
Germans are not more Northern European than the Brits, too bad.
Do they have one of those for the Irish? I'd be interested in seeing one. A link would be great.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
