Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-30-2021, 04:48 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts & Hilton Head, SC
10,020 posts, read 15,665,421 times
Reputation: 8669

Advertisements

It's probably culture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2021, 06:13 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,254,477 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyB View Post
It's probably culture.

A chunk of it is strictly socioeconomic. When you hear that lots of people feel lousy for a few days after their jabs and you're paid hourly with no sick time, you'd be far less likely to get vaccinated. If vaccinated meant you were entitled to a couple of paid sick days, I think you'd see more people getting vaccinated in the failed cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2021, 07:17 AM
 
7,924 posts, read 7,814,489 times
Reputation: 4152
Well if you have social benefits that prevent the need to go out the incentives are lower. Amazon takes EBT, ui Bennies are still high, school district gives out boxes of food, eviction moratorium etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2021, 07:23 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,957,550 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
A chunk of it is strictly socioeconomic. When you hear that lots of people feel lousy for a few days after their jabs and you're paid hourly with no sick time, you'd be far less likely to get vaccinated. If vaccinated meant you were entitled to a couple of paid sick days, I think you'd see more people getting vaccinated in the failed cities.



Absolutely. Heck, that's why a lot of people I know in retail didn't even get tested. Not once. They were terrified that if they had a positive test they'd not be able to work for a couple of weeks. That's enough to lose everything.



Now, more civilized/less conservative nations had ways to help mitigate this (paying people to stay home), but we aren't one of those places. We do have a Federal program, I believe still in effect, to cover sick time for vaccine appts and after effects, but its not widely known and small business rarely have the time / know how to access stuff like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2021, 07:29 AM
 
16,395 posts, read 8,187,139 times
Reputation: 11378
People in communities like Newton just care more about doing the right thing than people in a place like Springfield. If you live in a place like Newton chances are you've been doing the 'right' things your whole life. The Newton people probably aren't eating McDonald's or smoking cigarettes the way some of the people in Springfield are either. I'm not sure really what the point of this drs comparison was. It's like saying yeah people in Newton make more money and have more degrees than people in Springfield. And water is wet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2021, 07:34 AM
 
Location: New England
1,055 posts, read 1,415,487 times
Reputation: 1836
What the last few postings are making me wonder is whether poor people who are on welfare are more likely to get vaccinated than poor people who have jobs. If potential time off work were the issue, there should be a difference, but is there any?

It's a constant problem in social policy to get poor people to take better care of themselves. And there's a constant debate about whether it's right for prosperous people to TELL poor people to take better care of themselves. It's been going on forever and I doubt if it'll ever be resolved.

Last edited by Amontillado; 05-30-2021 at 07:42 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2021, 07:35 AM
 
16,395 posts, read 8,187,139 times
Reputation: 11378
No one looks forward to feeling ill regardless of what their working situation might be. It's also naive to think everyone in city like Springfield even has a job in the first place. Plenty of people in the service industry aren't back to work yet. My employer has said over and over to just take time off for the vaccine. Even if I get time off from my job I don't get time off from my kids. I made my appts for a Saturday. So far I only got the first one and i didn't think I'd have any effects since it's the second one I've heard people complain about. I had bad muscle aches for two days. Not sure what to expect with # 2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2021, 07:50 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,254,477 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amontillado View Post
What the last few postings are making me wonder is whether poor people who are on welfare are more likely to get vaccinated than poor people who have jobs. If potential time off work were the issue, there should be a difference, but is there any?

It's a constant problem in social policy to get poor people to take better care of themselves. And there's a constant debate about whether it's right for prosperous people to TELL poor people to take better care of themselves. It's been going on forever and I doubt if it'll ever be resolved.

Who are these "poor people on welfare"? The welfare reform law enacted under Bill Clinton doesn't grant cash welfare benefits to able bodied people. The "T" in TANF is "temporary". Unless they're disabled, poor people have to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2021, 07:52 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,957,550 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
Who are these "poor people on welfare"? The welfare reform law enacted under Bill Clinton doesn't grant cash welfare benefits to able bodied people. The "T" in TANF is "temporary". Unless they're disabled, poor people have to work.



Poor people tend to work A LOT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2021, 07:59 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,254,477 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Poor people tend to work A LOT.

Yep. There's this Fox News mythology that poor people spend their day sitting on the sofa watching game shows. It gets working class white people to vote against safety net programs paid for by rich people that those working class white people would benefit from. Brilliant Rupert Murdoch political manipulation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top