Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-19-2012, 04:37 AM
 
Location: Armsanta Sorad
5,648 posts, read 8,054,362 times
Reputation: 2462

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
It's difficult to understand what you are saying as your post is rather incoherent.

Let me see if I can get it straight...

1) You don't think women are human.
2) You don't care if the human race goes extinct.
3) You think that women who object to males with mysoginist views like yours hate all men and turn 'lezzie' to 'express their hate".

Hmmm.... You know, I don't think any gay men would like your views either, so 'choosing' to be gay won't work for you either.

You really are in a difficult spot aren't you? Perhaps you should just stick to non-human species?
I think gay men are the same as broads. I actually support straight-gay segregation. There's a lot of gay men in positions of power, like Barack Obama and Joe Biden. They might be married, but they're really gay. The VAWA act and anti-male laws, most which was legislated by so-called men. So no, I can't be exclusively mad at the women. White Knights share the blame for supporting a female supremacist hate group.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2012, 04:41 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,379,343 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by West of Encino View Post
Do you see how moronic feminists can be with their double standards? They're always telling us to go gay if we talk bad about women or against feminism, but they won't tell misandric chicks to go lezzy. They just want to just the normal man up.

I tell you, man. Normal men are under attack by feminized men, misandric women, feminist hags, and the gay community when they express their views.
Well there's your first problem. You think your women-hating views are those of a 'normal' man. They aren't.

Here's another clue. People don't choose to be gay or lesbian- I was just messing with you.

Straight "misandric chicks" are in a tough spot too I suppose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 04:42 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,379,343 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by West of Encino View Post
I think gay men are the same as broads. I actually support straight-gay segregation. There's a lot of gay men in positions of power, like Barack Obama and Joe Biden. They might be married, but they're really gay. The VAWA act and anti-male laws, most which was legislated by so-called men. So no, I can't be exclusively mad at the women. White Knights share the blame for supporting a female supremacist hate group.
Oh dear. I think you have a few more problems than just hating all women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 04:44 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,379,343 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
I do hope that you started with yourself.
Yep. He should walk the talk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 05:37 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,273,993 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by West of Encino View Post
I think gay men are the same as broads. I actually support straight-gay segregation. There's a lot of gay men in positions of power, like Barack Obama and Joe Biden. They might be married, but they're really gay. The VAWA act and anti-male laws, most which was legislated by so-called men. So no, I can't be exclusively mad at the women. White Knights share the blame for supporting a female supremacist hate group.
Broads?
So, the only real men are men like you?

Have a problem with dating?

This post is laughable; pathetic, but laughable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 06:40 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,379,343 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy O. Fernicher View Post
Who are these "real" mean? Pathetic p*ssy whipped sissy boys?
Pathetic 'sissy boys' are insecure males who petulantly demand that women to be subservient to them because they don't have the cojones to be in an equal relationship with a strong intelligent independent woman as a partner/wife. Pathetic sissy boys are the ones who whine on and on about feminists hating men. Feminists don't hate men. They just have no time for those insecure males who are petulant little bully boys in mens bodies.

Last edited by Ceist; 02-19-2012 at 06:49 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 06:45 AM
 
4,367 posts, read 3,482,784 times
Reputation: 1431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Pathetic 'sissy boys' are insecure males who petulantly demand that women to be subservient to them because they don't have the cojones to be in a relationship with a strong intelligent independent woman as a partner/wife.
Why? What's really in if for the man? Is like Russian Roulette now for a man, with its risk of financial ruin. Most divorces are filed by women, and they get custody and child-support overwhelmingly. Its too much of a gamble.

And what's so "strong" about these women? All the talk of them being independent, when in fact they depend more and more on Big Daddy: The State. What the hell is so independent about that? Really now, the Empress has no clothes. And she sags.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 06:50 AM
 
5,036 posts, read 5,135,940 times
Reputation: 2356
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightflight View Post
Why? What's really in if for the man? Is like Russian Roulette now for a man, with its risk of financial ruin. Most divorces are filed by women, and they get custody and child-support overwhelmingly. Its too much of a gamble.

And what's so "strong" about these women? All the talk of them being independent, when in fact they depend more and more on Big Daddy: The State. What the hell is so independent about that? Really now, the Empress has no clothes. And she sags.
You're right. Our society for a long while now has pushed for equality of women, in any sense they can. Women of today are suppose to be soooo independent.

However, they want it both ways. Women can have an abortion and men have absolutely no say if by chance he wants to keep the baby. Yet if the woman keeps it, and he just wants to walk away, he has no say and has to pay monthly for 18 years.

Then in divorce, men are the ones who have to worry about losing a house, money, and other valuables.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 06:50 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,275,882 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightflight View Post
Why? What's really in if for the man? Is like Russian Roulette now for a man, with its risk of financial ruin. Most divorces are filed by women, and they get custody and child-support overwhelmingly. Its too much of a gamble.

And what's so "strong" about these women? All the talk of them being independent, when in fact they depend more and more on Big Daddy: The State. What the hell is so independent about that? Really now, the Empress has no clothes. And she sags.
Child custody for the most part if determined out of court in which men most often cede primary care to their current wives. In cases that do go to court women still get primary custody because often they actually do the lions share of the childcare in the marriage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 06:54 AM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 36,987,037 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
You're right. Our society for a long while now has pushed for equality of women, in any sense they can. Women of today are suppose to be soooo independent.

However, they want it both ways. Women can have an abortion and men have absolutely no say if by chance he wants to keep the baby. Yet if the woman keeps it, and he just wants to walk away, he has no say and has to pay monthly for 18 years.

Then in divorce, men are the ones who have to worry about losing a house, money, and other valuables.
If you play, you pay.
Got it?
Dont wanna pay?
Tie a knot in your winkie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top