Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I said "Putin's desire for the Republic is no more or less "legitimate" than any other view of it."
That would mean any other view would be no more or less legit than his...including the Ukrainians that want to remain in the "gang" they have been in since 1991.
I'm talking about giving them 100 Billion of our taxpayers money...when we are 31 Trillion in debt, plagued with inflation & many hurting, even homeless. We need that money for our own people.
We didn't spend that much for a year of fighting in the Middle East on two fronts.
That's double Russia's entire annual Defense Budget...a crazy amount of money.
Who doesn't see that doesn't pass the smell test?
ONE HUNDRED BILLION?!! Get outta here with that scam!!
Not to mention backing a ruthless leader into a corner.
Most say, "He would never use nukes...he's bluffing". Typically the same that said, "He won't attack...he's bluffing".
He can have any point of view he wants, legitimate or not. That doesnt mean that he has the right to attack another country.
He can have any point of view he wants, legitimate or not. That doesnt mean that he has the right to attack another country.
What do you mean he doesn't?...he did.
Ask him or the people in all the Opposition Parties that Zelenskyy threw out what is right.
Ask me.
Nobody's point of view is any more or less "legitimate" than any other.
I guess you could say no aggression whatsoever is "moral", "right", and "legitimate"...not even retaliatory.
I'm assessing it from a overall perspective.
I'm in NY...this is what lots of people here think...and they let their Representative know it: https://twitter.com/JosBtrigga/statu...to-nuclear-war
I said "Putin's desire for the Republic is no more or less "legitimate" than any other view of it."
You seem to harbor pretty strong feelings against the view that the US and NATO should help out a country that's under attack. If you want to pretend to be nihilist, own it.
What do you mean he doesn't?...he did.
Ask him or the people in all the Opposition Parties that Zelenskyy threw out what is right.
Ask me.
Nobody's point of view is any more or less "legitimate" than any other.
I guess you could say no aggression whatsoever is "moral", "right", and "legitimate"...not even retaliatory.
I'm assessing it from a overall perspective.
I'm in NY...this is what lots of people here think...and they let their Representative know it: https://twitter.com/JosBtrigga/statu...to-nuclear-war
You missed the part where I said he doesnt have the RIGHT to do it. Just because someone does something doesnt mean they have the RIGHT to do something.
You missed the part where I said he doesnt have the RIGHT to do it. Just because someone does something doesnt mean they have the RIGHT to do something.
The "RIGHT" based upon what? Your arbitrary opinion?
He thinks he does have the RIGHT...he always has.
And he is the one that was part of a Republic with them.
So...there ya go.
I don't think anyone should have had the "RIGHT" to break up the Republic to begin with. HOWBOWDAH?!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
