Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2011, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,797 posts, read 24,283,603 times
Reputation: 15148

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
There will always be conspiracy theories as long as there are conspiracies. If you have absolutely no questions or a few doubts about the offical account being 100% accurate, then you're one of the Ostrich People.
And aiming criticism at a few carefully chosen conspiracy theorists with outrageous claims does not weaken the argument of those who have carefully gathered evidence and offered up perplexing questions and scenarios that make people uncomfortable.
Do we - the laypeople - know every detail? No. Nor should we.

We do know the important parts, though. We know that a bunch of middle eastern men hijacked four planes and flew three of them into buildings. We know that two of the buildings collapsed as a result. We know who the major players were in planning the attack, and we know what's happened to them.

There are legitimate questions that could/should be answered as to what we might have known beforehand, and could it have been stopped, etc., but when someone starts talking "controlled demolition," "thermite," and the latest - "there were no planes," they are rightly classified as nuts, and one should only consider anything they have to say as being for entertainment purposes only.

 
Old 09-14-2011, 01:08 PM
 
Location: The cupboard under the sink
3,993 posts, read 8,968,888 times
Reputation: 8105
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
BTW, still waiting for you to cite the original source of your evidence that supports the thermite claim. Youtube videos need not be cited
You're not the only one. On more than one occasion on this thread I have asked for further information to support the claims he makes, but each time have been met by a repeat of a previous post, a change of subject, and/or a pathetic "your momma" response. Normally closed with a pointless quote.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
There will always be conspiracy theories as long as there are conspiracies. If you have absolutely no questions or a few doubts about the offical account being 100% accurate, then you're one of the Ostrich People.
And aiming criticism at a few carefully chosen conspiracy theorists with outrageous claims does not weaken the argument of those who have carefully gathered evidence and offered up perplexing questions and scenarios that make people uncomfortable.
You are corrrect. It is human nature to doubt.
Personally, there are a lot of questions which could be asked about 9/11 and surrounding events.
However, there's a huge difference between having doubts and nistrust, and having crazy paranoid theories which fly in the face of all conventional wisdom, and then to continue blindly to support these theories even when they have been disproved and discredited.
 
Old 09-14-2011, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,797 posts, read 24,283,603 times
Reputation: 15148
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
The evidence is out there...
Then cite it. "It's out there," right? Should be easy for you to identify the origin of the claim. You're the one espousing it, so the onus is on you to provide those you're engaging with the evidence. Youtube videos of TV interviews are not evidence - they're interviews. Cite the original source.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Like the other poster said... You're one of the ostrich people...
Personal attacks.... Getting desperate, I see.

By the way, why no quotes at the end of every post anymore?
 
Old 09-14-2011, 01:17 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,069,560 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Then cite it. "It's out there," right? Should be easy for you to identify the origin of the claim. You're the one espousing it, so the onus is on you to provide those you're engaging with the evidence. Youtube videos of TV interviews are not evidence - they're interviews. Cite the original source.



Personal attacks.... Getting desperate, I see.

By the way, why no quotes at the end of every post anymore?

Like I said... Google "thermite" or "thermate" and WTC...

Oh Yeah...

Last edited by CaseyB; 09-14-2011 at 01:27 PM.. Reason: no manual sigs
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top