Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Watch Hidden Colors to find the answer to this thread.
Which video exactly do they mention the "answer to this thread" tried to watch it but not very interesting "victim mindset" comes off immediately sorry have no patience for whining and paranoid conspiracy theories.
Which video exactly do they mention the "answer to this thread" tried to watch it but not very interesting "victim mindset" comes off immediately sorry have no patience for whining and paranoid conspiracy theories.
Well, most of the people replying on this forum are in denial about the Moors being black.
In denial? Why do you want them to be black?
They certainly have subafricans, but they are as alien as subsaharans in Australia.
Blacks in marrocco are a minority, as in the Us...they are into music.
There are also mulattoes, descendant of slaves that arrived during the 16th century.
Just had to say this was a pretty funny and ridiculous thread.
I saw that Africans are not "black" and that black/brown skinned Africans are not "negroid."
Too many of you are way too obessessed with a "white/black" historical narrative.
The Moors IMO were black. I base this on the European (white) painters who depicted them in paintings/drawings in the 1100s and 1200s as black skinned persons.
The fact that you all are arguing about it, when Europeans portrayed them as black and described them as such from AD700 and forward is pretty hilarious.
The real question IMO is why won't you admit that they are black.
Negroid and African is not a factor in the discussion. Europeans described them and depicted them as black. I believe their first hand depictions and descriptions. What is such a travesty about believing the actual pictures and descriptions of people from the 8th century forward. It is very odd.
Just had to say this was a pretty funny and ridiculous thread.
I saw that Africans are not "black" and that black/brown skinned Africans are not "negroid."
Too many of you are way too obessessed with a "white/black" historical narrative.
The Moors IMO were black. I base this on the European (white) painters who depicted them in paintings/drawings in the 1100s and 1200s as black skinned persons.
The fact that you all are arguing about it, when Europeans portrayed them as black and described them as such from AD700 and forward is pretty hilarious.
The real question IMO is why won't you admit that they are black.
Negroid and African is not a factor in the discussion. Europeans described them and depicted them as black. I believe their first hand depictions and descriptions. What is such a travesty about believing the actual pictures and descriptions of people from the 8th century forward. It is very odd.
It sounds like you really really want them to have been black(negroid) for whatever reason.
Your arguments for the black Moors are the same old tired arguments which includes the "core belief" not based on any proof that the Moors were black and those that won't admit it are in denial because of bla bla bla!(they don't like black people). Sounds like you have swallowed the "white/black" narrative.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.