Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-12-2012, 09:11 PM
 
2,920 posts, read 2,797,827 times
Reputation: 624

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanologist View Post
The ugly black boxes could block your view of the ESB and Chrysler in Manhattan. Real skyscrapers need no spires.
They could block yet comaped to Chrysler and ESB they are ugly.

 
Old 07-12-2012, 09:12 PM
 
2,920 posts, read 2,797,827 times
Reputation: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
Says the person who's obviously never been to the city or seen all the architecture downtown.

Not saying I don't love NYC - but this post and the one after are just silly.
But of course, if I don't like I haven't seen it, right? You're such a Homer
 
Old 07-12-2012, 09:39 PM
 
Location: NYC
2,545 posts, read 3,298,616 times
Reputation: 1924
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel12 View Post
Really? What would be the equivalent of Chrysler in Chicago. Haven't seen anything like it. Tribune building its nice but not in the same class.

And yes I think both Sears and Hancock are ugly...
Nobody cares what you think. Chicago is home to some of the most iconic skyscrapers in the world designed by some of the greatest architects in the world. You are criticizing a city that is the gold standard for modern architecture. Makes you look pretty dumb.
 
Old 07-12-2012, 11:02 PM
 
2,920 posts, read 2,797,827 times
Reputation: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzrovian View Post
Nobody cares what you think. Chicago is home to some of the most iconic skyscrapers in the world designed by some of the greatest architects in the world. You are criticizing a city that is the gold standard for modern architecture. Makes you look pretty dumb.
Oh really? I am not entitled to an opinion now?

I just don't like the boxes and besides them most people areound the world would be hard pressed to name even one. New York has just more famous buildings
 
Old 07-13-2012, 12:10 AM
 
1,092 posts, read 1,504,621 times
Reputation: 822
New York really has two downtowns so it's kind of an unfair comparison. I would probably say NY's is better with everything that it offers, but Chicago's downtown isn't really like NY's anyway. They're both different in their own way.
 
Old 07-13-2012, 12:36 AM
 
1,564 posts, read 1,671,381 times
Reputation: 522
Chicago downtown is beautiful amazing skyline but it's loses points on having the nickname second city putting itself under New york or L.A but far as downtown go it's very hard to beat N.Y but it's all a matter of opinion
 
Old 07-13-2012, 12:42 AM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,704,020 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobe25 View Post
Chicago downtown is beautiful amazing skyline but it's loses points on having the nickname second city putting itself under New york or L.A but far as downtown go it's very hard to beat N.Y but it's all a matter of opinion
I actually heard that Chi was called "The second city" because it had to be rebuilt after the fire. Pretty cool name if you ask me.
 
Old 07-13-2012, 12:45 AM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,704,020 times
Reputation: 5872
To me Midtown & Lower Manhattan are better then Chicago as far as things to see and do, but DTC is just really pretty to me. Chicago kind of reminds me of DT Houston ×10.
 
Old 07-13-2012, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Earth
2,549 posts, read 3,980,930 times
Reputation: 1218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Chicago kind of reminds me of DT Houston ×10.
Downtown Houston doesn't have the kind of large dense mountainous skyline full of 19th century buildings that Chicago has. The lack of it shows the contrast.
 
Old 07-13-2012, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Earth
2,549 posts, read 3,980,930 times
Reputation: 1218
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel12 View Post
They could block yet comaped to Chrysler and ESB they are ugly.
If you really think about it Manhattan has more of those ugly boxes than Chicago making it look bigger.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top