Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-24-2023, 01:58 PM
 
Location: 32°19'03.7"N 106°43'55.9"W
9,375 posts, read 20,811,922 times
Reputation: 9987

Advertisements

I just signed it. Not because it's political. I am an animal lover have two cats and a dog, plus serve on the boards of directors for two non-profit animal rescue shelter. It's the right thing to do. No animal should have to lose their life this way. That photo is heartbreaking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2023, 02:13 PM
 
1,291 posts, read 1,345,641 times
Reputation: 2724
Quote:
Originally Posted by njrebel1978 View Post
Mayors of several coastal towns have also confirmed that these deaths have never happened at such high frequency before.
Agreed. and signed.
If they insist it's NOT the farms, then halt them for 6 months and see if the deaths continue. easy solution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2023, 02:17 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
158 posts, read 121,763 times
Reputation: 165
The rapid industrialization of the Atlantic Coastline will come as a shock to most people. The BOEM is rushing approvals of up to 25 wind farm projects on the East Coast that may include over 3,000 giant turbines occupying 2.3 million acres of Atlantic Ocean waters.

30+ offshore power substations will be built in the ocean.

9,000 miles of cable will be buried under the ocean floor and under beaches to reach the Grid.

Years of offshore drilling, explosives, and mechanical operations with dozens of ships as steel pilings are jack hammered into the seabed.

400+ 1,074 foot tall wind turbines located 9 miles and ending 25 miles off shore will be clearly visible from the beach during the day and at night as each will have 5 flashing red lights illuminated at night.

The developers have acknowledged that the wind turbines off the coast would become the dominant feature in the seascape. 400+ turbines at 1047 ft tall will be located 9 miles out and ending 25 miles off shore. Clearly visible from the beach during the day, and at night as they will have up to 5 red lights illuminated.

There will be huge economic and environmental impacts from this. People will be shocked.


Last edited by NJWestWoods; 03-24-2023 at 02:55 PM.. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2023, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,147 posts, read 9,036,439 times
Reputation: 18791
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46H View Post
Barry Myers never ran NOAA. When you make up stuff like this, everything else you write has zero credibility.

I guess you forgot about Trump trying to open up the East coast to off shore drilling.

"The Trump administration said Thursday it would allow new offshore oil and gas drilling in nearly all United States coastal waters, giving energy companies access to leases off California for the first time in decades and opening more than a billion acres in the Arctic and along the Eastern Seaboard."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/c...-drilling.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN28E037

https://www.northjersey.com/story/ne...ry/1003753001/

https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news...-20180104.html


So offshore windmills bad, offshore drilling good.
Sounds like what Biden is doing in the last undisturbed land mass in Alaska.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2023, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,147 posts, read 9,036,439 times
Reputation: 18791
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJWestWoods View Post
The rapid industrialization of the Atlantic Coastline will come as a shock to most people. The BOEM is rushing approvals of up to 25 wind farm projects on the East Coast that may include over 3,000 giant turbines occupying 2.3 million acres of Atlantic Ocean waters.

30+ offshore power substations will be built in the ocean.

9,000 miles of cable will be buried under the ocean floor and under beaches to reach the Grid.

Years of offshore drilling, explosives, and mechanical operations with dozens of ships as steel pilings are jack hammered into the seabed.

400+ 1,074 foot tall wind turbines located 9 miles and ending 25 miles off shore will be clearly visible from the beach during the day and at night as each will have 5 flashing red lights illuminated at night.

The developers have acknowledged that the wind turbines off the coast would become the dominant feature in the seascape. 400+ turbines at 1047 ft tall will be located 9 miles out and ending 25 miles off shore. Clearly visible from the beach during the day, and at night as they will have up to 5 red lights illuminated.

There will be huge economic and environmental impacts from this. People will be shocked.

9,000 miles of cable isn't much, sounds like a lot though. Google owns over 60,000 miles of cable. All told, there are more than 700,000 miles of submarine cables in use today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2023, 05:11 PM
 
15,448 posts, read 7,511,039 times
Reputation: 19386
Quote:
Originally Posted by njrebel1978 View Post
NOAA funds and supports these liberal projects that actually hurt the ocean's environment. It is obvious where they stand politically.

https://www.noaa.gov/offshore-wind-energy
NOAA does not fund these projects. If you can prove that NOAA does fund projects, let's see the proof.

Humpback whale strandings and deaths have been happening for a while. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/natio...atlantic-coast
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2023, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Elizabeth, NJ
1,148 posts, read 862,689 times
Reputation: 1463
https://www.noaa.gov/offshore-wind-energy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2023, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Elizabeth, NJ
1,148 posts, read 862,689 times
Reputation: 1463
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
NOAA does not fund these projects. If you can prove that NOAA does fund projects, let's see the proof.

Humpback whale strandings and deaths have been happening for a while. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/natio...atlantic-coast
Sure they do! https://www.nationalfisherman.com/na...nd-and-fishing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2023, 05:33 PM
 
15,448 posts, read 7,511,039 times
Reputation: 19386
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJWestWoods View Post
The rapid industrialization of the Atlantic Coastline will come as a shock to most people. The BOEM is rushing approvals of up to 25 wind farm projects on the East Coast that may include over 3,000 giant turbines occupying 2.3 million acres of Atlantic Ocean waters.

30+ offshore power substations will be built in the ocean.

9,000 miles of cable will be buried under the ocean floor and under beaches to reach the Grid.

Years of offshore drilling, explosives, and mechanical operations with dozens of ships as steel pilings are jack hammered into the seabed.

400+ 1,074 foot tall wind turbines located 9 miles and ending 25 miles off shore will be clearly visible from the beach during the day and at night as each will have 5 flashing red lights illuminated at night.

The developers have acknowledged that the wind turbines off the coast would become the dominant feature in the seascape. 400+ turbines at 1047 ft tall will be located 9 miles out and ending 25 miles off shore. Clearly visible from the beach during the day, and at night as they will have up to 5 red lights illuminated.

There will be huge economic and environmental impacts from this. People will be shocked.

Boo hoo. Here's a map of the Gulf of Mexico, which has been industrialized since the late 1940's. Each of the red dots is an offshore installation https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/gulf-...e%20Structures

There are thousands of platforms in the Gulf, and no evidence of any impact on whales and dolphins, except when there's an oil spill, which is much more likely than any accidents involving wind turbines. Installing those platforms involved hammering in piles, laying flow lines, drilling wells, and a bunch of other related activities.

Who cares if wind turbines are visible from the beach? On my list of annoying things, that's way down towards the bottom.

Here's a link to a picture of the Bullwinkle platform being towed out to be set in place. It's 1500+ feet tall, most of it is under water https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullwi...546531185).jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2023, 05:41 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
158 posts, read 121,763 times
Reputation: 165
The federal government is all in on Big Wind.

Check out this US Dept of Energy document detailing the government's effort to move the US Wind Energy Industry forward. The Funding Fact Sheet

Incentives, Partnerships, Tax Credits, Financial Assistance, Grants, etc.

https://www.energy.gov/sites/default...eet-feb-23.pdf

Your tax dollars at work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top