Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
From my life expirience I know, that when someone suposdly rich start to sell their family herlums in bullks, it's mean they need money very fast. Nobody would sell all their herlums, just to feed their philanthropycal urgies. It's something else she need to cover. People philanthropycally gave away money not all at once, but step by step. This money want to get read of all family pictures at once, and pretend it for philanthropy to not pay big taxes. But in reallity they just need money andnothing more. How she would live her life, when she would be too old and have no money? Did she think about her own future? Looks like not. It's sad, when family of artists is so stupid, that they cant keep their pictures for future generations. No philanthropy deserve this. It's not rebellious, it's simple disrespect and this pictures should be not left to her, but to museum or country he live in. Not to selfish idiot, who pretend she is philanthropest. - comment on the New York Times facebook page about Marina Picasso.
"yea because who wants to sit next to someone who just went outside to smoke and have to breath in there stank."
This sentence has so many errors I had to breath deeply several times to comprehend it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.