Which places/cities do you think have vegetation many perceive as mismatch with what the climate's like (rainfall, historically)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I suspect Orkney being 'treeless' will have a lot to do with grazing and deforestation. There are plenty of trees in Kirkwall, and they're not stunted.
Parts of New Zealand look receive snow in the winter yet look almost tropical
Edmonton (Alberta, Canada) has vegetation that looks a lot more "far-north" than what would be expected in a location with Edmonton's climate
Singapore and Darwin (Northern Territory, Australia) look much less tropical than they are
Parts of New Zealand look receive snow in the winter yet look almost tropical
Edmonton (Alberta, Canada) has vegetation that looks a lot more "far-north" than what would be expected in a location with Edmonton's climate
Singapore and Darwin (Northern Territory, Australia) look much less tropical than they are
Agree about NZ.
Joe90 gets regular frosts in winter but very subtropical and can grow
almost anything, key I guess is only a couple of degrees below freezing.
What is it about Edmonton vegetation that looks "far north" ?
Averages in the warmest month are 23/12 though. I would assume temps above 90 F happen maybe once or twice a year. Summer is rather mild, with very cold winters that can have some very intense cold snaps (record low of -49 C!).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.