Rolling Stone Magazine....seriously? (illegal, statistics, carry, firearms)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh, I don't know. He is young. He clearly idolized his brother. People have committed crimes with less motivation. Surely we can imagine the pleas of "if you really love me, you'll do this..." His parents were gone, who else did he have?
Sometimes things really are that black and white, especially when talking about teenagers.
Anyway, I'll probably pick up a copy too.
You buy your copy of Rolling Stone with an air-brushed portrait of a murderer. And the next time some idiot decides to pull some **** like this, knowing that no matter how malicious or murderous his actions are, or how many victims he takes with him, that he will live in eternal pop-culture infamy, just know; that one is partly on you.
He's hot, you can't deny that. Doesn't bother me that he's on the cover, it wouldn't make me buy the magazine anyway. I never really read Rolling Stone, maybe a few times back in the day if there was a certain article about a band that I liked, but I never consistently bought & read it.
I don't see it, of course I'm a guy, however I do recognize that he is a good looking a--hole.
You buy your copy of Rolling Stone with an air-brushed portrait of a murderer. And the next time some idiot decides to pull some **** like this, knowing that no matter how malicious or murderous his actions are, or how many victims he takes with him, that he will live in eternal pop-culture infamy, just know; that one is partly on you.
Uh-huh.
It will be on me just like the next guy who shoots up a school or movie theater or park or... will be on all of those who refuse to accept additional gun regulations.
You buy your copy of Rolling Stone with an air-brushed portrait of a murderer. And the next time some idiot decides to pull some **** like this, knowing that no matter how malicious or murderous his actions are, or how many victims he takes with him, that he will live in eternal pop-culture infamy, just know; that one is partly on you.
I disagree, It not analogy when I am pointing out its a fact Dzhokhar being on cover of Rolling Stone is no different than when Charles Manson was on the cover.
Just because someone is a killer doesnt change their physical sexiness and Dzhokhar is except I would trim his hair. Even Timothy McVeigh, Scott Peterson and Jeffery Dahmer was kinda cute. For females Amanda Knox, Megan Martez, Andrea Yates are real pretty.
Any of these can be on the cover on a magazine as before internet there wouldnt be a big deal over this as print media was king.
I just do not see what the big deal is as each of these pictures are shown on the news but now print media isnt allowed?
The point is there is no reason to censor just because a few dont like it. Let consumers decide. It just a head shot.
Thing is he is attractive. Psychopaths can be good looking. It'd be nice if they were all ugly as river rats, wouldn't it?
A cop got pissed at what Rolling Stone did and let a this photo out.....
And now he's getting punished????????
Quote:
Massachusetts State Police photographer Sgt. Sean Murphy is
relieved of duty after releasing photos of the Boston Marathon bombing suspect
moments before his capture to Boston Magazine in response to what some perceive
as a glamorous Rolling Stone magazine cover.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.