Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have no agenda. I consider myself a classical liberal. I believe in; the rule of law, due process, individual liberties, limited government, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and free markets among other things. I believe hayek was right when he equated socialism with a form of serfdom.
If others believe in different forms of socialist governments. Ok. I'm not responsible for that.
These are all values that resonate with the American ideal. We should cherish them and foster them. I agree on all levels. There also exists a national moral contract that mandates that our nation is responsibile for all it's people. Their life, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness. There is a balance between our individual liberties and our moral contract.
These are all values that resonate with the American ideal. We should cherish them and foster them. I agree on all levels. There also exists a national moral contract that mandates that our nation is responsibile for all it's people. Their life, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness. There is a balance between our individual liberties and our moral contract.
Because being anti-semitic doesn't make one a Neo-Nazi White Supremacist and 1 person doesn't epitomize an entire movement
No, but it does make one a racist. This is something I believe many neo-nazi white supremacists are. Of course you don't have to be white....to be a racist.
I merely provided an article indicating antisemitism was present at an occupy wall street protest. It was germain to the topic you introduced. After all you expressed the fear, uncorroborated, that the republican party may become racist. Shouldn't you provide some support for your contentions? Wouldn't that be considered "serious?"
I said the far-right, it is possible for both sides to have things be too extreme. As for the attitudes of those within Occupy, there were decent people within that movement, but there were also those that had little interest in any form of political power and I am sure there were some that were racist as well, it was an organization that was loosely started on the idea of the collective population rather than political parties. It was an organization that had plenty of liberal roots, but in the end it never amounted to much more than a footnote in history and has shown to have little impact on becoming any form of political power. (which is actually kind of sad, the group really needed to let go the notion of no leader and push for key voices...though on the other end, it was a great example of moving further towards communism in the sense that it was a group that was about a collective voice and the act of sharing everything.)
If you want me to provide support, you will have to wait, it is late here and I don't feel like hunting for links.
In an attempt to link occupiers with White Supremacists you post a video of a Black woman. Your posts lack substance and basically are just catch phrases and one liners, lefists hate freedom, nazis are liberal, etc.... Pure nonsense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
