Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-29-2008, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,612,700 times
Reputation: 1680

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike from back east View Post
Delusianne, thanks for at least trying to get people on the same sheet of music regards WHAT is socialism. Heres a decent example:

From Wikipedia: "Socialism refers to any of various economic and political concepts of state or collective public ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods and services...."

The entry runs on at great length, but the GIST of socialism is PUBLIC ownership of the MEANS of production and distribution.

Are the Feds running GM, Ford, GE, Microsoft?
Are the Feds delivering things to your door in shiny brown trucks?
Does your paycheck say Federal Farm Cooperative Number 11349, or Federal Bar and Grill?

I think not.

We're as FAR from being a socialist nation as is possible.

Providing health care to all people is not an exercise in Federal control of production or distribution. Paying the bill for all citizens, in a one-for-all-and all-for-one democratic matter is not socialism or re-distribution of wealth (ROW). But it is a purely constitutional mandate for "life, liberty and the pursuit .... provide for the common defense, promote the General Welfare.... "

There are people and religions who are against all war, but their taxes pay for national defense. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.

Some religions don't believe in modern medicine, but their taxes pay for Medicare / Medicaid. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.

There are people who don't own vehicles, but their taxes pay for building and policing roads. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.

The majority of people don't use public transit, but their taxes pay for buses and subways. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.

Is any candidate saying they want to see the Government take over farms, manufacturing, trucking, railroads, supermarkets or millions of small mom and pop businesses and run them? Hell no.

Do we need to balance the budget by rescinding Bush's unneeded and disastrous tax cuts. Yes, most of them.

But every time someone mentions health care, someone else spouts off that "we CANT do thaaaaaaaat, it's socialism." No it isn't. It isn't socialism, it isn't communism. Medicare and Medicaid are not socialism. But is it the MOST christian thing we can do for our fellow man. And it's the MOST American way of looking out for one another.
And this is the gist of Exactly how and what President Lincoln felt.
The Government exists to do collectively what we cannot do as well individually.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2008, 11:57 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,183,867 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViewFromThePeak View Post
I can only hope what you're saying is true.

Federally subsidized money to help out communities is highly inefficient, as Katrina has proved.
In the words of George Leroy Tirebiter, "I never lie,and I'm always right."

There, now that I've soothed your fears, you mentioned Katrina: want to ratchet them back up again?

2006: CNN.com - Is New Orleans ready for another Katrina? - May 22, 2006
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 12:02 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,183,867 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike from back east View Post
We're as FAR from being a socialist nation as is possible.

Providing health care to all people is not an exercise in Federal control of production or distribution. Paying the bill for all citizens, in a one-for-all-and all-for-one democratic matter is not socialism or re-distribution of wealth (ROW). But it is a purely constitutional mandate for "life, liberty and the pursuit .... provide for the common defense, promote the General Welfare.... "

There are people and religions who are against all war, but their taxes pay for national defense. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.

Some religions don't believe in modern medicine, but their taxes pay for Medicare / Medicaid. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.

There are people who don't own vehicles, but their taxes pay for building and policing roads. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.

The majority of people don't use public transit, but their taxes pay for buses and subways. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.

Is any candidate saying they want to see the Government take over farms, manufacturing, trucking, railroads, supermarkets or millions of small mom and pop businesses and run them? Hell no.

Do we need to balance the budget by rescinding Bush's unneeded and disastrous tax cuts. Yes, most of them.

But every time someone mentions health care, someone else spouts off that "we CANT do thaaaaaaaat, it's socialism." No it isn't. It isn't socialism, it isn't communism. Medicare and Medicaid are not socialism. But is it the MOST christian thing we can do for our fellow man. And it's the MOST American way of looking out for one another.
Best post of the day, week, month, year. Should be a Sticky. Great job Mike.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 12:23 PM
 
Location: New England
8,155 posts, read 21,023,838 times
Reputation: 3338
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Reagan also couldn't remember selling weapons to an enemy state so I have to question his judgment.
He had the beginning stages of alzheimer's during that time...show some respect for a former sitting president, please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Cary, NC
1,113 posts, read 1,816,221 times
Reputation: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by JViello View Post
He had the beginning stages of alzheimer's during that time...show some respect for a former sitting president, please.
Luckily Bush doesn't have a doctor's note to hide behind, so we can make fun of him as much as we want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 12:27 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,340 posts, read 54,462,599 times
Reputation: 40741
Quote:
Originally Posted by JViello View Post
He had the beginning stages of alzheimer's during that time...show some respect for a former sitting president, please.


So, a man with access to the finest medical care in the world and this alleged onset of disease was unknown?

IF it was known he should have stepped down but didn't, if it didn't exist he was imvolved in a treasonous act. WHY should I respect either course of action?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 12:30 PM
 
646 posts, read 1,640,357 times
Reputation: 200
I love how the government privatizes the profits of these huge banks and yet puts the debt on the backs of the American people. Now if we can do this for the banks, why can't we help the American people???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 12:32 PM
 
237 posts, read 299,231 times
Reputation: 44
I havent read all of this thread, but here is my rant: the govt has been giving money only to high earners, we agree on that, and we are in bad shape because they are a bunch of tightwads who already had enough and dont want to spend any, and therefore you have slow economy. what bush should have done, is give money to those who are known high spenders: young people, single mothers, children _hey the like to spend- instead they keep doing the political things rather than the expedient and smart thing.

I hear th em loud and clear on this board. they want more money so they can continue to sit on it and do nothing with it. they dont need anything, except a shiny new coffin which we should provide for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 12:44 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,989,154 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike from back east View Post
There are people and religions who are against all war, but their taxes pay for national defense. Is that an "unfair" ROW? No.
National Defence does not = War.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 01:08 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,340 posts, read 54,462,599 times
Reputation: 40741
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkrocker27ka View Post
I love how the government privatizes the profits of these huge banks and yet puts the debt on the backs of the American people. Now if we can do this for the banks, why can't we help the American people???


Helping the banks and corporations is politics.

Helping the people would be, sit down and cower in fear..............SOCIALISM!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top