Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are posting convenient clips. I was a middle class working American who worked my way up and I am now American dream and I am not ashamed of it.
Trying to take this opportunity away from others is self serving and greedy of you and of Obama. I hope many others can make their American dream come true. Nobody considers collecting welfare a dream life.
When you vote for Obama vote your kids and grandkids opportunity down the crapper. That is greedy and selfish.
MTAtech, there is nothing wrong with making money so get off your socialistic high horse.
I want what is best for the country. I have family that is middle class working American. MTAtech, there is nothing wrong with making money so get off your high horse.
I am not on a high horse. My post was to illustrate that you don't know what socialism is but use it as a curse word.
As such, you can't characterize Mr. Obama as a Socialist when you don't know what Socialism is.
The discussion of your misuse of the word 'Socialism' has nothing to do with what you want for your family.
I'll vote for Obama and the redistribution of income that the country has been practicing for more than 60 years.
...over what Romney wants, to redistribute national income upward. Eliminate environmental regulations so the cost of industrial pollution isn't borne by the industry but by the public at large; cut financial regulation, so the financial industry won't be prevented from bilking the public; and, cut taxes on the wealthy and pass the cost of running the government to the middle class.
Both the Democratic Party and Republican Party are for wealth redistribution. The difference is that Democrats would like to see the wealth distributed to the poor and middle class. The Republicans would like to see the wealth distributed to the wealthy.
In a pure socialist society, how would you enforce everyone contributing at an equal level? Specifically those that just flat out don't want to be bothered working/contributing?
Is there even such a thing as a pure socialist society?
Notice I did not mention the middle class. Do you think I left that out for a reason? The middle class will be a thing of the past. Middle class will be moved to welfare rolls. It is already happening. More people are on welfare today then before. There is already a 40% jump.
So you still have no idea what socialism means.....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
