Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2012, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,436 posts, read 6,312,545 times
Reputation: 3827

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
Sure, Tampa truly feels bigger than South Florida. DFW feels bigger than The Bay Area???

Puhlease.
Actually if you combine the MSA of San Jose and the MSA of San Fran, DFW does have more people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2012, 10:25 PM
 
Location: Burlington, Colorado
350 posts, read 848,975 times
Reputation: 504
I disagree, unless you consider the "metro" area to include rural areas or even other smaller cities 50 or even 100's of miles away. Toledo's market includes places like Findlay 50 miles away, or Phoenix includes Flagstaff and Prescott over 100 miles away, which are in no way considered part of the metro. Then look at Albuquerque, Denver, or Salt Lake City which include nearly entire states or more.

See a map of the markets:

TV Market Maps
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2012, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,976,721 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by R1070 View Post
Actually if you combine the MSA of San Jose and the MSA of San Fran, DFW does have more people.
Table of United States Combined Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2012, 10:13 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,134 posts, read 7,586,619 times
Reputation: 5796
Quote:
Originally Posted by knke0204 View Post
TV Markets
1) NYC
2) Los Angeles
3) Chicago
4) Philadelphia
5) Dallas-Ft. Worth
6) San Francisco - Oakland - San Jose
7) Boston
8) Washington DC

9) Atlanta
10) Houston
11) Detroit
12) Seattle - Tacoma
13) Phoenix
14) Tampa - St. Petersburg
15) Minneapolis - St. Paul
16) Miami - Ft. Lauderdale
17) Denver
18) Cleveland
19) Orlando
20) Sacramento

MSA'S
1) NYC
2) Los Angeles
3) Chicago
4) Dallas - Ft. Worth
5) Philadelphia
6) Houston
7) Washington DC
8) Miami - Ft. Lauderdale
9) Atanta
10) Boston
11) San Francisco
12) Detroit
13) Riverside- San Bernardino
14) Phoenix
15) Seattle - Tacoma
16) Minneapolis - St. Paul
17) San Diego
18) St. Louis
19) Tampa- St. Petersburg
20) Baltimore

Any correlation?
The Boston region although it is a good size, is not truly bigger than DC's therefore this is not the best representation of size.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2012, 10:50 PM
 
Location: Detroit
3,671 posts, read 5,893,187 times
Reputation: 2692
Damn. I didn't know Pittsburgh was the largest city in the world. Over 1 Billion? 1/6 of the entire worlds population? No other city in the world comes close lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2012, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
1,580 posts, read 2,901,674 times
Reputation: 1717
I wouldn't say this is the "best" way to judge the size of various metros, but it is certainly an interesting piece of the puzzle. TV markets definitely give some idea of the media power of each market.

Looking at the top 25 a few things jump out at me:

(1) how low Miami is. Crazy that it is below places like Seattle, Tampa and the Twin cities.

(2) surprise that LA is so much bigger than Chicago (the gap between LA and Chicago is bigger than the gap between LA and NYC). But I guess if anyplace would be well represented in the media, it makes sense that LA is up there.

(3) surprise that Raleigh-Durham is slightly larger than Charlotte
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2012, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,765,743 times
Reputation: 10592
Actually R1070 is right.

The Bay Area CSA includes the San Francisco, San Jose, Vallejo, Santa Cruz, Napa, and Santa Rosa MSA's.

Just the San Francisco and San Jose MSA's together add up to 6,172,302. DFW is about 6.3 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2012, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,436 posts, read 6,312,545 times
Reputation: 3827
CSA is a different definition. If SJ and SF combined to form one metro it would be around the size of Houston Metro roughly. With CA being more heavily populated outside of main urban areas CSA's can group together many areas to form one large area. If the census did decide to combine the bay area into one metro it would not be the same size as its current CSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2012, 11:45 PM
 
Location: C.R. K-T
6,202 posts, read 11,461,356 times
Reputation: 3814
Quote:
Originally Posted by rainrock View Post
Quite frankly Radio Markets tend to be a misleading barometer. Within Philadelphias TV Market there are 9 seperate radio submarkets.

Philadelphia
Reading
Allentown
Wimington
Trenton
Vineland
Atlantic City
Dover
Lancaster

I believe we should stick with TV Markets for aguments sake.
FM radio in the North and California have a maximum of 50,000 watts @ 150 meters due to the closeness of major cities such as Philadelphia and NYC. The rest of the country has a maximum of 100,000 watts @ 600 meters such as Houston, San Antonio, Austin, and Dallas.

If Philadelphia had the 100,000 watts @ 600 meters instead, it would be one united market (unless the South Mountain blocks FM and TV from Roxborough). If DFW had the 50,000 watts @ 150 meters instead, there would be separate Dallas and Fort Worth markets and probably Denton and Greenville markets.

I use the 100 km rule - a radius from the city center stretching out 100 km to cover the city, suburbs, and (near) rural areas. A much better indicator of the limits of a car driven on the freeway for one hour, which by the way is how most Americans get to work. (Guess what they listen to on the way?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 01:46 AM
 
1,108 posts, read 2,289,117 times
Reputation: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by R1070 View Post
Actually if you combine the MSA of San Jose and the MSA of San Fran, DFW does have more people.
That is incorrect. The CSA is the combination of the SF-Oakland MSA and the San Jose MSA:

SF/Oakland/SJ CSA- 7.5 million

DFW CSA - 6.7 Million
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top