Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2011, 01:52 PM
 
Location: NY, NY
1,219 posts, read 1,755,398 times
Reputation: 1225

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rotodome View Post
The 7 train stops right at the stadium, and runs express from Midtown - doesn't get much better than that for rail access. No less convenient than the BSL Pattison stop, for example. A little further ride than to Yankees Stadium (depending on where you're coming from), but you can't hold NYC being a big city against the Mets. Especially when there's so much other better stuff to hold against them.
And there is a LIRR train stop at Citi Field which you can catch right from Penn Station.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2011, 02:46 PM
 
5,802 posts, read 9,893,724 times
Reputation: 3051
Quote:
Originally Posted by wpipkins View Post
Pittsburgh's North Shore Connector will connect the Golden Triange with the North Shore starting in 2012. The new line tunneled under the Allegheny river to connect Gateway Center with PNC Park, Heinz Field, Rivers Casino, and the other North Shore attractions. The new stations are located @ PNC Park and the Heinz Field station is connected directly to the stadium.
With a lot of people poo poo'ing the NEC....Little do they realize once its finished the North Shore growth with explode in a short amount of time.

btw PNC on game day...It really doesn't need rail access..



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 03:14 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbeauty212 View Post
With a lot of people poo poo'ing the NEC....Little do they realize once its finished the North Shore growth with explode in a short amount of time.

btw PNC on game day...It really doesn't need rail access..



Love those views, really need to make the trip to see the stadium
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
1,975 posts, read 5,212,438 times
Reputation: 1943
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
.You look at Cleveland, Houston, St Louis, Seattle, Baltimore, St Pete, Phoenix etc and you just don’t see a lot of eco development around the parks even after years (or even decades) of the parks being downtown.
In terms of Cleveland this statement is 100% false. The downtown baseball stadium (along with the basketball arena built at the same time) in Cleveland totally revitalized a wasteland portion of downtown. The construction of the baseball stadium was followed by new hotels, apartments, and a new dining and nightlife district that is now patronized even when no game is going on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Also how many stadiums have good rail access?

Off the top of my head Yankees, Red Sox, Phillies, Nationals, Cubs (not sure on White Sox)

To a lessor extent Baltimore (but light rail), Atlanta (MARTA is far and limited to very select areas for connectivity), SF (street car only)
There is a rail stop located a few of blocks from the ballpark in Cleveland as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 04:41 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,898,942 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
I read an article on this. It has to do with the streetfronts in the area. Most buildings either have a solid wall or a parking garage facing the street fronts in that area. Since there is noting to go into, there is no reason for people to be there and thus no reason for activity.

would you go around looking at walls or cars???

They suggested street level stores and restaurants to increase activity. Otherwise people would drive to the park, catch a game and just drive home.

They also said that the only thing that spurred activity in the area was the park.
Sucks....

I go to Minute Maid sometimes and (as an architect major and BIG fan of urban-living) I hate seeing more parking spaces facing the park than buildings. There's even that old hotel there that's just a huge eyesore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,166,939 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablo234 View Post
So far in my experience the ballparks in Cleveland, Minneapolis, Chicago (Wrigley Field only), Baltimore, Denver, and San Diego seemed to have contributed to the vibrancy in the surrounding neighborhoods.
The Wrigley Field situation is a symbiotic relationship, and if anything you may have the cart before the horse. The area around it is one of the city's busiest nightlife districts (if not actually the busiest) even during the off-season, and the seamless integration of the stadium itself into the surrounding built environment (rather than being offset by acres of parking lots) has made Wrigley Field itself part of the entertainment/nightlife scene. The Cubs didn't start selling 30,000+ tickets per game regardless of the team's suckage until Wrigleyville became a yuppie playground. The stadium itself is indeed part of the attraction, but the neighborhood makes Wrigley Field an attraction at least as much as Wrigley Field makes the neighborhood an attraction. In fact the nightlife in the area is so much an attraction in its own right that the Cubs are not allowed by ordinance to play night games on Friday and Saturday nights, because it's nigh impossible to manage the volume of people and traffic for both the games and the surrounding nightlife at the same time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Also how many stadiums have good rail access?

Off the top of my head Yankees, Red Sox, Phillies, Nationals, Cubs (not sure on White Sox)
White Sox too -- served by the same line that serves Wrigley. When they play each other it's referred to by some as the Red Line Series.

Last edited by Drover; 08-08-2011 at 05:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Grand Forks, ND
274 posts, read 705,736 times
Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
This is very interesting!

So the demand for parking actually discouraged the land from being developed till structured parking was built to replace any displaced parking?

Do you have any renderings or links for this project?
The project was delayed due to the recession and the difficulty of acquiring funding, not parking demand.

Here is the rendering for the first phase which just began construction:


Welcome to North Lot: Seattle

And this is the rendering for the whole project:


Welcome to North Lot: Seattle

I wouldn't be surprised to see some of the office towers in the second rendering converted to apartment buildings as the market for apartments is hot in Seattle right now. I read an article about how something like 90 percent of the apartments under construction in the entire Seattle area are in Seattle itself. The renderings show King Street Station where Sounder commuter rail runs from. The commuter rail is rush hour only, although special trains are run for Seahawk games, not sure about Mariner games. An arrow also points to the entrance to the International District Station in the bus tunnel where Seattle's light rail, and several bus routes run.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
You look at Cleveland, Houston, St Louis, Seattle, Baltimore, St Pete, Phoenix etc and you just don’t see a lot of eco development around the parks even after years (or even decades) of the parks being downtown.
Can't speak for the rest but in Seattle the stadiums are surrounded by water on the West side, an industrial zone on the South side, Pioneer Square, which is the closest Seattle has to a historical district, on the North Side, and the International District on the East side. There aren't exactly large tracts of undeveloped land surrounding the stadiums save for the North Lot.

Last edited by jaboyd1; 08-08-2011 at 05:52 PM.. Reason: added info
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 05:50 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,615,377 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by abr7rmj View Post
This is completely ridiculous, inaccurate, incorrect and a likely a purposeful misrepresentation of facts.

Great American Ball Park has spurred the development of an entirely new downtown neighborhood known as The Banks, which this summer is starting to open its doors. The first tenant to open - The Holy Grail - is absolutely smam-packed before and after every Reds game and has already announced expansion plans, and a slate of new-to-the-region tenants are slated to open this fall. Prior to the new ballpark, the Cincinnati riverfront was a mostly empty, ignored stretch of parking lots, produce warehouses and criss-crossing train tracks. In its place are now hundreds of new residential units that sold out long before they were move-in ready, new restaurants/bars/stores that are lining up to open later this year, and a series of completely new urban parks that are already winning awards and a new hotel development. Honestly, if this isn't development spurred by the ballpark, I don't know what is:

The Banks | Home

Upscale Ruth?s Chris looks to open steakhouse on Ohio River at the Banks - Business Courier

http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2...mes-into-focus

Smale Riverfront Park - Moerlein Lager House



So why didn't the old Riverfront stadium spur new development when it was "new" back in 1972?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 08:23 PM
 
413 posts, read 789,519 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by abr7rmj View Post
This is completely ridiculous, inaccurate, incorrect and a likely a purposeful misrepresentation of facts.

Great American Ball Park has spurred the development of an entirely new downtown neighborhood known as The Banks, which this summer is starting to open its doors. The first tenant to open - The Holy Grail - is absolutely smam-packed before and after every Reds game and has already announced expansion plans, and a slate of new-to-the-region tenants are slated to open this fall. Prior to the new ballpark, the Cincinnati riverfront was a mostly empty, ignored stretch of parking lots, produce warehouses and criss-crossing train tracks. In its place are now hundreds of new residential units that sold out long before they were move-in ready, new restaurants/bars/stores that are lining up to open later this year, and a series of completely new urban parks that are already winning awards and a new hotel development. Honestly, if this isn't development spurred by the ballpark, I don't know what is:

The Banks | Home

Upscale Ruth?s Chris looks to open steakhouse on Ohio River at the Banks - Business Courier

Moerlein Lager House comes into focus | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

Smale Riverfront Park - Moerlein Lager House
That's impressive. However, the average business in the US doesn't last five years. To conclude that this is successful development spurred by the ballpark we'll have to see how successful these new business are after they've been open for a couple of years. If the majority of them are still open and doing well, then this would be quite an achievement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 09:39 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,644,089 times
Reputation: 13630
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
People will say Denver and San Diego and San Francisco have growing gentrifying urban neighborhoods around them, but those areas (LoDo, Gaslight etc) were flourishing before the ballparks went in.
True, but I think they made these more vibrant and attracted development that might not have otherwise occurred had these ballparks not been built, at least with SF and SD. I don't think the area around AT&T would have taken off as much as it has without that park. Downtown SD was already improving but the ballpark definitely helped, I def don't think some developments would have occurred if Petco wasn't there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top