Where to move in Ohio - Cincinnati, Cleveland, or??? (Mason: real estate, movers)

[abr7rmj]

Originally Posted by kjbrill

TomJones123... They put in an inquiry about the schools in Shaker Heights near Cleveland. So let me hear your recommendations concerning neighborhoods in Cincinnati which can even hold a candle to Shaker Heights.

Mariemont can hold lots of candles. Though, since you never venture anywhere outside your insular little far-flung suburb 25 miles north of the city, I can imagine why you wouldn't recognize that.

Also, Shaker Heights is not a neighborhood in the City of Cleveland. It's a separate city.

[kjbrill]

Originally Posted by TomJones123

Nah, I'm not arguing with you.

Good idea, because there are none. Shaker Heights is like Indian Hill in Cincinnati, an enclave in and of itself. Hyde Park is a nice neighborhood, but Indian Hill it is not.

[WRosado]

Originally Posted by jonathancalderon71

Just out of curiosity, why does everybdoy on city data cleveland forum live in little italy, i looked it up on maps google and it is very small, its only like 5 or 6 blocks?

It's just that popular .

It's small, but very dense. We are in a very important part of the city, close to University Circle and its booming growth, and close to inner ring suburbs. I have yet to meet anyone on here from Little Italy, but I have only been a poster for a little while.

[abr7rmj]

Originally Posted by kjbrill

Good idea, because there are none. Shaker Heights is like Indian Hill in Cincinnati, an enclave in and of itself. Hyde Park is a nice neighborhood, but Indian Hill it is not.

Hyde Park isn't trying to be Indian Hill, or vice-versa. Hyde Park is a functional neighborhood with a shopping district, restaurants, a central square and other amenities and is one neighborhood in the larger city. Indian Hill is largely an isolated bedroom community with gigantic mansion homes surrounded by huge wooded properties. You're comparing apples and skyscrapers.

[WRosado]

Originally Posted by kjbrill

Good idea, because there are none. Shaker Heights is like Indian Hill in Cincinnati, an enclave in and of itself. Hyde Park is a nice neighborhood, but Indian Hill it is not.

Wow. Useless stuff like this, from one of your first posts in this thread, you have managed to turn it into this. Keep rambling. Sorry to the OP.

[TomJones123]

I've never been to Shaker Heights but from a cursory google search Shaker Heights is MUCH more urban than Indian Hill, which BARELY has the population to be considered a city instead of a village.

Shaker Heights
Population • Total 28,448 • Density 4,685.0/sq mi (1,808.9/km2)
Indian Hill
Population • Total 5,907 • Density 318.7/sq mi (123.1/km2)

Sounds like a huge difference to me. Like I said, grain of salt.

[kjbrill]

Originally Posted by TomJones123

I've never been to Shaker Heights but from a cursory google search Shaker Heights is MUCH more urban than Indian Hill, which BARELY has the population to be considered a city instead of a village.

Shaker Heights
Population • Total 28,448 • Density 4,685.0/sq mi (1,808.9/km2)
Indian Hill
Population • Total 5,907 • Density 318.7/sq mi (123.1/km2)

Sounds like a huge difference to me. Like I said, grain of salt.

So ask the people on the Cleveland Forum. Is Shaker heights one of the places to be or not? I knew it was a separate entity and not part of Cleveland, likely why it is so desirable. Indian Hill's lack of population density is one of the reasons it is so desired. A country atmosphere just outside of the City. And they go to great extents to keep it that way, including only upgrading the roads to a certain degree, as they do not want through traffic.

If Shaker Heights is considered an urban community, it is not because they desired it. Just too many people recognized a good thing and moved there. Sort of like Mason here in Cincinnati.

[TomJones123]

If Indian Hill is so desirable then why did it lose 2.1% of it's population between 2000 and 2010?

The Village of Indian Hill city, Ohio Census 2010 Results — Population


And here I am drawn into arguing with you anyways. I am finished now, have a few complimentary and unrelated to anything the OP wants posts on me!

[abr7rmj]

Originally Posted by kjbrill

So ask the people on the Cleveland Forum. Is Shaker heights one of the places to be or not? I knew it was a separate entity and not part of Cleveland, likely why it is so desirable. Indian Hill's lack of population density is one of the reasons it is so desired. A country atmosphere just outside of the City. And they go to great extents to keep it that way, including only upgrading the roads to a certain degree, as they do not want through traffic.

If Shaker Heights is considered an urban community, it is not because they desired it. Just too many people recognized a good thing and moved there. Sort of like Mason here in Cincinnati.

You've totally gone off the deep end. Mason? Do you honestly believe half the things you post?

[TomJones123]

Originally Posted by abr7rmj

You've totally gone off the deep end. Mason?

Oh come now, we all know that Cincinnati is located on the southern end of the Greater Mason Metropolitan Area.