Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-24-2017, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Seoul
11,554 posts, read 9,349,225 times
Reputation: 4660

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed's Mountain View Post
It can't be that since the hills were in all probability there before 2011.
Then not sure how it can be that Rochester has been above average since then in April while we have been below average each year. A couple of years it has been close, but -1.0 is still below average whether you like it or not. Similar in a way that May 2016 is still above average despite the negative anomalies the first three weeks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2017, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,589 posts, read 75,571,450 times
Reputation: 16657
It's coming. #Rain Loop last 4hrs. 5-9pm







Nothing big but maybe some local spots will get 2"+?


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Rochester, NY
2,197 posts, read 1,498,590 times
Reputation: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warszawa View Post
Then not sure how it can be that Rochester has been above average since then in April while we have been below average each year. A couple of years it has been close, but -1.0 is still below average whether you like it or not. Similar in a way that May 2016 is still above average despite the negative anomalies the first three weeks
The warmth was probably centered farther west or the cold centered farther east those years. It's also likely that there were local variations where +0.5 in Rochester turns into -0.5 in Binghamton as not everywhere will have the same anomaly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Seoul
11,554 posts, read 9,349,225 times
Reputation: 4660
The seasonable weather this week has dropped BGM to just +4.3 above average, still good for the 3rd warmest on record. Looking at the week ahead we should be able to pull back into second quite easily. The +6.1 from 2010 is a bit of a stretch, but well in reach with the warmth ahead. LGA is at +4.8 which is more than good enough for second warmest ever, and very close to the warmest ever too
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,589 posts, read 75,571,450 times
Reputation: 16657
Warm & Wet will be the thing April 2017.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 07:57 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
5,753 posts, read 3,539,544 times
Reputation: 2663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warszawa View Post
Then not sure how it can be that Rochester has been above average since then in April while we have been below average each year. A couple of years it has been close, but -1.0 is still below average whether you like it or not. Similar in a way that May 2016 is still above average despite the negative anomalies the first three weeks
I'm just saying the hills can't be to blame for differences since 2011. The hills were there before 2011; they're still there; they actually haven't changed. So any anomaly since 2011* must not be related to the hills.

Another way to express this is that the Binghamton averages take the hills into the account: any effect from the hills is built in.

--
*Would be nice to see references since there's all sorts of conflicting figures being tossed around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Seoul
11,554 posts, read 9,349,225 times
Reputation: 4660
Official statistcs

Rochester


2010: +6.1
2011: +0.1
2012: -0.4
2013: +0.3
2014: -0.2
2015: +1.3
2016: -4.0

Binghamton

2010: +6.1
2011: +1.1
2012: -0.6
2013: -1.0
2014: -0.3
2015: -0.5
2016: -3.0


Pretty close overall, but in 2013 and 2015 Binghamton had quite a bit colder anomalies than Rochester. Which explains why Rochester was above average while Binghamton was below in thos years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
5,753 posts, read 3,539,544 times
Reputation: 2663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warszawa View Post
Official statistcs

Rochester


2010: +6.1
2011: +0.1
2012: -0.4
2013: +0.3
2014: -0.2
2015: +1.3
2016: -4.0

Binghamton

2010: +6.1
2011: +1.1
2012: -0.6
2013: -1.0
2014: -0.3
2015: -0.5
2016: -3.0


Pretty close overall, but in 2013 and 2015 Binghamton had quite a bit colder anomalies than Rochester. Which explains why Rochester was above average while Binghamton was below in thos years
Cool, thanks. Looks just like random sampling to me but hard to tell with such a small sample.

However, even if Binghamton did get the short straw for a couple of years, that by itself doesn't support the assertion that "for people in the Northeast, this is the first above average April in half a decade".

I did find this map for April 2015. At the very least it illustrates Rochester in a red zone, Binghamton in blue. As far as the Northeast goes, I guess it depends where you draw the line but most of the major cities are in a red zone. However it's comparing to 20th century averages, not last 30 years.


Last edited by Ed's Mountain; 04-24-2017 at 08:33 PM.. Reason: Punctuation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Norman, OK
2,850 posts, read 1,976,362 times
Reputation: 892
We're supposed to have a high in the upper 80s tomorrow followed by a high in the mid 50s on Wednesday. I feel like that's what summer in Melbourne must be like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 04:00 AM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,589 posts, read 75,571,450 times
Reputation: 16657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed's Mountain View Post
Cool, thanks. Looks just like random sampling to me but hard to tell with such a small sample.

However, even if Binghamton did get the short straw for a couple of years, that by itself doesn't support the assertion that "for people in the Northeast, this is the first above average April in half a decade".

He's actually right and I didn't realize that.. Many of us in the northeast/New England haven't had an above normal April since 2012. There were pockets in 13 & 14 but overall was cool for the region.


https://hprcc.unl.edu/maps.php?map=ACISClimateMaps


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top