HC bills require microchips (million, President, Americans, America)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Right after you. At this time, exploring your knowledge on the issue. You pointed at something, I want to see what you know about it and specifically its history.
When, where and why it was implemented has NO BEARING on the principle being argued here.
Now please, any time you feel the need ..make a point.
It's not far fetched at all to believe that implanting of chips is just around the corner.
Tracking chips are already starting to be used in (instead of on) things manufactured, even clothing. So, those of you who are paranoid, save your old clothes. (No, you won't be able to sew your own. All the yard goods will also carry implanted chips.)
It was an idiotic allegation to make in the first place. From out of which cave and hibernation for centuries do people who make such claims crawl from? Thanks.
It is technically feasible and potentially valuable in my mind. Since I don't suffer from paranoia, I wouldn't fear it.
If you look back to my post directed to carterstamp... I simply made a comment stating that....
1 - Devices DO indeed have tracking
and
2 - People are totally justified being skeptical
You're strawmanning now....
You don't have to be the OP to stick with topic at hand. Not doing so is trolling. Having said that, you seem to acknowledge now that the fear mongering projected against Health Care Reform is unwarranted as the issue of such medical devices has and will exist regardless.
You don't have to be the OP to stick with topic at hand. Not doing so is trolling. Having said that, you seem to acknowledge now that the fear mongering projected against Health Care Reform is unwarranted as the issue of such medical devices has and will exist regardless.
Did I get that right?
No, you didn't.
Since you could not glean... I said there is no reason to trivialize others peoples skepticism in regards to trusting government to not abuse the technology at hand.
Since you could not glean... I said there is no reason to trivialize others peoples skepticism in regards to trusting government to not abuse the technology at hand.
That's what I said...
Then help me understand your position (it is why I am trying to find out where you stand, before discussing this any further).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.