Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Great, this is like a get together for the raving loony NWO freaks, Mark of the Beast freaks (they moved on from bar codes), and the Rapture Ready crowd to complain about something that doesn't exist outside their massive delusional paranoia.
It must be a sad life sitting around raving about the next conspiracy or shot to the amygdala people get with each new "plot"...and the ego boost of thinking of oneself as the only intelligent objector in a world of sheeple.
Not to mention the Proctor and Gamble satanic message in their logo crowd.
I could see it in the future. The HHS Health IT organization want to advance healthcare and reduce the paperwork and tracking that needs to be done so that healthcare providers can better serve their patients.
And there are rfid chips used for patient information that has been approved by the FDA for human implants.
HHS Heath IT has even mentioned patient RFID as an option for improving the process.
It's not total fiction here folks. It's just not at the forefront of what the government wants just now.
It's been discussed by the government. Just not implemented.
Here's the HHS Health IT site if you want to do your own reading: HealthIT.hhs.gov: Home
It's like requiring seatbelts. Which we should have opposed because now they don't even let us drive cars!
Or when we made buffalo and endangered species and wouldn't allow them to be hunted. Now no hunting is allowed in the US.
Now please don't disagree with me because if you do I will get mad. If I get mad I will kick my desk. If I kick my desk I will break my toe. If I break my toe it will get infected. If it gets infected the infection will mutate into a deadly virus. The deadly virus will kill everyone on earth.
Surely it is a slippery slope when you disagree with me.
It's like requiring seatbelts. Which we should have opposed because now they don't even let us drive cars!
What does that have to do with anything? Nobody even made that argument during the seat belt law movement. We objected to the mandate of a given choice concerning it to which had no effect on anyone other than the person making the choice. The objection back then was simply that it was yet one more dictation by the state concerning issues where individual liberty should have taken precedence. It is a perfect example of how people keep taking away others rights to choose and the idiocy of society to which the youth grow up ignorant to the loss of their liberties and have no respect for such peoples choices.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy
Or when we made buffalo and endangered species and wouldn't allow them to be hunted. Now no hunting is allowed in the US.
Another extremely stupid example. Endangered species have nothing to do with an individuals choice. How can you even begin to liken the position of government controlled systems of microchip implants to that of restricting the over hunting of a given species is beyond me. We have evidence through history of why such a law may be warranted and reasonable. It is a basic principal of nature management to not exhaust a resource and restricting such while the species replenishes itself is not an infringement on liberty. In fact, it has nothing to do with the individual specifically. You have logical thought process problems here.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.