Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-22-2023, 08:00 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,702 posts, read 18,777,662 times
Reputation: 22545

Advertisements

Totally unconstitutional. But the royalty couldn't care less these days. They will walk over any citizen right they feel like walking over.

 
Old 10-22-2023, 08:27 PM
 
15,407 posts, read 7,468,300 times
Reputation: 19339
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
Totally unconstitutional. But the royalty couldn't care less these days. They will walk over any citizen right they feel like walking over.
What is unconstitutional? The gag order is limited in scope and time, which is perfectly constitutional.
 
Old 10-22-2023, 09:07 PM
 
18,984 posts, read 9,069,613 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
Totally unconstitutional. But the royalty couldn't care less these days. They will walk over any citizen right they feel like walking over.
You guys act like you never heard of a gag order before. Where have you been living all these years? This isn't something new just invented for Trump.
 
Old 10-22-2023, 09:43 PM
 
46,944 posts, read 25,969,275 times
Reputation: 29439
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
What is unconstitutional? The gag order is limited in scope and time, which is perfectly constitutional.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
You guys act like you never heard of a gag order before. Where have you been living all these years? This isn't something new just invented for Trump.
The quote about conservatism being based the law protecting the in-groups and binding the out-groups is turning out to be literal truth.
 
Old 10-23-2023, 03:06 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,366,979 times
Reputation: 12648


"they say the former president appeared to declare"
 
Old 10-23-2023, 03:57 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,187 posts, read 19,179,477 times
Reputation: 14884
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
"they say the former president appeared to declare"
It was interpreted as a threat. He should have made himself clear, or better yet, shut up. That was one instance.
 
Old 10-23-2023, 04:58 AM
 
13,684 posts, read 9,004,356 times
Reputation: 10405
There is some confusion herein about the topic of this thread. Understandable, since Mr. Trump has multiple civil and criminal proceedings against him, in both state and Federal courts.



This thread concerns the ongoing Civil Fraud proceeding in a New York State court.



There was no jury trial concerning whether Mr. Trump and his companies engaged in fraud. The reason is that during his August deposition, Mr. Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination some 450 times.



Now, in criminal matters, pleading the Fifth cannot be used against you. No negative inference may be drawn from pleading the Fifth.



But, this is a civil proceeding. If one pleads the Fifth in a Civil proceeding, then negative inferences may be drawn.



Since it appears that Mr. Trump only answered a few questions regarding his name and where he resided, but pleaded the Fifth to every other question that had any connection with his potential fraudulent business activity, then the presiding Judge was able to grant the State a summary judgment on the issue of whether or not Mr. Trump engaged in civil fraud.



As such, the ongoing trial is only concerned with the civil penalty.



For those that ask "Why wasn't Mr. Trump allowed a jury?", the answer is simple: Mr. Trump opted for a trial by judge.



Mr. Trump is in the position he finds himself solely due to his own acts: pleading the Fifth some 450 times, and opting for a judge to decide punishment rather than a jury.



Obviously, Mr. Trump decided that it was better to risk his business by pleading the Fifth, rather than commit perjury; or, in the alternative, telling the truth and then risk criminal prosecution if he admitted to the fraudulent business behavior.



Like father like son, Eric Trump (a VP) invoked the Fifth Amendment some 500 times. It is unclear if Ivanka and Don Jr. did the same.



If you desire to see the former President of the United States invoking the Fifth Amendment ("like a mobster", he once claimed, decrying those that sought Fifth Amendment protection), google it. There are plenty of videos of the almost six hour long deposition.
 
Old 10-23-2023, 05:10 AM
 
4,834 posts, read 3,262,003 times
Reputation: 9445
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
... Whether he is jailed or not, hard to see how Trump wins this election. He has never won an election before. He lost the first one by 3 million and the second one by 7 million...

Not only has he never won an election, everyone is on high alert this time around. Gerrymandered districts are being redrawn. Election lawsuits are being won. ...

Assuming you know exactly how elections work in this country, one might wonder if you'd post the same thing if your gal had one via the electoral college in 2016. But I bet you wouldn't.
 
Old 10-23-2023, 05:42 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,093,761 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Trump isn't the president. And the MAGAs don't scare me. You guys are so inept you can't even elect a leader. Republicans become a punchline, a laughingstock. The GOP is falling apart as the country watches. And you have Trump to thank.
He is our President. The goal is to wake you up not frighten you. We are inept? We are doctors lawyers, judges and every manner of profession and attitude. We are decent some of us to a fault, we love the United States with all it's terrible flaws and we can spot a lie a mile away.

We are Americans just like you

MAGA 2024
 
Old 10-23-2023, 05:53 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,760 posts, read 8,208,674 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
There is some confusion herein about the topic of this thread. Understandable, since Mr. Trump has multiple civil and criminal proceedings against him, in both state and Federal courts.



This thread concerns the ongoing Civil Fraud proceeding in a New York State court.



There was no jury trial concerning whether Mr. Trump and his companies engaged in fraud. The reason is that during his August deposition, Mr. Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination some 450 times.



Now, in criminal matters, pleading the Fifth cannot be used against you. No negative inference may be drawn from pleading the Fifth.



But, this is a civil proceeding. If one pleads the Fifth in a Civil proceeding, then negative inferences may be drawn.



Since it appears that Mr. Trump only answered a few questions regarding his name and where he resided, but pleaded the Fifth to every other question that had any connection with his potential fraudulent business activity, then the presiding Judge was able to grant the State a summary judgment on the issue of whether or not Mr. Trump engaged in civil fraud.



As such, the ongoing trial is only concerned with the civil penalty.



For those that ask "Why wasn't Mr. Trump allowed a jury?", the answer is simple: Mr. Trump opted for a trial by judge.



Mr. Trump is in the position he finds himself solely due to his own acts: pleading the Fifth some 450 times, and opting for a judge to decide punishment rather than a jury.



Obviously, Mr. Trump decided that it was better to risk his business by pleading the Fifth, rather than commit perjury; or, in the alternative, telling the truth and then risk criminal prosecution if he admitted to the fraudulent business behavior.



Like father like son, Eric Trump (a VP) invoked the Fifth Amendment some 500 times. It is unclear if Ivanka and Don Jr. did the same.



If you desire to see the former President of the United States invoking the Fifth Amendment ("like a mobster", he once claimed, decrying those that sought Fifth Amendment protection), google it. There are plenty of videos of the almost six hour long deposition.
+1 had to spread
Trump once a con man always a con man. He is still looking for money.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/con%20man
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top