Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
again it is not trial no matter how hard you guys try to pretend it is.
It is a hearing to investigate the suitability of an applicant to the SC.
KAVANAUGH is not suitable to fill a seat on the bench, he has a very questionable history that involves bar fighting, gambling debts , accusations of numerous SEX CRIMES, a conspiracy believer, and a completely unsuitable temperament.
Kavanaughs outbursts alone disqualify him.
Quote:
In his 12 years on the court, he apparently resolved the ABA’s concerns about his temperament. Kavanaugh cited the bar association’s new unanimous “well qualified” rating for his nomination to the Supreme Court in his opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday
my point was simple, if this is all you guys have then you may as well just admit she was a very credible witness unlike Kavanough who lost his temper repeatedly and lied numerous times.(demonstrable lies, not implied )
Well, read the quote - it is real estate value to have the extra room addition to rent. She has no access for her paranoia if someone is renting the room. It's a no-brainer.
Well, read the quote - it is real estate value to have the extra room addition to rent. She has no access for her paranoia if someone is renting the room. It's a no-brainer.
If it was added to give separate entry for a rental space, it also calls into question her story that her husband was quibbling with her over it. That didn't make sense anyway given she already told him she was assaulted and could have just explained why she needed it rather than pay someone else a few hundred dollars to tell him.
my point was simple, if this is all you guys have then you may as well just admit she was a very credible witness unlike Kavanough who lost his temper repeatedly and lied numerous times.(demonstrable lies, not implied )
Prove one of these lies for us. You say it’s demonstrable so it should be easy.
She has already proven she isn’t credible. Even her life long best friend won’t back up her story. But hey she has a conga line of LWNJs supporting her, so there’s that.....
I had read another article about this but there was no mention that the committee was following up on it. I am relieved to see Grassley's office is pursuing this. It is the final leg of her claim and if they can knock it out from under her, she has nowhere to go but down.
Originally Posted by Wapasha
Except for Christine Ford not one person she has cited as being there has corroborated her version of events. Everyone one of them, including Kavanugh, has sworn under oath that what Ford said, NEVER happened.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk
Which none were under the penalty of perjury for lying. Mark Judge should have been subpoenaed to appear in front of the Judiciary Committee since he was named in the issue and wrote a book about being a Gen X drunk. How they didn't include it proves how much of a Republican ramrod this has been.
Every single statement given to the Judiciary Committee Investigators was under penalty of felony (5 year sentence for lies) - that was repeated many times during the Hearing AND it's posted on the Senate Judiciary website .... not to mention that I've posted that LINK several times.
Rest assured - the FBI has re-interviewed these people and they gave them a statement - we will find out what it all is when the FBI turns in their report.
About that Report .... via Elizabeth Landers CNN reporter
Guess who does NOT want the FBI Report to be made Public?? Guess who wants it a Secret??
If Kavanaugh were guilty of these accusations he would not have accepted the nomination to serve on the Supreme Court because he would know, without a doubt, that his credibility would be investigated and any past negative events would be brought to light and he'd be expected to prove his innocence.
He would never put himself, his family, and his career in such jeopardy.
If it was added to give separate entry for a rental space, it also calls into question her story that her husband was quibbling with her over it. That didn't make sense anyway given she already told him she was assaulted and could have just explained why she needed it rather than pay someone else a few hundred dollars to tell him.
Exactly! It sounded stupid in the first place.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
