Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Once again, where have I advocated wealth confiscation? Keep up with the discussion.
So again. Please explain how income inequality is good for the economy.
Here you go: since talent and effort and ambition and persistence and all the other determinants of income are not distributed evenly, incomes will vary proportionately. Societies which harness the power of each individual being free to unlock the highest fraction of his or her own potential, primarily for their own benefit, are generally far wealthier top to bottom than more egalitarian societies.
...
This needs to change and some people do not see this as a problem . This right here is why republicans should never have a majority of any every again if they do they will own 60% to 70% of the wealth and US will be a third world country
Unless you are incarcerated, there is nothing stopping you from joining the 1% club.
Here you go: since talent and effort and ambition and persistence and all the other determinants of income are not distributed evenly, incomes will vary proportionately. Societies which harness the power of each individual being free to unlock the highest fraction of his or her own potential, primarily for their own benefit, are generally far wealthier top to bottom than more egalitarian societies.
You are welcome.
So your saying that the current income distribution spread is because of the bold?
I'd beg to differ. I would say that SOME of it is do to that. I would also say that there's many, many factors outside of those that determine someone's income level. I say that being someone who has some advantages in some areas.
I would also say that there are several industries right now that are highly corrupt and have little to do with the bold, and more to do with rigging the system, lobbying, and taking advantage of the market. It has little to do with providing a superior good or service.
I'd also go a little bit further and say that someone's income does not always determine their value to society or "worth" to society.
So, you think there should be a limit on how much and individual is allowed to earn?
The Conservative solution to this:
Make it easier for people to get rich.
The Liberal solution to this:
Make it easier for people to stay poor.
The policies of conservatives is to have students pay their full freight to go to college and they are against government grants and loans. How does that make it easier to get rich?
Children that are successes in school get breakfast. Yet, conservatives have repeatedly fought the school nutrition programs. How does that make it easier to get rich?
Woman do better economically when they don't have children too early. Yet, conservative policies are against contraceptives and birth control. How does that make it easier to get rich?
According to some fascinating economic research, Is Employer-Based Health Insurance A Barrier To Entrepreneurship?, there's an unexpectedly large numbers of Americans becoming entrepreneurs within months of qualifying for Medicare (over and above those you would expect to become entrepreneurs because they were fired, forcibly retired, etc.) The reason: They now have the security of healthcare, so they can take the risk of starting private companies.
Yet, conservative have always been against Medicare and government health care. How does that make it easier to get rich?
What you wrote makes a good slogan that doesn't parallel reality.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.