Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2011, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,312,578 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Social secuity checks will likely not stop, but Obama was right not to sugarcoat the issue and tell Americans that this is the kind of thing that is to a significant degree funded from federal borrowing and that ultimately everything is on the table if this issue isn't resolved.

At any rate, you'd think conservatives around here would be happy about this prospect after all of their talk of the liberal socialist entitlements that are hurting the country. Here's an opportunity to see a significant and drastic spending cut go into effect.
The talk of SS being an entitlement is purely political. We have been paying to SS, in my case, for over 65 years and don't consider it to be an entitlement. You can't reasonably compare SS to any kind of welfare where the recipients don't pay income taxes or any kind of federal tax other than some hidden taxes that we all pay.

i am sure you don't have much of an idea how many votes Obama would lose if he cuts off SS checks for even one month. He meant that as a threat and it backed up on him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2011, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,312,578 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I'm still waiting to hear him say the welfare checks won't go out on 8/3.
People contributed to SS yet that was the only payment Obama mentioned.
Very well stated. I wonder how many of our libs even understand what you said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 11:03 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,157 posts, read 44,953,235 times
Reputation: 13739
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I'm still waiting to hear him say the welfare checks won't go out on 8/3.
Me, too.
Quote:
People contributed to SS yet that was the only payment Obama mentioned.
America's senior citizens won't get the retirement income they paid for for decades, but freebie entitlements to the dependent class will continue as scheduled.

The lesson Obama is giving ALL is...
Contribute, and you're screwed.
Contribute nothing, and you're golden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,848,202 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Social secuity checks will likely not stop, but Obama was right not to sugarcoat the issue and tell Americans that this is the kind of thing that is to a significant degree funded from federal borrowing and that ultimately everything is on the table if this issue isn't resolved.

At any rate, you'd think conservatives around here would be happy about this prospect after all of their talk of the liberal socialist entitlements that are hurting the country. Here's an opportunity to see a significant and drastic spending cut go into effect.
What I'm seeing in this thread is that the CD pundits wanted Obama to either A. not mention the consequences or B. lie about it. Since C. he did neither, they explain that he did this to scare people. I guess when the President tells you bad stuff he's bad, and when he tells you nothing or lies about it, he's also bad. Poor guy, he just can't win.

I dunno about you, but not having any money coming in scares the hell out of me. Yes, there might be money to pay it. Will there be someone to make sure it gets paid?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 11:21 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,157 posts, read 44,953,235 times
Reputation: 13739
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post
What I'm seeing in this thread is that the CD pundits wanted Obama to either A. not mention the consequences or B. lie about it.
You completely missed the issue. The problem is the demographic Obama threatened. Where did Obama state the consequences for the welfare-dependent class? Why consequences for those who have already paid, but no consequences for those who pay nothing and only take?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 11:28 AM
 
2,794 posts, read 4,160,387 times
Reputation: 1563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
It'd be a shame if family had to care for our old folks, wouldn't it?
If it were possible, we would. Grandma needs round-the -clock care, & MIL works to support herself, & My husband works to support us & our 3 children. I don't work as my youngest child has cerebral palsy, & I must care for him. I know several families this will affect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,846,981 times
Reputation: 24863
He should delay the checks for a week and blame the Responsible Republicans holding up the debt celing increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,312,578 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
He should delay the checks for a week and blame the Responsible Republicans holding up the debt celing increase.
Let me say that what you propose may have worked but as of now he has been more than exposed. Only he can hold up those checks and what you suggest tells anyone, with some thinking capacity, that he is using politics in an attempt to push the Republicans on the debt ceiling issue. Holding those checks back would prove it and using old people as a weapon against the other party proves what he is trying to do.

Those checks must go out on time and only Obama can stop them from doing so. You do know that don't you? Here is a chance for you to see that when the Treasury Department is asked questions by Republicans they answer with pure bureaucratic gobbledy ****.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,583,836 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
He should delay the checks for a week and blame the Responsible Republicans holding up the debt celing increase.
So dirty politics when done by the Dems is not so dirty huh ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,312,578 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
This thread is filled with inaccuracies - nothing new for this forum. And although I'm retired and have the time to provide more accurate information, I'd rather work in the yard.

But, let me answer this whopper:



Fact Checker: $500 Billion Cut From Medicare?

I read your link and found it to sound very much like an editorial column by the way it was worded. Just putting Fact Checker in the title of an article doesn't make it real.

How about you telling me where the $50 billion a year from Medicare comes from. I aid $50 billion because I am so tired of the Obamas talking about everything in 10 year increments. I guess if they will still be around in 10 years that is ok but I doubt that many of them will be. For example, everything they talk about concerning the debt ceiling thing turns out in 10 year increments. They try to make their amounts of money for cuts sound very large by saying we will cut this by $200 billion but it turns out they mean for 10 years. I don't think $20 billion a year will make much of a dent in the debt, but maybe you really eat all that up.

You did find one very true statement to quote. The one that says they will be taking money from the providers and not the people getting help. Of course, I can prove that by looking at what Medicare paid for my last endoscopy. Obamacare was barely in effect when my surgeon turned in his bill for the same amount as he has been getting every year for 10 years, about 60% of what he asked for. This last time he was cut about 15%. That makes me think that my state medicare board is really a death squad since prices don't go down over 10 years except on cars and the like.

Maybe you best get out in the yard since your link wasn't at all what you purported it to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top