Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-07-2011, 04:25 AM
 
20,385 posts, read 20,009,954 times
Reputation: 13497

Advertisements

Permanent jury duty?

Talk about a serious violation of the 8th Ammendment.

Hey, it's NY. PC trumps common sense any day of the week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2011, 06:02 AM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,151,838 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdm2008 View Post
I think its pretty clear she was trying to get out jury duty by being disqualified. This is the oldest trick in the book. Obviously she should have been more subtle about it.
Next time, tell them you're a lawyer.

Automatic boot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 06:03 AM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,151,838 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerseyt719 View Post
Since when does one get "sentenced" for answering a question?
Perjury?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 06:08 AM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,383,547 times
Reputation: 12713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
Perjury?
How would you prove it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 06:13 AM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,151,838 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post
How would you prove it?
I don't know.

I was just answering the question. Perjury IS a way that you can be "sentenced" for answering a question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 06:32 AM
 
30,202 posts, read 18,779,505 times
Reputation: 21049
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
Uh, how many people here think she was deliberately trying to get out of being a juror in a mob trial?

Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 06:37 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,819 posts, read 41,126,784 times
Reputation: 62280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
How could you be a unbiased juror if you are overtly and openly racist?

My company pays me my hourly rate for all jury duty, so I'd welcome that.
I think she heard it was the easiest way to get out of doing jury duty and trying to get out of jury duty in a mob trial doesn't seem so heinous if she was scared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 08:05 AM
 
2,112 posts, read 2,703,086 times
Reputation: 1774
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogdad View Post
Well we can see why this Judge made this stupid decision.


"Recently Judge Garaufis presided over the NYC Firefighters Hiring Case. He ruled "that out of every five entry-level hires, the Fire Department must agree to reserve two hires for black priority applicants and one for a Hispanic priority applicant until 293 qualifying minority candidates have been offered a position." This ruling is intended to "compensate minority applicants who took discriminatory entrance exams, which were used from 1999 to 2002."

Nicholas Garaufis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sounds like this judge is rather racist himself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 08:12 AM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,357,558 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy_Jole View Post
Sounds like this judge is rather racist himself.
State sponsored racism.

He's one statist mofo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 09:06 AM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,406,704 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
This, high anus crime!
Well, two yutes, judges have a lot of discretion to punish somebody for what they perceive to be misstatements or lies made while in voir dire or on the questionnaire.

Quote:
I think she heard it was the easiest way to get out of doing jury duty and trying to get out of jury duty in a mob trial doesn't seem so heinous if she was scared.
I'm not exactly sure how it works in the EDNY criminal court, but in many, many places, prospective jurors fill out the questionnaire before they're brought into the courtroom or find out which case they might be put on. If that's the case, she wasn't trying to get out of a mob trial, she was just trying to get out of a trial. Either way, jurors are or should be told explicitly that lying on the questionnaire is a crime and obstructs justice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top