Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2012, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,508,031 times
Reputation: 25771

Advertisements

Sounds like the judge is an idiot that gets off on the power he has. "You will respect my o'thorty". Being a judge is no proof that someone is smart.

It's kind of ironic that this country has legal protections for those accused of crimes, including right to a jury trial, to face your accused, protections from cruel and unusual punishment. Yet if you offend a judge he can make your life hell for simply having a different opinion.

Look at it objectively...should a person that has personal biases against the race of those accused of a crime be serving on a jury in a case against people of those races?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-01-2012, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maabus1999 View Post
She won't get far as it is a constitutional requirement in the U.S. Constitution. Really the only requirement to being a U.S. citizen. If a Judge wants to keep her on Juror Duty status, he can and there really isn't much she can do about it. I believe for the current standard you can be on call for a month or more, and he can just call her in every day if he chooses.
The Sixth Ammendment states "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law..."

Nowhere in this ammendment nor anywhere in the Constitution will one find language that defines the manner in which the impartial jury shall be empaneled.

The judge violated the 13th Ammendment by requiring her to remain indefinitely on jury duty - and it could alos be argued that the requirement that she show up at the courthouse against her will to serve on a jury is a violation of the 13th ammendment:

- Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude;except as a punishment for crime wherof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Jury duty should be a voluntary employment like all other tasks that are performed in the government system, and the jurors should be paid at the very least a minimum wage and not the ridiculous stipends they receive now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 02:34 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,198,564 times
Reputation: 5240
people have to remember that jury duty is not a bad thing. they have to not only go into a jury box to determine the guilt or innocence of the ddefendent, but also judge the constitutionality of the law that the defendent is being prosecuted on.

jury nullification is a good thing, not a bad one.

I have been on 2 federal juries in the 90's. it was great doing a jury nullification on weapons charges when the goverment has no authority to do so in the 1st place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
people have to remember that jury duty is not a bad thing. they have to not only go into a jury box to determine the guilt or innocence of the ddefendent, but also judge the constitutionality of the law that the defendent is being prosecuted on.

jury nullification is a good thing, not a bad one.
Fully Informed Jury Association
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 02:37 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,198,564 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post

already belong to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 11:39 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
already belong to it.
Good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2012, 06:05 AM
 
73,012 posts, read 62,607,656 times
Reputation: 21931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maabus1999 View Post
You can be on Jury Duty and be called in every day yet never actually be on an actual Jury deciding a verdict.
I have never served in jury duty, so I wouldn't know. Ironically, I've voted in every presidential and governor election since 2004.

My point being, if there is a racist person on jury duty, who is to say that person won't be on the jury making a verdict? That is a risk that scares me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top