Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2010, 04:34 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
1,758 posts, read 4,234,508 times
Reputation: 552

Advertisements

We have discussed enough on these pages how the North shore Conector is a "waste of money' or a "sweetheart deal" or that it "makes no sense."
It is hard to to deny any of these arguments, but since it will be up and running in about twenty months, let's look at the positives that it might bring since you cannot do anything about the fact that it is here for the long term.
This will allow people that are staying in Downtown hotels to have quick access to North Shore attractions like the stadiums, the Carnegie Science Center and the Rivers Casino. It will also allow for much quicker access from Station Square to the North Shore. This will help CCAC and the nearby neighborhood of Allegheny West in it's quest to expand .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2010, 05:08 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,420 posts, read 4,715,201 times
Reputation: 1212
I just read somewhere that the Clemente bridge was built with supports that have an arch at the bottom to accommodate a future subway tunnel under the river. So, they finally get around to doing it and it doesn't even go under the Clemente bridge!

As for something positive: even though the money could have been spent on something more needed, like even an extension to the Strip, it's not like nobody's going to use it when it gets finished. Never underestimate the laziness of the general public and look for more business on the North Shore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2010, 06:05 PM
 
1,164 posts, read 2,060,868 times
Reputation: 819
Quote:
Originally Posted by creepsinc View Post
I just read somewhere that the Clemente bridge was built with supports that have an arch at the bottom to accommodate a future subway tunnel under the river. So, they finally get around to doing it and it doesn't even go under the Clemente bridge!
The Sixth, Seventh and Ninth Street Bridges are identical. All three originally carried trolleys, but the trolleys were converted to additional lanes for traffic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2010, 06:16 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,420 posts, read 4,715,201 times
Reputation: 1212
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyev View Post
The Sixth, Seventh and Ninth Street Bridges are identical. All three originally carried trolleys, but the trolleys were converted to additional lanes for traffic.

That's all true, but what I read involved the arches at the base of the supports underwater, for a future underwater tunnel. Actually, underwater and underground.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberto_Clemente_Bridge

"The Sixth Street Bridge's piers were built with arched openings beneath the river bed in order to accommodate future subway tunnels, following the recommendation of transportation planner Bion J. Arnold.[1] The North Shore Connector tunnels under construction in 2009 did not make use of this provision, but were bored further west (downstream) and do not pass beneath the bridge."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2010, 07:13 PM
 
1,164 posts, read 2,060,868 times
Reputation: 819
Quote:
Originally Posted by creepsinc View Post
That's all true, but what I read involved the arches at the base of the supports underwater, for a future underwater tunnel. Actually, underwater and underground.


Roberto Clemente Bridge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Sixth Street Bridge's piers were built with arched openings beneath the river bed in order to accommodate future subway tunnels, following the recommendation of transportation planner Bion J. Arnold.[1] The North Shore Connector tunnels under construction in 2009 did not make use of this provision, but were bored further west (downstream) and do not pass beneath the bridge."
Cool. The tunnel is shown in one of the engineering drawings as "proposed subway tunnel." It's not even mentioned in the NRHP narrative for the bridge. I wonder if the Seventh and Ninth Street Bridges also have one...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2010, 08:36 PM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,038,829 times
Reputation: 2911
I definitely think it will help contract the "mental map" space between Downtown and the North Shore, particularly for visitors.

It should allow for more of the North Shore to be used for everyday activities, and less to be reserved for gameday parking.

These are not small things in my view.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2010, 05:21 AM
 
296 posts, read 561,395 times
Reputation: 126
The viaduct between Heinz Field and the parking garage should make Pittsburgh and its transportation infrastructure look 'modern' to outsiders visiting the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2010, 06:26 AM
 
Location: pittsburgh
911 posts, read 2,376,663 times
Reputation: 411
kinda neat that they planned for a tunnel under the river when they built the bridge in 1928
now thats pre-palnning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2010, 07:10 AM
 
346 posts, read 537,624 times
Reputation: 205
I think this will be awesome when completed... I just wish it was around when I was at CCAC. I think this will really bring more people into town and the North Shore who live along the T-line. I think families will be more inclined to go to Pirates game and visit the Science Center knowing Parking is not an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2010, 07:16 AM
 
Location: About 10 miles north of Pittsburgh International
2,458 posts, read 4,207,060 times
Reputation: 2374
It's silly to fault today's planners for not using something that was pre-planned prior to 1928. Today's city, and what makes sense for it, are not necessarily at all similar to anything that might reasonably have been anticipated at that time. (It certainly would've been interesting to see how differently things might have evolved had that pre-planned subway been built though.)

Hopefully, in a hundred years our heirs will be praising the visionaries that pushed for the existing tunnel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top