Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-27-2020, 11:51 AM
 
1,899 posts, read 1,403,924 times
Reputation: 2303

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by id77 View Post
The listings I've been watching suggest Boston (Allston to Beacon Hill and points in-between) and northern Brookline have at least momentarily flattened on their upward price trajectories. Basically, places where single-family homes are few and yards are small.
Interesting. That really hasn’t happened on the other side of the river. The only places that have somewhat slowed in Cambridge are some 1BR and studios. Everything else is still going bananas. It’s hard to figure. I still believe the rental market is going to drag real estate in the urban core down at some point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2020, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Boston
2,435 posts, read 1,321,214 times
Reputation: 2126
Quote:
Originally Posted by porterhouse View Post
Interesting. That really hasn’t happened on the other side of the river. The only places that have somewhat slowed in Cambridge are some 1BR and studios. Everything else is still going bananas. It’s hard to figure. I still believe the rental market is going to drag real estate in the urban core down at some point.
It's Redfin, but FWIW:

https://www.redfin.com/zipcode/02116/housing-market

The market's having a flattening for about a year, but you can bet in 5-7 years that average sales price will be close to $2 million and price per square foot another $100-200 higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 12:23 PM
 
3,176 posts, read 3,697,239 times
Reputation: 2676
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutdoorLover View Post
There's a lot of discussion on people moving out to the boondocks to escape Covid-19 and take advantage of current remote working practices. I don't know how many people are actually doing that. I believe it's a thing, but I suspect it's a distinct minority of people. And I agree that it's a risk. Clearly some companies are adapting, and for at least some of their workforce, indefinitely. But I don't think this is most roles in most businesses. I imagine that the *need* to work remotely for health reasons will be pretty much gone by the end of next year. Then you'll have a surplus of people wanting remote work, and a relative shortage of positions to suit them. You could of course move back again, but 2 house sales in 2 years will cause a pretty big financial hit.
A lot of companies are souring on paying for office space that's been mostly vacant for 8 months and will likely lay vacant at least another 6 or 7 months. I do think a lot of jobs will be in person again in 2022, but I don't think they'll be in person 5 days a week. If someone has to drive into the office 2 days a week, they'll be willing to drive much further than if they had to do it 5 days a week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Boston
2,435 posts, read 1,321,214 times
Reputation: 2126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dm84 View Post
A lot of companies are souring on paying for office space that's been mostly vacant for 8 months and will likely lay vacant at least another 6 or 7 months. I do think a lot of jobs will be in person again in 2022, but I don't think they'll be in person 5 days a week. If someone has to drive into the office 2 days a week, they'll be willing to drive much further than if they had to do it 5 days a week.
I still don't see why someone would do such a long commute even 2 days a week if they didn't have to. What's gained from having a home with a 90-minute commute as opposed to a home with a 30-minute one? A home close to entertainment and shopping as opposed to a home that's not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 01:07 PM
 
16,396 posts, read 8,198,277 times
Reputation: 11378
Default re

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dm84 View Post
A lot of companies are souring on paying for office space that's been mostly vacant for 8 months and will likely lay vacant at least another 6 or 7 months. I do think a lot of jobs will be in person again in 2022, but I don't think they'll be in person 5 days a week. If someone has to drive into the office 2 days a week, they'll be willing to drive much further than if they had to do it 5 days a week.
Yes. My dept has been floating around not returning to the office. So perhaps I'm wrong and that many other depts have discussed the same thing. My point is that if someone is 34 working at a place like liberty mutual and they can currently work from home so they moved far away from Boston....is their plan to be working at liberty mutual remote until they retire? People change jobs frequently these days. Things happen with jobs, layoffs are a possibility. I would not take the risk of moving to VT and just assume that i'll be at my current job forever and assume the next job I find would be fully remote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 03:28 PM
 
15,796 posts, read 20,504,199 times
Reputation: 20974
Quote:
Originally Posted by id77 View Post
I still don't see why someone would do such a long commute even 2 days a week if they didn't have to. What's gained from having a home with a 90-minute commute as opposed to a home with a 30-minute one? A home close to entertainment and shopping as opposed to a home that's not?

I would gladly take a longer commute 2x per week to get more for my $$. More land, more SF, more space to do as I please. More trees. We don’t need entertainment, 99% of our shopping is done online.


Most of my social circle has done, or is doing the same thing. I don’t know anyone moving closer to Boston. Seems everyone I know is taking their profits on their inflated 128 belt house and moving to 495 or beyond.

I’ve been in my neighborhood 5 years and houses are selling for $200-250k more than what we paid. Our household income is higher as well. Time to take the profits and get closer to what we want.

Last edited by BostonMike7; 11-27-2020 at 03:39 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Boston
2,435 posts, read 1,321,214 times
Reputation: 2126
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonMike7 View Post
I would gladly take a longer commute 2x per week to get more for my $$. More land, more SF, more space to do as I please. More trees. We don’t need entertainment, 99% of our shopping is done online.


Most of my social circle has done, or is doing the same thing. I don’t know anyone moving closer to Boston. Seems everyone I know is taking their profits on their inflated 128 belt house and moving to 495 or beyond.

I’ve been in my neighborhood 5 years and houses are selling for $200-250k more than what we paid. Our household income is higher as well. Time to take the profits and get closer to what we want.
You're getting more square footage and more land that's worth less per unit than those inner suburbs, which is exactly why you're able to get more of it. You can buy 4,000 square feet in an Acton for less than 1,000 in Brookline only because a lot more people want that spot in Brookline than there are people wanting that spot in Acton (to be clear, this isn't to say nobody wants to live in Acton).

You also won't see the same long-term pace of appreciation out past 495. If it's your forever home, it's all fine and a moot point as long as you're happy. I think for a younger couple or single person who's just got the newfound freedom of WFH (if only temporarily) though, it's not a smart move to abandon a market that's on a long-term trajectory into the stratosphere, and with many more convenient employment choices, in exchange for more of something less valuable and convenient, unless they're just renting since rents gonna jump regardless of what they do. Buying-wise though, what's happening in Boston and its nearest, densest neighbors right now is the same as what happened to the stock market in late March, so those who are wise to it will catch the correction while they can; another chance might not come along for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Western MA
2,556 posts, read 2,284,398 times
Reputation: 6882
Quote:
Originally Posted by in_newengland View Post
My friend in Easthampton just got out of quarantine. Said she attended a small birthday party in someone's house and everyone else is sick with COVID. She said it's running rampant around there. I thought the colleges in the area had gone remote but maybe they didn't. Other than restaurants, I don't know what could have caused the spike around there.
I don't know, but the few times I've driven through downtown Northampton recently, the streets were hopping with pedestrians. All of the restaurant outdoor seating are filled and the stores look to be open. I'm sure people are taking precautions, but perhaps not enough.

Since there are noticeably many people out & about, I wouldn't be surprised to hear that there are social gatherings happening in homes. I don't know for a fact that this is the case, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:59 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,259,472 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by id77 View Post
I also never really understood this exodus. For people financially pinched a bit with living downtown, moving out a few miles made sense. People taking off for a middle-of-nowhere VT home on the hopes that they won't be commuting back to Boston in two years is rolling some really big (and loaded) dice. People who work in Boston (even if WFH right now) and are moving past 128 and especially 495 are insane. They're trading good location for poor location, good amenities for poor amenities, and decent commute for terrible commute...and for what?

Even though I WFH, I would want to stay as close to the city as I could manage. If anything, this is an opportunity for those younger people to get in to a closer suburb or even inner Boston by taking advantage of the housing market's flattening rather than fleeing and dealing with selling with a rural market when they're reeled back in kicking and screaming.
I telecommuted from my condo at a Vermont ski resort for 10 winters. Most people I had to interact with from my company were Mountain time, Pacific time, or in Asia. I could do an hour of email, boot up in the condo, and be on the hill for first chair most mornings. Nothing was usually on my calendar before 11:00. With high speed lifts, I could get a bunch of runs in.

In the summer, I was telecommuting from my summer place. I was usually out doing boat, beach, or bicycle by 4:30. I often had Asia calls in the evening so I had a god four hour window to live my summer life.

That’s always been my weekend lifestyle. I didn’t have kids in a school system so I could structure things that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2020, 07:10 AM
 
16,396 posts, read 8,198,277 times
Reputation: 11378
Default re

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
I telecommuted from my condo at a Vermont ski resort for 10 winters. Most people I had to interact with from my company were Mountain time, Pacific time, or in Asia. I could do an hour of email, boot up in the condo, and be on the hill for first chair most mornings. Nothing was usually on my calendar before 11:00. With high speed lifts, I could get a bunch of runs in.

In the summer, I was telecommuting from my summer place. I was usually out doing boat, beach, or bicycle by 4:30. I often had Asia calls in the evening so I had a god four hour window to live my summer life.

That’s always been my weekend lifestyle. I didn’t have kids in a school system so I could structure things that way.
I think the whole point here is that if someone moves to VT now and their company wants them back in the Boston office they are going to be inconvenienced. Sure, it's possible to be remote in VT and have calls with people throughout the world...but if management wants butts in seats again it doesn't matter how easy it was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top