Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He's attacked Hillary and Fiorina on looks alone, made a gaff with male genitalia on Hillary and what about the Megyn Kelly incident? Isn't it conventional wisdom that when it comes in three, it's worthy of a trend?
Big deal. That hypocrite Fioina went after her opponents looks. At least Trump clarified his dumb insult. AND that is no proof he hates women. How absurd.
Here is a quote from the disgraceful article YOU linked too. "When he called all Mexicans rapists, thugs and murders" He never said that. He said the Mexican government was sending them over. Anything else is dishonest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk
A number is personality but personality influences policy. Also you put the foreign policy, gun rights, property rights, abortion rights, deportation plan cost and tax plan criticisms in with "personality."
No you don't. Only someone who follows tabloids and/or is uninformed does. It's always about policy.
Last edited by Loveshiscountry; 01-03-2016 at 01:29 PM..
5. He wants to spend a minimum of $140 billion deporting everyone here illegally regardless of how it would force law enforcement to stereotype and violate the 4th amendment rights of legal immigrants while taking resources away from fighting violent crime, drugs, and our enemies
Source: Donald Trump's deportation plan would cost $100-200 billion | MSNBC
He has supported some horrible policies like bailouts, single payer, eminent domain, continued involvement in the Middle East and I wont support Trump ever. But you made things up in your first post and are repeating them again. As well as using the tabloid garbage on things that have nothing to do about policy. You found some articles but never did anything more than scratch the surface.
You falsely play the race card. That is repulsive tabloid garbage.
Who cares if Putin and Duke said something positive about him? Like I said and you proved yet again, you're into the tabloids. It's always about policy.
He's the establishment but doesn't come close to making Sanders look like a moderate.
He doesn't want to track Muslims. That was made up but understandable because he isn't clear on his stance.
Endorsed direct talks with our enemies such as Iran and Russia? Why yes lets stop talking with them because that's how things get done right?
We haven't had free trade we have had managed trade. Trump hasn't been clear on what he exactly thinks free trade is.
He is hard to understand with his "we need to do something" statements.
The fascinating things that I've noticed about those who don't support Trump is this.
They endlessly post in topics about Trump.
They are loath to admit to who they support instead.
They never start topics on why their candidate is leading, why people will be voting to this candidate, why their candidate will win.
That is because I haven't decided yet who I am going to support, I have several candidates I am considering. It is still early in the election cycle and this is normal. I doubt I am alone. I have, however, decided with unshakable certainty that I will not vote for Trump.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
the media likes saying Christie is a thinking mans Trump
I'd like to know who said that. I've never heard it before.
Christie is a big-government Republican who strongly supports government surveillance of private citizens. That, alone, is enough to turn me off. Both he and John Kasich are closer to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in their governing philosophies than they are to people like Rand Paul or Donald Trump.
Big deal. That hypocrite Fioina went after her opponents looks. At least Trump clarified his dumb insult. AND that is no proof he hates women. How absurd.
Here is a quote from the disgraceful article YOU linked too. "When he called all Mexicans rapists, thugs and murders" He never said that. He said the Mexican government was sending them over. Anything else is dishonest.
No you don't. Only someone who follows tabloids and/or is uninformed does. It's always about policy.
Tell me how is tax plans, gun rights, women's rights, healthcare, etc. are simply personality? What I don't like about him personally also can lead to bad policy. He is far too brash to be President. Imagine him dealing Putin and starting to throw insults at him. America has proven time and time again, NOBODY LIKES A PRESIDENT WHO WILL GO NUCLEAR. Didn't work with Goldwater.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry
He has supported some horrible policies like bailouts, single payer, eminent domain, continued involvement in the Middle East and I wont support Trump ever. But you made things up in your first post and are repeating them again. As well as using the tabloid garbage on things that have nothing to do about policy. You found some articles but never did anything more than scratch the surface.
You falsely play the race card. That is repulsive tabloid garbage.
Who cares if Putin and Duke said something positive about him? Like I said and you proved yet again, you're into the tabloids. It's always about policy.
He's the establishment but doesn't come close to making Sanders look like a moderate.
He doesn't want to track Muslims. That was made up but understandable because he isn't clear on his stance.
Endorsed direct talks with our enemies such as Iran and Russia? Why yes lets stop talking with them because that's how things get done right?
We haven't had free trade we have had managed trade. Trump hasn't been clear on what he exactly thinks free trade is.
He is hard to understand with his "we need to do something" statements.
Trump panders to the tabloids and news networks rather than actually do real stump speeches on policy, it's all rhetoric.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale
I'd like to know who said that. I've never heard it before.
Christie is a big-government Republican who strongly supports government surveillance of private citizens. That, alone, is enough to turn me off. Both he and John Kasich are closer to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in their governing philosophies than they are to people like Rand Paul or Donald Trump.
Trump isn't close to Rand at all. Trump is just looked at for immigration and anti-PC rhetoric. Nothing on actual meat and potatoes policy, just the sizzle on the steak.
I like Donald. I have learned a lot from him...books, on his Apprentice show... but, I stop with the Republicans period...because I want more background checks
at the Gunshows.
I want mentally ill and others involved with Jihad, Isis and all to not be able to get these
AK type semi automatic weapons...they are not shooting deer and elk and
antelope with them.
I'm in CO and own plenty of guns...so many I sold a couple.
I don't want nuts to have them.
He will veto any gun control that could get through with Obama.
I have guns...I want better background checks, period.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
