Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Exactly! Can you imagine how many pages of whining we'd have to read by the uproar that would be caused in reaction to people talking that same amount of crap about Philly here?? You make an excellent point here, and thank you for pointing this out.
Still no acknowledgement that San Francisco metro should clealry be 7.5 million? Does that satellite image not clarify it?
Its absurd to say San Francisco and San Jose are not part of the same metro area: they are separated by 50 miles of unfettered urban development, they are connected by the Caltrain commuter rail, they share media, etc...
Yeah the trolling is really lame and is just furthering the agenda of the OP. It would be nice if the rest of those posting in this thread would learn to differentiate between that one obvious troll and the rest of us though.
I thought the "T" word was not tolerated...funny how some posters get away with it?
Your constant referencing of this praise just makes it more and more obvious that you only did that to fit your agenda. If you're so in favor of tact and a lack of innuendos then maybe you should ATTEMPT to apply either one. Again, you are the only one making innuendos here, and your tact has been terrible. Your compliments were a complete farce, and those you took offense to said what they said outright. Who else made any innuendos, aside from you?
But the point is, as already stated, the SF/Oakland/SJ bay area (population: 7.5 million) functions like any other MSA in the country. It is a continuous urban stretch that clearly feels like its part of the same urban area. The satellite image clarifies that.
The only reason the Govt. doesnt technically classify the whole Bay Area as an MSA is because San Jose itself is a huge employment epicenter...its a techincal separation and a foolish one. For the purposes of this comparison you should look at the entire continuous-urban bay area, not some arbitrary MSA determination.
Some pics of the lowly San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA MSA
No, this image is not doctored
Who says it's lowly...noone but you guys...I love San Francisco...said so many times...Stunning pictures...thanx...but some posters seem kinda like "Sybil"...Scary! Funny..Philly's pics got the axe?
From personal experience, I found Philly to be an extremely racist, culturally backward, third rate city. As a minority, the racism and attitudes of the people from Philly were completely unbearable and I had to get the hell out of there.
This thread is merely a reflection.
You need to look in a mirror...if it does not shatter
we are telling you as residents of the area that everybody here recognizes the San Francisco bay area as the area around the san francisco bay
derrrr
hence the name itself san francisco bay
and what cities surround the san francisco bay
SF + the peninsula, oakland and the east bay (note the word bay in "east bay"), San Jose and the south bay, and vallejo and the cities to the north.
here is one of YOUR posts
as one poster told you (who you purposely ignored), click on #13 on that page
and if you're still lazy and want to pretend that link doesn't exist, here is the page
All from a link YOU posted. read the stuff inside the red box, and look at the image to the left.
Don't call me lazy.....Grow up...I read it and it is irrelevant to my thread. Thank god I live away from
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.