Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: In your eyes, which city has the most powerful, breaktaking skyline?
Chicago 111 23.92%
New York City 188 40.52%
Boston 6 1.29%
Atlanta 16 3.45%
Dallas 12 2.59%
Houston 23 4.96%
Los Angeles 12 2.59%
Seattle 26 5.60%
San Francisco 9 1.94%
Minneapolis 10 2.16%
Cleveland 4 0.86%
Pittsburgh 24 5.17%
Philadelphia 6 1.29%
Miami 9 1.94%
Denver 8 1.72%
Voters: 464. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-10-2009, 10:23 AM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,780,711 times
Reputation: 1681

Advertisements

Seriously how could it not beat LA? Idk about Philly though thats a tough call there both great

Pittsburgh for January 2009 - SkyscraperPage Forum












 
Old 01-10-2009, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,791,291 times
Reputation: 10454
The first photo was all that was needed Bill; it said it all.
 
Old 01-10-2009, 12:39 PM
 
Location: New England
8,155 posts, read 21,034,298 times
Reputation: 3338
Without reading all 20 pages...after the first few I see everyone talking about which one was more pretty.

Well, the poll asks which is the MOST POWERFUL - not the most beautiful.

NYC by a landslide.

As for the beauty thing...the problem with NYC is, it's just so big each building loses it's identity where a smaller city you can focus on 4-5 buildings.

If you take the time to look at each building individually while walking down say 42nd street, you will see incredible beauty in the buildings from modern art deco to late 19th century victorian. Some of the newer stuff in Mid-town is outstanding.
 
Old 01-10-2009, 02:07 PM
 
464 posts, read 1,080,822 times
Reputation: 126
The list are roughly the same size. MAYBE NYC has one-three more planned buildings. And that's taking into consideration that they are all built.
 
Old 01-10-2009, 02:12 PM
 
464 posts, read 1,080,822 times
Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by s63 View Post
Actually, the Freedom Tower will be taller than the Sears Tower, because the last time I checked, the spire is very much part of the tower.

Oh, and the Freedom Tower is under construction, already financed and will be completed while the Spire more than likely won't so I don't see how the dead...oops, I mean "delayed" Chicago Spire can pass the Freedom Tower.

And let me just throw this in for good measure,

Skyscrapers built:

Chicago
Built: 1075
Under Construction: 62

New York
Built: 6054
Under Construction: 154
No..The roof of the sears tower is higher than the roof of the Freedom Tower...there is just a huge spire on top making it the tallest building in the country in pinnacle height. Not From Ground to its roof.

And about the Spire, it will most definitely be built sometime within the next 2-3 years. Believe me though, if the Freedom Tower wasn't going to be where the twin towers once stood, it would have been canceled a while ago.
 
Old 01-10-2009, 03:02 PM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,780,711 times
Reputation: 1681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
No..The roof of the sears tower is higher than the roof of the Freedom Tower...there is just a huge spire on top making it the tallest building in the country in pinnacle height. Not From Ground to its roof.
What Sears has is an antenna. Antennas do not count into what a tower's official height is as they are not part of its design; not put there for aesthetics. What 1 WTC will have is a spire, which is part of a tower's official height because it is apart of the design of the building. 1 WTC actually has both an antenna and Spire. Btw these are just the rules i don't make them up nor do i necessarily agree with them

Quote:
And about the Spire, it will most definitely be built sometime within the next 2-3 years. Believe me though, if the Freedom Tower wasn't going to be where the twin towers once stood, it would have been canceled a while ago.
How can you be so sure for one? And Number two, i highly disagree. I think 1 WTC, if it were not filling in that site, would have been built a long time ago. Like A LONG time ago because many, many reasons.
 
Old 01-10-2009, 05:32 PM
 
464 posts, read 1,080,822 times
Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billiam View Post
What Sears has is an antenna. Antennas do not count into what a tower's official height is as they are not part of its design; not put there for aesthetics. What 1 WTC will have is a spire, which is part of a tower's official height because it is apart of the design of the building. 1 WTC actually has both an antenna and Spire. Btw these are just the rules i don't make them up nor do i necessarily agree with them



How can you be so sure for one? And Number two, i highly disagree. I think 1 WTC, if it were not filling in that site, would have been built a long time ago. Like A LONG time ago because many, many reasons.
Are you saying that if 9/11 never happened they would be building the Freedom Tower @ the WTC plaza...I'm saying that if The Freedom Tower had been just another project, it would haven't been built.
 
Old 01-10-2009, 05:35 PM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,780,711 times
Reputation: 1681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
Are you saying that if 9/11 never happened they would be building the Freedom Tower @ the WTC plaza...I'm saying that if The Freedom Tower had been just another project, it would haven't been built.
no that is what im saying. If it was at a different site, just another project, it would have been built a while ago
 
Old 01-10-2009, 07:39 PM
 
1,107 posts, read 3,025,334 times
Reputation: 479
anyway though the greatest building out of all of those is the Tour de Verre
 
Old 01-10-2009, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,791,291 times
Reputation: 10454
Hmmm, obvious Hancock influence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top