Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-22-2012, 11:41 PM
 
Location: NYC/LA
484 posts, read 871,722 times
Reputation: 477

Advertisements

You D.C. folks need to get a grip...D.C. is not even on the same level as LA. LA is more dense and more urban. LA is just a much bigger city, in feel, in looks, in reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:03 AM
 
Location: Nob Hill, San Francisco, CA
2,342 posts, read 3,990,299 times
Reputation: 1088
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8loody View Post
L.A

• City 3,792,621
Area 502.693 sq mi

Chicago

• City 2,707,120
Area 234.0 sq mi

People brag about how huge L.A is but if you look at the city boundaries population and total area of the city, L.A isn't so big anymore. L.A without its suburbs is nothing.
LOL almost forgot about this guy when it turned into a DC vs San Francisco thing, he tried to sneak his incorrect condescending insults in thinking it would go unnoticed. Chicago is denser at 10 miles and that's it. 1, 5, 20, 35, 50, 100 are all LA.

LA from 90006 Central

1 mile from 90006 population 101,108 density of 31,994

5 mile from 90006 population 1,255,618 density 16,606

10 miles from 90006 population 3,488,392 density 11,172

20 miles from 90006 population 7,852,902 density 7,044

35 miles from 90006 population 11,839,885 density 4,101

50 miles from 90006 population 14,394,795 density 2,646

100 miles from 90006 population 18,955,268 density 969

Chicago from 60602 the Loop

1 mile from 60602 population 66,202 density 22,365

5 miles from 60602 population 733,359 density 16,157

10 miles from 60602 population 2,499,627 density 14,454

20 miles from 60602 population 4,539,545 density 6,718

35 miles from 60602 population 7,552,714 density 3,447

50 miles from 60602 population 9,201,466 density 1,878

100 miles from 60602 population 13,253,047 density 559
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:20 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY $$$
6,836 posts, read 15,409,105 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrantiX View Post
LOL almost forgot about this guy when it turned into a DC vs San Francisco thing, he tried to sneak his incorrect condescending insults in thinking it would go unnoticed. Chicago is denser at 10 miles and that's it. 1, 5, 20, 35, 50, 100 are all LA.

LA from 90006 Central

1 mile from 90006 population 101,108 density of 31,994

5 mile from 90006 population 1,255,618 density 16,606

10 miles from 90006 population 3,488,392 density 11,172

20 miles from 90006 population 7,852,902 density 7,044

35 miles from 90006 population 11,839,885 density 4,101

50 miles from 90006 population 14,394,795 density 2,646

100 miles from 90006 population 18,955,268 density 969

Chicago from 60602 the Loop

1 mile from 60602 population 66,202 density 22,365

5 miles from 60602 population 733,359 density 16,157

10 miles from 60602 population 2,499,627 density 14,454

20 miles from 60602 population 4,539,545 density 6,718

35 miles from 60602 population 7,552,714 density 3,447

50 miles from 60602 population 9,201,466 density 1,878

100 miles from 60602 population 13,253,047 density 559
not this loser again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:21 AM
 
Location: Nob Hill, San Francisco, CA
2,342 posts, read 3,990,299 times
Reputation: 1088
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycjowww View Post
not this loser again.
That's so cute! I have so many NYC fans!!

What was it about the post that you found offensive? Point me in the right direction here compadre, was it the facts? The density of LA > Chicago? Or just LA > Chicago in general?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:24 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY $$$
6,836 posts, read 15,409,105 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrantiX View Post
What could I help you with joww? Want me to point you to the channel Snooki and JWOWWW are on? Or do you want me to point you to this facts again? LOL
i had my name before jersey shore. . i dont care about your facts cause nyc is superior to l.a. now can you serve me my burrito please?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:24 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,416,286 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycjowww View Post
not this loser again.
This a pretty awful reply to what was a solid factual rebuttal to 8bloody's post. Some people can't accept that L.A. is much more than low density suburbia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:25 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY $$$
6,836 posts, read 15,409,105 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrantiX View Post
That's so cute! I have so many NYC fans!!

What was it about the post did you find offensive? Point me in the right direction here compadre, was it the facts? The density of LA > Chicago? Or just LA > Chicago in general?
who are you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:26 AM
 
Location: Nob Hill, San Francisco, CA
2,342 posts, read 3,990,299 times
Reputation: 1088
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycjowww View Post
i had my name before jersey shore. . i dont care about your facts cause nyc is superior to l.a. now can you serve me my burrito please?
LOL you must be one of those eastern folks that substitute one of your eastern cities with another one to make an argument, in this case Chicago -> NYC. I'm pretty sure I was talking about Chicago and LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:26 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY $$$
6,836 posts, read 15,409,105 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
This a pretty awful reply to what was a solid factual rebuttal to 8bloody's post. Some people can't accept that L.A. is much more than low density suburbia.
lmao wth i could careless about his factual post. that poster is bias as hell and usually rants on most threads with the name LA on it.

like this guy came on a thread and literally told me i couldn't afford to live in my city without even knowing who i was was or what my background was.

He actually beleives that all of Americans problems will be solved if they follow LA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2012, 12:28 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY $$$
6,836 posts, read 15,409,105 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrantiX View Post
LOL you must be one of those eastern folks that substitute one of your eastern cities with another one to make an argument, in this case Chicago -> NYC. I'm pretty sure I was talking about Chicago and LA.
chicago is none of your business. that city is doing well without haters like you.

chicago , nyc, philly , jersey, dmv, and Florida is all american needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top