Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-21-2010, 07:42 AM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,561,880 times
Reputation: 6790

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
The Catholic Church had to drag itself into the 21st century with regard to evolution so I suppose changing it's mind on condoms was inevitable.
The Catholic Church never placed Charles Darwin on the Index, his grandpa Erasmus was for something similar I grant that, and even the 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia does not condemn all evolution as such.

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Catholics and Evolution

Humani Generis in 1950 is basically neutral on evolution or indicates you may believe or disbelieve it, but be cautious. Pius XII also accepted the Big Bang theory before some physicists did, although possibly for "the wrong reasons." So I'm not entirely sure what you mean unless you are referring to things from before WWI or that neutrality is as blameworthy as rejection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2010, 07:58 AM
 
2,958 posts, read 2,561,004 times
Reputation: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas R. View Post
Pius XII also accepted the Big Bang theory before some physicists did.
A god on earth who was also versed in quantum mechanics and theorethical physics...LOL! You got anything else of value?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2010, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Southern NC
2,203 posts, read 5,085,781 times
Reputation: 3835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Considering that worldwide, HIV is mostly spread by heterosexuals it's a rather ignorant opinion.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2010, 08:51 AM
 
2,958 posts, read 2,561,004 times
Reputation: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC~Mom View Post
Exactly.
Not to mention that in the early days at least 10% was spread through blood transfusions. Better lab controls have made that unlikely today but it was a strong contributor.

Last edited by Melvin.George; 11-21-2010 at 09:01 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2010, 09:44 AM
 
Location: New York City
5,553 posts, read 8,005,762 times
Reputation: 1362
MESSAGE TO POPE:

The year 1214 called and it wants its relevance back!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2010, 10:15 AM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,505,038 times
Reputation: 1775
In the U.S., nearly half of the people living with HIV are men who have sex with men. (48%) Yet that population probably makes up less than 5% of the population.

Powered by Google Docs

Men who have sex with men are catching HIV at the rate of 44X that of straight men or women.

“Based on an analysis of nationally representative surveys, CDC estimated that MSM [men who have sex with men] comprise 2.0 percent (range: 1.4-2.7 percent) of the overall U.S. population aged 13 and older, or 4 percent of the U.S. male population (range 2.8-5.3 percent),” says the summary statement. It says the analysis found that the range of new HIV diagnoses per 100,000 MSM was 522 to 989. By comparison, newly diagnosed HIV cases came to just 12 per 100,000 for other men and 13 per 100,000 for women. For syphilis, the range of newly diagnosed cases for MSM was 91 to 173 cases per 100,000 compared to 2 per 100,000 for other men and 1 per 100,000 for women.

Read more: http://www.*****ty.com/you-are-all-d...#ixzz15wEhbREz
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2010, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,188,106 times
Reputation: 6963
The Pope is still too restricting. Condoms should be acceptable for everyone from 13 years old and up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2010, 11:07 AM
 
2,958 posts, read 2,561,004 times
Reputation: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visvaldis View Post
The Pope is still too restricting. Condoms should be acceptable for everyone from 13 years old and up.
Before I'd pay any attention to what any pope says I'd sooner listen to my german shepherd dog growl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2010, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,441 posts, read 12,793,000 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visvaldis View Post
The Pope is still too restricting. Condoms should be acceptable for everyone from 13 years old and up.
Do you have kids?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2010, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,188,106 times
Reputation: 6963
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post
Do you have kids?
Sure! I have an 18 year old son. The 43 year old divorcee living next door is teaching him many good erotic things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top