Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Does anyone want to discuss some of the problems with their story. Let take the first day. Linda Arndt, was not the first one there. But the other officers left her there alone, after awhile. Patsy claims she was coming down the kitchen stairs, when she saw the note on the bottom steps and stepped over it to read it. Then ran upstairs to JB's bedroom and then yelled to JR. Here are the points about this 1. She was wearing her christmas clothes that she wore the day before. People said this was not like her. 2. She stepped over the note and started reading it on the stairs. 3. I thought it was strange that she would yell from the 2nd floor to the 3rd floor to get JR, and into his bathroom. But she didn't wake Burke. Could JR have even heard her? Does he shut the BR door or leave it open? Did anyone try to find out? 4. At some point JR is on the kitchen floor reading the note. The three pages are spread out on the floor? 5 The parents say that JB was sleeping when they brought her into the house the night before but Burke says she was awake?
6 First JR tells the cop he put JB to bed but then they change their story and say he just laid her down and Patsy changed her clothes but she never woke up? That is why it took them months to be interviewed. They needed time to get there story straight.
I was alway thinking it had to do with Burke. There was a story leaked about his interview with a therapist. His answers were very weird. And now he won't talk to law enforcement. I can't think of any reason he wouldn't.
I can. He was a little kid who heard something but was told that he didn't hear it, was shuffled off to the side, and told to keep his mouth shut.
I've had that suspicion, too, virgode. That JonBenet had pineapple in her stomach and the parents deny that she had eaten pineapple the night before indicates, to me, that she could have known her attacker. I have never thought that the parents had anything to do with her murder but I can see how/why their actions after-the-fact would arouse suspicions e.g.. refusing to take polygraphs, getting their own lawyer immediately.
Those are their constitutionally protected rights and no inference of guilt is supposed to be made against anyone who does such things.
The little girl is dead. Many would say that she is resting in more peace than she ever did in life. I and others, have no intention of letting the killers "rest in peace".
I agree. It's a tragedy that this is considered a cold case.
So many times when a child dies, the family is suspected. I don't know who killed Jon Benet, but I think it is important to note that this was an isolated event, there have not been any other crimes similar to this in the Boulder area, or even other places. Not a serial child predator. That can be ruled out.
If it was a person outside of the family, the person had to have familiarity with the home, the people in the home, and lack of alarms, dogs, or security. I don't recall the family identifying a person like that to be investigated.
I am pretty sure if this happened in my home, and I was accused of the crime, and I knew I was innocent, I would have hired private investigators to follow up on things, if the police were solely focused on me. I don't recall the family doing this.
The lack of any substantial evidence, or new information really makes this a cold case, someone knows something, and to be silent this long, is very interesting. Covering up for someone. Only family loyalty can create that silence.
So many times when a child dies, the family is suspected. I don't know who killed Jon Benet, but I think it is important to note that this was an isolated event, there have not been any other crimes similar to this in the Boulder area, or even other places. Not a serial child predator. That can be ruled out.
If it was a person outside of the family, the person had to have familiarity with the home, the people in the home, and lack of alarms, dogs, or security. I don't recall the family identifying a person like that to be investigated.
I am pretty sure if this happened in my home, and I was accused of the crime, and I knew I was innocent, I would have hired private investigators to follow up on things, if the police were solely focused on me. I don't recall the family doing this.
The lack of any substantial evidence, or new information really makes this a cold case, someone knows something, and to be silent this long, is very interesting. Covering up for someone. Only family loyalty can create that silence.
You are citing lack of action on the Ramsey family's part in order to incriminate them.
That is a rather weak argument.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
