Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i don't think of it so much as a way to make money or generate revenue, but more as a way to keep marriage partners on their better behavior, and appreciate what they have in their partner, and take some responsibility each of them for nourishing and tending the marriage. Just like a garden, if it's not fed and watered, it dies and stops blossoming.
i always liked the idea of having to re-decide every year or few years whether to stay together or not.
One can provide links to anything. If someone chooses to say the Earth is flat, he can provide links to that, too. (Go ahead, Huck -- report me any time I call you on this nonsense.) I'm sure you can provide links -- you just can't provide any that are verifiable or that don't manipulate the data.
More government bureaucracy and legislation and hoops to jump through? Standing in line at some cheerless grey dungeon while joyless drones make minimum wage to approve my paperwork? Sounds super awesome!!
I haven't read all the post but, I think there should be a 2 year trail period. If the couple decides to stay together, then they can renew for a permanent marriage licence or go there separate ways. If there are kids involve before or during the trial period, then the marriage becomes permanent and the only way of separation is through divorce. The 2 years is good, because it gives the couple time to get through the adjustment period of marraige and really find out if they are meant for one another.
If you marry the right person, the expiration date occurs when the husband or wife dies. People involved in a succession of train wreck "relationships" never seem to get this.
I saw this on Yahoo News. Someone was proposing that the initial contract for a marriage last seven years, at which time you could either walk away or sign on for another seven. As a news commentator pointed out, you'd still have to divorce for all intents and purposes if you didn't want to renew after the first seven years so it really doesn't solve or change anything.
To me, this really doesn't sound like a bad idea at all. It makes things more serious than just a one-year, yet one partner can't just go abusing the other right, left and center because s/he "can't get out of it" without a "messy divorce".
I realize the legalities (children; property; etc.) could make things really sticky and people could wind up getting hurt, especially the children...but let's face it, children REALLY get hurt during an ugly divorce.
I wish this existed...I really do...I think it's brilliant. There would be a lot of kinks to work out but it would sure make each partner try harder...IMO. There would be a lot less taking a person for granted.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.