Florida Doctor posts sign in office to tell Obama supporters to get lost! (Pelosi, speech)

[Sunny-Days-in-Florida]

Originally Posted by seyareno

Wow We have gone through 10 posts and the libs haven't called him racist yet.

Believe me they have been thinking about it.

The doctor is suppose to LOSE money and stay in business because a political figure named Obama is forcing him to lose money.

How dare Obama force his political BS on a doctor who is well respected and has helped so many people.

[WillysB]

Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv

If he happens to perform abortions he's already used to being on guard.

crbcrbrgv, the link describes the doctor as a urologist. Has more to do with urine than the birth canal. Urine, that's why one takes a p!55.

[EinsteinsGhost]

Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal

Wouldn't it have been nice if Obama had cared more about doctors practicing medicine than he did about playing politics with the citizen's confidential relationship with his/her medical doctor!

Like these doctors? Or these doctors? Or doctors and organizations of physicians mentioned here? Or, like the drama queen referred to in the OP?

[TXTwizter]

I guess the term, "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" can be applied here. More power to him. To bad most people don't have the balls to do what he did.

[plannine]

Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal

Only one little problem: "I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know."

Obamacare eliminates that patient privacy and neither the physician nor the patient have any say in the matter. Our medical records become an open book for any government employee or bureaucracy the HHS Secretary deems appropriate.

What ever was covered under HIPPA still is and anything else is no different then it's been since the Privacy Act of 1974 was enacted. And the Patroit Act, takes care of anything left.

Nothing has changed.

[lifelongMOgal]

Originally Posted by plannine

What ever was covered under HIPPA still is and anything else is no different then it's been since the Privacy Act of 1974 was enacted.

Nothing has changed.

Not true.

[Marksman84]

Originally Posted by WillysB

crbcrbrgv, the link describes the doctor as a urologist. Has more to do with urine than the birth canal. Urine, that's why one takes a p!55.

Some may enter the world through the urinary tract:

[AnUnidentifiedMale]

Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal

His private practice; his right to choose who he wants as patients, for the mean time. The beauty of owning one's own business.

Not entirely. I don't think it would be legal for him to reject patients based on skin color or religion, for example.

[plannine]

Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal

Not true.

Forgot to add, and the Patriot Act covers anything else.

The government has had access to medical records when and if they wanted for decades.

But why would they bother?

[Sunny-Days-in-Florida]

Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale

Not entirely. I don't think it would be legal for him to reject patients based on skin color or religion, for example.

Here we go, libs using the race card. Did not take long.

So what color would he be rejecting, white men and women?