Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you support giving Ukraine F-16s
Yes 201 39.64%
No 257 50.69%
Unsure 49 9.66%
Voters: 507. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:01 AM
 
3,573 posts, read 1,198,783 times
Reputation: 375

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
Basing views of the totality of this upon terms like "Offensive Invasion" as compared to "Defensive Attack" is of little use.
Yet...some seem to put all the stock backing their views upon the idea of a "Offensive Invasion" of Ukraine by Russia/Putin.
"Putin invaded Ukraine...it's as simple as that!"...to justify this whole, terrible conflict...is standard from many.
It is much more complex than that. Though I am surprised how many are stuck on that false narrative, as it is certainly not indicative of all the factors involved.
But all they can do is keep repeating it...I guess, to assuage their tweaked-out headtrips.
Soviet Union was not a very popular alternative, it collapsed and situation became worse. Ukr. ethnically very close to Russians, maybe identical. Ukr did not really have choice , nobody asked ex- Soviets in Ukr what they want...Now they are suppressed by the war. Russia gave them a choice. At leasrt they can choose which language to speek.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Anchorage
2,203 posts, read 1,792,465 times
Reputation: 5825
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbrains View Post
He has a dictionary, and typically takes the pedantic path opposite to his current stance.

He plays silly definition games with it on other forums, doing something very analogous to posting the definition of invasion, then pointing to the 5th obscure meaning and claiming that it is the most important definition of all.

I find his current arguments rather hypocritical.

I find his arguments straight up demented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:10 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,453 posts, read 108,880,609 times
Reputation: 116560
Quote:
and quit trying for NATO/EU membership
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbrains;

Again, those options would be Ukraine's to pursue, not Russia's to dictate.
And those options ultimately would be up to the EU and NATO to accept or reject. So far, NATO in its wisdom, has rejected Ukraine's bid to join, in spite of the myopic "democratization" crusade 3 consecutive US presidents have been obsessed with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:23 AM
 
3,573 posts, read 1,198,783 times
Reputation: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
And those options ultimately would be up to the EU and NATO to accept or reject. So far, NATO in its wisdom, has rejected Ukraine's bid to join, in spite of the myopic "democratization" crusade 3 consecutive US presidents have been obsessed with.
NATO does not care about UKR, they ready to wipe it out completely, to the last human being there. They want to prolong the war hoping Russians rise against Putin regime and topple it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:26 AM
 
21,422 posts, read 7,520,927 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
Nope...not even from that standpoint.
A preemptive attack on a opposing force that is building to make a move on you...is not a "invasion".

If Putin was staging a "invasion"...it would have looked way different.
So already the historical revisionism begins the blood of 100,000 dead Russian boys has not even all dried yet.

Ukraine was not building to move on anyone, and there is no justification for a "pre-emptive strike". BTW ... Ukraine would have known that any such attack would have been futile, they had nothing whatsoever to gain by it. I don't know how anyone could fall for this Olgino BS.

Crossing Ukraine's borders with armed military personnel was an act of war. The decision was made by Putin ... Putin alone, and the reason he gave had nothing to do with a "pre-emptive strike". It was to topple a regime which he claimed was run by Nazis and to ostensibly "liberate" the people he is now trying to bomb into the stone age. That's right, the people Putin claimed to care so much about he is killing in astonishing numbers.

And the 'liberation' claim was doubly false, because the ultimate goal was to annex, not liberate Ukraine. They have shown their hand already and it is a fact of history.

The entire premise for the Russian invasion of Ukraine was false from the day it was announced. Crossing the borders was an act of aggression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:29 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,139,568 times
Reputation: 21920
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.Duval View Post
Soviet Union was not a very popular alternative, it collapsed and situation became worse. Ukr. ethnically very close to Russians, maybe identical. Ukr did not really have choice , nobody asked ex- Soviets in Ukr what they want...Now they are suppressed by the war. Russia gave them a choice. At leasrt they can choose which language to speek.
There was a referendum on 8/24/1991 asking everybody in Ukraine if they wanted independence from the Russian Federation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_U...0August%201991.

92% of the population voted for independence, and 55% of ethnic Russians also voted for independence.

Ukraine does not restrict the language spoken by its citizens. The official language is Ukrainian, many people also speak Russian, English is taught in schools.

Everything you state in your post is wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:38 AM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,702,186 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawk55732 View Post
Invade is the correct word.
How about "Preemptive Defensive Invasion"?
Would that make you feel better...as long as the word you go all Fangirly about is in there?
Hey...anything to help you find inner peace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:41 AM
 
3,573 posts, read 1,198,783 times
Reputation: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbrains View Post
There was a referendum on 8/24/1991 asking everybody in Ukraine if they wanted independence from the Russian Federation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_U...0August%201991.

92% of the population voted for independence, and 55% of ethnic Russians also voted for independence.

Ukraine does not restrict the language spoken by its citizens. The official language is Ukrainian, many people also speak Russian, English is taught in schools.

Everything you state in your post is wrong.
Well, Eastern (Russian-Soviet) part was not happy rith rise if Nazi sentiments... , that is why war started, in the same way West hopes to topple Putin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,817 posts, read 2,761,970 times
Reputation: 3388
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.Duval View Post
Well, Eastern (Russian-Soviet) part was not happy rith rise if Nazi sentiments... , that is why war started, in the same way West hopes to topple Putin.
So they sent in the Wagner Group??? Makes alot of sense. The only country behaving like Nazi's is Russia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2022, 10:44 AM
 
21,422 posts, read 7,520,927 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by G.Duval View Post
NATO does not care about UKR, they ready to wipe it out completely, to the last human being there. They want to prolong the war hoping Russians rise against Putin regime and topple it.
NATO cares about NATO members, and the aggression Putin's Russia shows against it's non-NATO neighbors is a wake up call. This attack on Ukraine has re-animated NATO like nothing before. The people in NATO want to be safe, and the aggressive actions of Russia are a clear and present danger to everyone.

If Russia gets away with this they will be a perennial threat to the people of NATO countries.

In other words, the prime mover here is Putin. Putin's decision to attack a neighboring country came first, and NATO has reacted to it. This invasion was so alarming that the two long neutral countries of Sweden and Finland will not risk being caught outside of an alliance any longer if they can help it. Russia is perceived as a very real threat to everyone within it's reach.

Helping Ukraine is in everyone's best interest, and if in the process Russia's ability to launch unprovoked attacks on it's neighbors is degraded, that is a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top