Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A Utah judge has ordered that a foster child being raised by a lesbian couple be taken away and given to a heterosexual couple. There is nothing in Utah law where the sexual preferences of foster parents matters, The judge did this because, he believes, it is better for the child. These strikes me as outrageous. Do conservatives support this kind of judicial activism?
A Utah judge has ordered that a foster child being raised by a lesbian couple be taken away and given to a heterosexual couple. There is nothing in Utah law where the sexual preferences of foster parents matters, The judge did this because, he believes, it is better for the child. These strikes me as outrageous. Do conservatives support this kind of judicial activism?
A Utah judge has ordered that a foster child being raised by a lesbian couple be taken away and given to a heterosexual couple. There is nothing in Utah law where the sexual preferences of foster parents matters, The judge did this because, he believes, it is better for the child. These strikes me as outrageous. Do conservatives support this kind of judicial activism?
Utah Gov. Gary Herbert, a Republican, told reporters Thursday that he's puzzled by the ruling. He criticized "activism on the bench in any way, shape or form" and said the judge should follow the law even he doesn't like it.
A Utah judge has ordered that a foster child being raised by a lesbian couple be taken away and given to a heterosexual couple. There is nothing in Utah law where the sexual preferences of foster parents matters, The judge did this because, he believes, it is better for the child. These strikes me as outrageous. Do conservatives support this kind of judicial activism?
If the child is old enough they should consult the child. It is amazing to me that it is almost NEVER about what the child wants.
I am a party line republican voter and do not have a problem with gay couples raising children. There is a lot of need and gay couples can help fill it. That being said, it should be about the child's happiness.
If the child is old enough they should consult the child. It is amazing to me that it is almost NEVER about what the child wants.
I am a party line republican voter and do not have a problem with gay couples raising children. There is a lot of need and gay couples can help fill it. That being said, it should be about the child's happiness.
If you bothered to read the article posted, you'd know that the child is a 3 month old infant.
This is not surprising in Utah where a thin line separates church and state. But I think even the LDS church would disapprove of just ignoring the law by a judge.
A Utah judge has ordered that a foster child being raised by a lesbian couple be taken away and given to a heterosexual couple. There is nothing in Utah law where the sexual preferences of foster parents matters, The judge did this because, he believes, it is better for the child. These strikes me as outrageous. Do conservatives support this kind of judicial activism?
After considering two guys are turning a little girl into a fruit loop, my answer is yes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.