Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,879 posts, read 20,828,250 times
Reputation: 14874

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahrie View Post
Obviously, any heterosexual couple that is caring for children in the foster care system will have undergone extensive background checks and training. Traditional role models, in this case, refer to one stable and loving mother and one stable and loving father. These aren't the kind of people who are 'responsible for the huge number of children who are in the foster care system to begin with.' Frankly, that is an absurd contention.
ANY couple that has been licensed as foster parents has undergone extensive background checks and training.
Or are you suggesting otherwise?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:10 AM
 
Location: State of Grace
1,608 posts, read 1,497,330 times
Reputation: 2697
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
ANY couple that has been licensed as foster parents has undergone extensive background checks and training.
Or are you suggesting otherwise?

Not at all, and neither am I questioning the ability of the lesbian couple to physically care for the baby. What I am suggesting is that any child would fare better psychologically in a mom and pop family setting, so I agree with the judge's ruling and believe that the baby will be healthier for it - that's all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,855 posts, read 13,880,527 times
Reputation: 15490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahrie View Post
Not at all, and neither am I questioning the ability of the lesbian couple to physically care for the baby. What I am suggesting is that any child would fare better psychologically in a mom and pop family setting, so I agree with the judge's ruling and believe that the baby will be healthier for it - that's all.
Judge is already backpedaling.

Judge rescinds order to remove baby from lesbian couple - CNN.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:20 AM
 
Location: State of Grace
1,608 posts, read 1,497,330 times
Reputation: 2697
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Well, that was predictable, but I doubt that it'll change the opinions of posters who've bothered to weigh in on the subject; it doesn't change mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:22 AM
 
2,851 posts, read 3,487,973 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The left? I'm pro life so I support those who are willing and able to take in the unwanted children.
Which is different from the reasoning by the left. I applaud those able to take kids who have been dumped into the system myself, I just find hypocrisy loathsome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,855 posts, read 13,880,527 times
Reputation: 15490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahrie View Post
Well, that was predictable, but I doubt that it'll change the opinions of posters who've bothered to weigh in on the subject; it doesn't change mine.
Here's an interesting - and possibly related - about mormon attitudes regarding the children of gay people - Backlash Over Mormon LGBT Rule Change Spreads Among Faithful - ABC News

Keep in mind that the mormon church was a major funder of anti-SSM initiatives in the recent past.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:43 AM
 
79,911 posts, read 44,490,291 times
Reputation: 17214
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverBulletZ06 View Post
Which is different from the reasoning by the left. I applaud those able to take kids who have been dumped into the system myself, I just find hypocrisy loathsome.
I hear you loud and clear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:45 AM
 
79,911 posts, read 44,490,291 times
Reputation: 17214
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Here's an interesting - and possibly related - about mormon attitudes regarding the children of gay people - Backlash Over Mormon LGBT Rule Change Spreads Among Faithful - ABC News

Keep in mind that the mormon church was a major funder of anti-SSM initiatives in the recent past.
By and large blacks and Hispanics are not Mormons and they are the groups that defeated SSM in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,855 posts, read 13,880,527 times
Reputation: 15490
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
By and large blacks and Hispanics are not Mormons and they are the groups that defeated SSM in California.
Didn't say different. Just pointing out that even mormons in good standing in utah are not uniformly opposed to gay parental rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:57 AM
 
79,911 posts, read 44,490,291 times
Reputation: 17214
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Didn't say different. Just pointing out that even mormons in good standing in utah are not uniformly opposed to gay parental rights.
My apologies here. In everyone of these kinds of topics it seems it gets blamed on the Mormons (yes, that is a bit of a generalization) and mine was a knee jerk reaction to that.

In this rare instance it's actually relevant, so I'm sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top