Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think you misunderstood me. I don't mean legally qualified. I mean qualified in the sense that he can adequately perform the job as President of the United States. Currently, many people are doubting he can.
Yes, I agree with you. Herein lies another problem though:
While Obama hasn't done squat with his "hope and change", he knows he can continue running on the right side of the political spectrum because he knows just what extreme there is even further to the right within the republican party, so unless a serious challenger can nail Obama in the primaries, it'll be like voting for a republican vs a crazier republican in 2012.
Two.
The "democrats" i.e. liberals in US politics need to have their politicians vetted a little more carefully before promoting them as saints and gods...
Three.
Liberals and their "issues" are way to ephemeral for any rational person to follow let alone ghetto intellectuals like B.H. Obama. They make inconsistent and knee-jerk reactionary instantaneous demands that simply cannot be complied with. (Perhaps that's half the point)
Two.
The "democrats" i.e. liberals in US politics need to have their politicians vetted a little more carefully before promoting them as saints and gods...
Three.
Liberals and their "issues" are way to ephemeral for any rational person to follow let alone ghetto intellectuals like B.H. Obama. They make inconsistent and knee-jerk reactionary instantaneous demands that simply cannot be complied with. (Perhaps that's half the point)
Liberals:
They truly deserve what they get.
Name one liberal bill Obama has passed during his presidency...
The Wealthcare Bill doesn't count (centrist) and the Financial Reform Bill doesn't count (centrist).
DADT, MAYBE, but another than that, name one more...
Note: this is just to the liberals out there--not trying to single-handedly ignore any conservatives out there, but I'd just like to get a wide range of opinions on who has given up on the president after his latest moves which tick off more and more of his base.
Assuming Obama still runs next year ( makes you wonder if he's really even trying sometimes ) regardless of who he's up against, would you still re-vote for him again, and if so, can you elaborate why?
Thanks!
Yes, I voted Obama 2008.
No, I am not very happy with the way he wasted his mandate to govern, and I am particularly upset about UHC and the stimulus being watered down to meaningles status.
Yes I will vote Obama 2012.
Reasons: Palin, Bachmann, Paul, Perry, Cain, etc.
Field a real candidate to oppose him and I will vote for him or her.
The Repub. party is way to far to the right. It is starting to embrace almost facist policies. See Wis. and Ohio. They can't be trusted because when they take power the nonsence begins.
They are all in with obama. They might grouse and complain, but they will support him to the bitter end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interlude
Assuming you're referring to the other thread, read my response. It's not bankrupt.
You mean all those IOUs count? Do you know how many TRILLIONS in unfunded liabilities there are?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Weather
Name one liberal bill Obama has passed during his presidency...
The Wealthcare Bill doesn't count (centrist) and the Financial Reform Bill doesn't count (centrist).
DADT, MAYBE, but another than that, name one more...
Oh yes, they all count. Obamacare, rammed through. Stimulus, rammed through. Financial reform, rammed through.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.