Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:40 AM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,959,940 times
Reputation: 2618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine View Post
Too bad capitalism would have only offered $1 to cut the yard, then charged him 1.25 for use of the lawnmower.
The power of choice dictates the terms. If the work is more than the pay provided for it, I choose not to do the job as it results in a loss. As for the lawnmower, if I am in a position that needs one, I go to one of the other neighbors and tell him I will pay him a percentage of what I earn to use it to cover the cost of wear and provide him a reasonable profit in the exchange. He can agree or disagree, but the power of choice continues to dictate the terms.

The result is, the guy who wants his yard cut for a dollar ends up cutting his own yard AND paying for the upkeep of his equipment because nobody would be stupid enough to waste their time on the deal that was proposed.

Choice is integral to the power of the system. Failure to evaluate that contingency results in a false explanation of the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Europe
2,735 posts, read 2,465,477 times
Reputation: 639
I just imagine what a child will do when his parents suddenly die.
Next day he will go to the adoption agency and ask for new parents? The adoption agency, because the system will have no supervision, can pretty much do whatever it wants with the child. The highest bidder, some pervert, can buy the child because you know supply and demand will be in equilibrium then. No child protective services will be there to take care of the child.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,279,391 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioIstheBest View Post
Private insurance companies offer forms of unemployment insurance.

Don't you know anything about capitalism?
Sorry Bud - unemployment is issued by the State(s)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,510,652 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Capitalism is where private enterprise decides what services to provide - what product to manufactuer - what price to charge - and how much to pay the workers.

As it is now, the Government is not allowing for freedom in these areas by dictating standards, dictating wages, dictating who a company has to hire and so on.

But, capitalism does NOT include issues such as providing national defense, interstate commerce, and the nations general welfare.

I would suggest that "Ohio" read and study the Constitution of the United States. To date he/she has not.

Where in my example did I say we were in the United States and subject to U.S. laws?

And you are wrong. The workers also decide what they are paid. Consumers decise what the private enterprise will manufactuer and what price will be charged. Capitalism is a two way street.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,510,652 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Sorry Bud - unemployment is issued by the State(s)
True. Unemployment is issed by the state. If they got out of the way then there would be no unemployment.

It is possible to buy unemployment insurance from private insurance companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Europe
2,735 posts, read 2,465,477 times
Reputation: 639
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlassoff View Post
Or what if the private insurance companies decided simply not to pay claims. (See: Health Insurance Companies). Who would enforce the rules? This whole no government hypothetical is too ridiculous for words.
Good point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:44 AM
 
Location: In the desert
4,049 posts, read 2,743,950 times
Reputation: 2483
This a a cute story by the OP to indoctrinate a child to a completely one-sided view & nothing else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,510,652 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
The power of choice dictates the terms. If the work is more than the pay provided for it, I choose not to do the job as it results in a loss. As for the lawnmower, if I am in a position that needs one, I go to one of the other neighbors and tell him I will pay him a percentage of what I earn to use it to cover the cost of wear and provide him a reasonable profit in the exchange. He can agree or disagree, but the power of choice continues to dictate the terms.

The result is, the guy who wants his yard cut for a dollar ends up cutting his own yard AND paying for the upkeep of his equipment because nobody would be stupid enough to waste their time on the deal that was proposed.

Choice is integral to the power of the system. Failure to evaluate that contingency results in a false explanation of the system.
Nice to see someone else understands how things work when people are free to make their own decisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:45 AM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,399,220 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioIstheBest View Post
Capitalism versus Socialism

I wanted my yard mowed and I wanted to teach my son, now 13, the difference between capitalism and socialism.

So, I went to my son this summer and offered him $20 to cut the grass. He immediately went to work. I told him that is how capitalism works. Someone needs some product or service. Someone else is willing to fill that need. The 2 parties come to a mutual agreement on what the terms of labor and payment will be. Everyone leaves happy. If one party is not satisfied they are free to not do business with the person. He was very happy when I gave him the $20

And he learned a valuable lesson: Hard work has rewards.

The next week the grass needed mowed again. This time I decided to show him how socialism works. He cut the grass and came to me and asked to be paid the same $20. I withheld $8 and told him this was for federal income tax. I gave $2 to his younger sister, who did no work, and told him this was only fair. I withheld $4 and told him it was for union dues. (Because he needs a union to tell him I ripped him off last week). I withheld another $5 and told him that it was for the administrative costs of dividing up the money. I gave him the one dollar that was left over.

When he cried for receiving $1 for doing the same thing he did last week but received 20 times the amount of money, I told him to stop being “selfish” and “greedy” and called him a racist.

And he learned a valuable lesson: Hard work gets you nowhere.
That is not exactly capitalism, because there is no competition to provide services. If it were capitalism you would have gathered all the neighbor kids along with your son, his little sister, the unemployed young adults and if your were unscrupulous some local illegal immigrants and had them all bid for who would do the job the cheapest and taken the offer of the kid who would do it for $.50.

Last edited by Randomstudent; 10-17-2010 at 10:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,279,391 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioIstheBest View Post
Where in my example did I say we were in the United States and subject to U.S. laws?

And you are wrong. The workers also decide what they are paid. Consumers decise what the private enterprise will manufactuer and what price will be charged. Capitalism is a two way street.
Capitalism is subject to a "law" - an economic law - the law of supply and demand

You say you don't want / need government. I say you are naive at best.

I agree that the US government is far to large but, government is needed to maintain order.

And if you are not in the US as you suggest, then I'd guess you are in the EU - and thank goodness you have government there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top