Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-30-2015, 11:45 AM
 
831 posts, read 881,516 times
Reputation: 676

Advertisements

Interesting article. What goes around, comes around.

How Tasteless Suburbs Become Beloved Urban Neighborhoods - The Atlantic

Quote:
The problem with the immaculate-conception theory is that, like parents swearing that they would never have behaved the way their kids do, it is conveniently forgetful about what actually happened in the past. Taking, just as an example, the kind of housing that this theory romanticizes—the early 20th century bungalow boom—a closer look reveals that it was defined not by mass affordability, efficiency, and respect for traditional communities, but something very nearly the opposite.

To begin with, many of the arbiters of taste of the bungalow era believed those new bungalow neighborhoods “ruined” the character of the places they were built, just as new apartment buildings are maligned today. They even had a snappy put-down for it: “bungalow disease.” “Tradition has broken down,” wrote the British planner Thomas Sharp, describing a proliferation of bungalows on both sides of the Atlantic, and “taste is utterly debased … The old trees and hedgerows … have given place to concrete posts and avenues of telegraph poles, to hoardings and enamel advertising signs.” Architectural Record reviewed Seattle’s building boom in 1912 and, in an otherwise positive article, pronounced the quality of its new homes “disappointing.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-30-2015, 02:02 PM
 
994 posts, read 903,221 times
Reputation: 923
What are some examples of Pittsburgh suburbs that become beloved urban neighborhoods?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 02:15 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,563,132 times
Reputation: 6392
Oakland was developed as a suburb after the 1845 fire. Eventually, the city annexed it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 03:59 PM
 
1,303 posts, read 1,818,655 times
Reputation: 2486
I moved from NYC. Most urban Pittsburgh neighborhoods look like the suburbs to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
7,541 posts, read 10,281,530 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainDewGuy View Post
What are some examples of Pittsburgh suburbs that become beloved urban neighborhoods?
Sheraden and Esplen used to be suburbs, ditto for Beltzhoover and Montooth boroughs which were absorbed into the city back in the day.

Chartiers Twp., Westwood, Elliot, Temperanceville, West Pittsburgh, Allentown, Carrick, Brushton, Sterrett, etc., were all founded as parts of suburbia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 05:52 PM
 
716 posts, read 767,959 times
Reputation: 1013
Quote:
Originally Posted by ny789987 View Post
I moved from NYC. Most urban Pittsburgh neighborhoods look like the suburbs to me.
Moved here from NYC too. Looking at all five boroughs as the city and generally urban that's really a stretch. That said I would agree that the quality of NYC suburbs greatly surpasses the quality of PGH suburbs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 06:15 PM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 26,045,866 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by ny789987 View Post
I moved from NYC. Most urban Pittsburgh neighborhoods look like the suburbs to me.
True! The only neighborhoods that are "urban" really are downtown and maybe the South Side, due to density. I would hardly call most places in Pittsburgh, "urban". Shadyside? Point Breeze? Squirrel Hill? Really? Spinal is more dense than any of those I mention. Even the Northside isn't really urban in comparison to large eastern cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 06:40 PM
 
1,653 posts, read 1,589,297 times
Reputation: 2822
This really is an interesting article, if people can avoid being distracted by the nonsense above about whether Pittsburgh is "urban" compared to nyc and read the article talking about the current perception of bungalow construction vs the perception at the time the then new neighborhoods were being built.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,354 posts, read 17,084,509 times
Reputation: 12427
I don't think there's any question that bungalows were a step down in terms of urbanity and elaborate design (at least in terms of the facade) compared to late Victorian styles which immediately preceded them. IMHO they were still better than what came around a generation later, but of course opinions differ.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Oakland was developed as a suburb after the 1845 fire. Eventually, the city annexed it.
I don't think this is right. Pittsburgh was limited to Downtown and the modern day Strip, Uptown, and the Hill District until essentially the entire East End was annexed in the late 1860s. At that time Bloomfield and Lawrenceville already existed as independent "villages" but Oakland was still mostly undeveloped farmland. By 1872 there was a small urban neighborhood right down by the Mon around the modern Birmingham Bridge. There were also knots of denser housing around S Craig and Oakland Avenue, but most of Oakland was still houses with large acreage (mostly farmland). Oakland was only really built out between 1890 and 1910 - arguably the last major "urban neighborhood" the city built before it turned to streetcar suburbia (indeed, it was built out roughly contemporaneously with more suburban-styled areas like Highland Park and Friendship).

If you go far enough back in Pittsburgh history, you'll see that even beloved urban neighborhoods like Allegheny West and Manchester were originally built out as "suburbs" of the city in the mid 19th century. Well-to-do people didn't want to live Downtown because it was filthy and noisy, but once there was a reliable bridge crossing the Allegheny, they could take a horsecar to quieter, more residential digs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 10:56 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,563,132 times
Reputation: 6392
All suburbs started out as farmland in our area. Before that, they were uninhabited wilderness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top