Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What is your retirement strategy?
I have no idea 27 12.16%
Savings/investments/house and I'm on track 105 47.30%
Savings/investment/house but I know I'm behind 37 16.67%
Corporate/gov pension so I don't need to worry 28 12.61%
I can just sell my house & downsize and should be ok 8 3.60%
I may just live abroad in a cheaper place 17 7.66%
Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2012, 04:38 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,925,326 times
Reputation: 32530

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by move4ward View Post
What are medical expenses like in retirement, when you are pushing 80? Is it all covered by Medicare? Do I need to plan for it?
Right now it is mostly covered by Medicare, but Medicare will undergo some changes going forward in order to remain solvent and it's hard to know how to plan for it. It is a complex area to calculate, and lots of ink has been spilled about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2012, 05:02 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,925,326 times
Reputation: 32530
Default Expenses in retirement versus expenses while working

Quote:
Originally Posted by hartford_renter View Post
That's what so called financial professionals say people need saved up.

I agree it is ridiculous it has no basis just like a lot of what they say. I spend about 30% of my gross income right now and I would end less if I were retired.
If you are spending 30% of your gross income right now (while working), that means two things: first, that you have good discipline, but second, that you have a very good income. That sort of skews the discussion when we talk in terms of percentages.

So what does it mean to spend 80% of one's former gross income when retired? If the former gross income was $200,000 per year, then of course actually spending $160,000 is living a very, very luxurious life and such a high amount is completely unnecessary. But the median family income in this country is about $50,000. In that case a person will not feel like living on $40,000 a year is living high on the hog, although it can be done in reasonable comfort without any real hardship. And the lower you go, the tighter that 80% would be to live on.

Therefore, to me, it makes more sense to talk about dollar amounts as opposed to percentages. But even in terms of dollar amounts, there are enormous variables as to what people consider their "needs"to be:

1. How much will you want to travel?
2. How will you travel - Motel 6 or luxury hotels? World travel or mostly in the U.S.?
3. How often will you eat out?
4. When you do eat out, will a meal cost $10 plus tax and tip, or much more?
5. What sort of car will you "need"? There is a tremendous range of costs here.
6. Same with housing (the tremendous range). Will you downsize because the kids are gone, etc.?
7. Entertainment? Will it be the TV at home? My luxury in retirement is good tickets to live classical music, perhaps about twice a month on average. These tickets are not cheap - about $100 and up.

So I do agree that the 80% rule of thumb is so broad as to be meaningless, largely because 80% means different things to people of different income levels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 05:40 AM
 
106,841 posts, read 109,092,448 times
Reputation: 80277
GOOD POST!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 10:43 AM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,731,080 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by move4ward View Post
What are medical expenses like in retirement, when you are pushing 80? Is it all covered by Medicare? Do I need to plan for it?
Quite a few around here also pay for supplemental and drug coverage.

For some, they pay more out than they have recieved... they do it for the peace of mind should something come up... they are covered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 05:01 PM
 
1,679 posts, read 3,020,685 times
Reputation: 1296
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
no one can speak for anyone else as far as their needs . what you need to retire is no different then the amounts of income we all need to live when we are working. there is no rule of thumb for the most part and everyone is unique.
Well we need to tell the financial professionals that. The professionals say you need to spend 80% of your gross income in retirement and you will need to save up enough to withdraw only 4%.

For a typical family with 2 children earning 50K per year. They would need 40K in retirement and social security would cover approximately 1700 per month. So they need about 20K from their savings per year.

For the last 50 years people have been retiring with these parameters and they have done just fine. There is no need to scare people I don't think the professionals have it right.

To replace the 20K per year you could just buy an annuity for about 300K. Or you could just cut your spending. The doomsayers on this message board can't seem to explain how people have been retiring for the last 100 years when the social safety net was much weaker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 05:08 PM
 
106,841 posts, read 109,092,448 times
Reputation: 80277
there are general rules of thumb but like everything else when it comes to humans they just get you in a ball park.

there is a whole lot more your missing from the equation than just spend 80% and save enough to pull 4%.

there are alot of parameters that have to be met in order for those guidelines to hold true at a high rate of success..

As of right now a 62 year old male can get about 18k a year non inflation adjusted from an immeadiate annuity with 300k.

Thats only good if your single as your spouse gets nothing at that level.

If you want it to carry over to a spouse you can get about 16k at 62.

With no inflation adjustments though by itself you can run into trouble all to easy.

Not a bad deal if you live but an awful deal if you dont.

Last edited by mathjak107; 12-03-2012 at 05:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 05:27 PM
 
1,679 posts, read 3,020,685 times
Reputation: 1296
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
there are general rules of thumb but like everything else when it comes to humans they just get you in a ball park.

there is a whole lot more your missing from the equation than just spend 80% and save enough to pull 4%.

there are alot of parameters that have to be met in order for those guidelines to hold true at a high rate of success..

As of right now a 62 year old male can get about 18k a year non inflation adjusted from an immeadiate annuity with 300k.

Thats only good if your single as your spouse gets nothing at that level.

Not a bad deal if you live but an awful deal if you dont.
I wonder how so many people have managed to retire in the last 75 years? The median income hasn't changed much in the last 75 years, if anything it has dropped slightly.

Was everyone poor 30 years ago? Did financial planners exist back than? I wonder
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 05:30 PM
 
106,841 posts, read 109,092,448 times
Reputation: 80277
Folks are working longer and retiring poorer. The jury is still out on how many failed boomer retirements we will see.

Many of the past generation didnt have to foot the retirement bill themselves. Pensions were a big part of alot of lives along with paid medical.

Life was different and expenses were different. It was rare mom even worked when i grew up. Im 60 now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Tri-State Area
2,942 posts, read 6,011,943 times
Reputation: 1839
One should aim to save about 25-30x their annual expenses less Social Security. You manage to tuck that away and you can retire comfortably. Don't pay no mind to the scare tactics of you must save 80% of gross income. Imagine if you are currently working and are saving 10% in a 401k - from the begininng you are starting out with 84% of gross (salary-10% 401k - 4.2% Fica - 1.4% Medicare), then deduct 15-20% for federal,state,local taxes, medical benefits - you now are living on 64% of gross. If you can swing it on 65% of gross today, why would you need 80% tomorrow - you don't. Even if you didn't save a dime in the 401k, you still would be coming home today with 75% of gross.

Remember, it's all about having enough savings/investments less any Social Security and/or pensions to cover expenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 01:43 AM
 
106,841 posts, read 109,092,448 times
Reputation: 80277
its usually a case of the chicken or the egg. the folks maxing out their 401k's and putting the biggest chunk away from their check are not the typical folks who dont hsve a decent amount saved .

its the people who barely save and are living on just about their entire pay checks while working that need the biggest percentage of what they earned when they retire.


those living on 84% of their pay check and maxing out their 401k's are more than likey not going to be the ones struggling and needing to save more.


like escort said its really about dollars and cents not percentages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top