Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2017, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,239 posts, read 27,629,646 times
Reputation: 16074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnatomicflux View Post
Sorry to hear, Lilly.
Thank you.

I still have two other dogs, but yes, It is sad.

I am going to get myself another dog from the animal shelter.

-----------------------------------------------

I threw my dog in the swimming pool once, he was a pretty good swimmer. He hated bath, but loved to swim. Maybe the PITA people would lecture me if they caught me. ANIMAL ABUSER! Well, I made mistakes but sheesh, I loved my dogs, all of them.

I will never put a silly pink dress on my dog, that is for sure. To each her own. :P
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2017, 08:40 AM
 
Location: The South
7,481 posts, read 6,267,244 times
Reputation: 13002
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
They make a movie about a smelly and unsanitary Poopeater........that is the controversy.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2017, 10:57 AM
 
5,756 posts, read 4,001,182 times
Reputation: 2308
They should of gotten a Golden Retriever to do the scene our family's dog would watch over all the kids in the pool like a mother hen and if she thought one was under the water for too long she would dive in to get them!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2017, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,538,973 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post
If you are talking about the one that TMZ supposedly faked or edited is some way, I am not offended by it if that is what you are asking.
Why is it every time a conservative is confronted with an unpleasant truth you immediately call that truth "fake"?

Is it because you like to follow your leader and do as he does, sorta like a wind up toy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2017, 02:37 PM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,030,859 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
I'm not making the jump between edited and what is clearly visible on the video?

The director himself denounced his crews actions, this isn't a conspiracy.
Nowhere did I say it was...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2017, 02:39 PM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,030,859 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
Are you remotely familiar with PETA? Or is this shooting from the hip?

There's a ton against factory farming. Remember the KFC/Tyson fiasco?
Yep People Enjoying Tasty Animals, know 'em well...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2017, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
3,853 posts, read 1,792,295 times
Reputation: 5041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norne View Post
This is insulting towards the dog. German shepherds are brave, good swimmers and generally enjoy being in the water. Presenting one as a cowardly scaredy-cat is offensive to the breed in general and would probably seem offensive to the dog in question if it could read. These dogs are braver than many an animal-rights nut.

Your post is absurd.


I am defending the German shepherd's right as an animal. He was forced into the water by the trainer against his will. Many others besides myself find this wrong and even the director found it to be unacceptable. If an animal doesn't feel comfortable to do a scene he/she should have the right to walk away and sit down and allow another animal who does feel more comfortable.

No where do I mention the abilities and strengths of German shepherds in general or their swimming capability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2017, 08:00 PM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
3,853 posts, read 1,792,295 times
Reputation: 5041
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
The dog didn't want to go in the water.

We know that from the video.

Why didn't it want to go?

Who knows, and who cares?

It didn't want to go in the water.

That's what we do know.

Exactly! Why can't others understand this??? If you see the tape anyone with compassion towards animal's would understand -------those who don't care are in denial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2017, 01:21 AM
 
16,618 posts, read 8,625,712 times
Reputation: 19449
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Why is it every time a conservative is confronted with an unpleasant truth you immediately call that truth "fake"?

Is it because you like to follow your leader and do as he does, sorta like a wind up toy?
Well why don't we start with who my supposed leader is?

If you are speaking of Trump, I didn't vote for him in the primary. However left with the choice of Trump or the career corrupt choice in the person of Hillary, rest assured I voted for Trump. I'd have voted for Sanders before I voted for Hillary. At least he is honest and has some integrity.

Second, there are plenty of stories out there explaining how the video was selectively edited to make is seem much worse than what actually happened.

http://www.theverge.com/2017/2/4/145...eo-faked-video

From the article;

The American Humane Association, the organization that supervised the treatment of the dogs on the film’s set, issued a statement this morning that the investigation had concluded and that the video “was deliberately edited for the purpose of misleading the public and stoking outrage,” noting that the two scenes in the video had been edited together. The report backs up statements from the film’s crew that the video was misleading, though it has not been made available for review, and a request to the American Humane Association weren’t returned by publication time.

The organization explained that the investigation had been carried out by “conducted by a respected animal cruelty expert.” It found that experts were present, that the proper safety precautions were taken during the film’s production, and that the dog in question was healthy.


One wonders if you will have something productive to say when "confronted with this unpleasant truth".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2017, 01:34 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,441,601 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
And how is that working out? The feedlots in Iowa and Southern Minnesota are expanding.
It's all politics. You have congressmen like Mr. King in Iowa who support farmers and are supported by farmers and are not about to let any legislation pass that would protect animals.

PETA and other animal rights groups are concerned about these feedlots, but until people stop seeing animal rights groups as "fringe," nothing is going to change.

Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Why is it every time a conservative is confronted with an unpleasant truth you immediately call that truth "fake"?

Is it because you like to follow your leader and do as he does, sorta like a wind up toy?
I'm a conservative, and I'm against the abuse of animals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post
Second, there are plenty of stories out there explaining how the video was selectively edited to make is seem much worse than what actually happened.

http://www.theverge.com/2017/2/4/145...eo-faked-video

From the article;

The American Humane Association, the organization that supervised the treatment of the dogs on the film’s set, issued a statement this morning that the investigation had concluded and that the video “was deliberately edited for the purpose of misleading the public and stoking outrage,” noting that the two scenes in the video had been edited together. The report backs up statements from the film’s crew that the video was misleading, though it has not been made available for review, and a request to the American Humane Association weren’t returned by publication time.

The organization explained that the investigation had been carried out by “conducted by a respected animal cruelty expert.” It found that experts were present, that the proper safety precautions were taken during the film’s production, and that the dog in question was healthy.


One wonders if you will have something productive to say when "confronted with this unpleasant truth".
It sounds like the American Humane Association is trying to cover up its own mistakes.

The video shown in this thread clearly was not edited. It speaks for itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top