Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
National (Ipsos, online) : Clinton +25
National (SurveyMonkey) : Clinton +11
Georgia (WSB-TV/Landmark) : Clinton +46
Kansas (Fort Hays State University) : Clinton +10
We finally have a poll for Kansas (from Fort Hays State University as listed above). According to Nate Silver, Kansas is a state that Sanders must win by like 18% to be on track to have a TIE in nomination, so Hillary leading in Kansas is bad news for Sanders.
But since there are still 44% of the voters being undecided, it means things can turn out either way, but the turnout is going to be awfully low like the 3 states that already voted, so that's another bad news for Sanders. If he can't bring out voters like Obama did in 2008 (even so, BO and HRC each got roughly 18 million votes) and Trump is doing this year, there is no way for Sanders to overcome Hillary.
Nope. It was almost 34,000 votes lower, or about 12% lower. Over 10% is not "almost the same"
Still, Sanders got twice as many votes as Bill, Al Gore and John Kerry did and 50% more than Hillary did in 2008. The turnout for Sanders at least smashed all records.
Still, Sanders got twice as many votes as Bill, Al Gore and John Kerry did and 50% more than Hillary did in 2008. The turnout for Sanders at least smashed all records.
Spin it however you want, Bernie's revolution hasn't happened, at least not yet. Unlikely to at all, IMO.
Nope. It was almost 34,000 votes lower, or about 12% lower. Over 10% is not "almost the same"
Turnout was lower than 2008, but higher than most other past Primaries. Primary turnout for the Democrats in 2008 smashed all sorts of records, and it wasn't even close to anything prior to that. Turnout this year is dowm from the records in 2008, but is still higher than it usually is.
With that being said getting back to parrt of the initial argument, I would agrree Bernie needs a strong Super Tuesday otherwise his campaign is in a bit of touble. He doesn't need to win a majority, but needs at least 4 and perhaps even 5 depending on some of the margins and delegate totals
Looks like most of the people who voted in SC are elderly African Americans. It will be a blowout for Clinton that's for sure. African Americans were 74-22 in favor of Clinton in Nevada and that could be the result in SC.
Looks like most of the people who voted in SC are elderly African Americans. It will be a blowout for Clinton that's for sure. African Americans were 74-22 in favor of Clinton in Nevada and that could be the result in SC.
More than likely, but that doesn't really matter much.
More than likely, but that doesn't really matter much.
You mean SC doesnt matter much?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
